Comparing the stability and reproducibility of brain-behavior relationships found using canonical correlation analysis and partial least squares within the ABCD sample.

Clinical neuroscience research is going through a translational crisis largely due to the challenges of producing meaningful and generalizable results. Two critical limitations within clinical neuroscience research are the use of univariate statistics and between-study methodological variation. Univariate statistics may not be sensitive enough to detect complex relationships between several variables, and methodological variation poses challenges to the generalizability of the results. We compared two widely used multivariate statistical approaches, canonical correlations analysis (CCA) and partial least squares correlation (PLS), to determine the generalizability and stability of their solutions. We show that the properties of the measures inputted into the analysis likely play a more substantial role in the generalizability and stability of results compared to the specific approach applied (i.e., CCA or PLS).