Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Primary care and abortion provider perspectives on mail-order medication abortion: a qualitative study.
Raifman, Sarah; Gurazada, Tanvi; Beaman, Jessica; Biggs, M Antonia; Schwarz, Eleanor Bimla; Gold, Marji; Grossman, Daniel.
Afiliação
  • Raifman S; Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, University of California, San Francisco, 1330 Broadway Suite 1100, Oakland, CA, 94612, USA. Sarah.Raifman@ucsf.edu.
  • Gurazada T; Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing at Emory University, 1520 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
  • Beaman J; San Francisco Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California, 1001 Potrero Ave, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Biggs MA; Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, University of California, San Francisco, 1330 Broadway Suite 1100, Oakland, CA, 94612, USA.
  • Schwarz EB; San Francisco Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California, 1001 Potrero Ave, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Gold M; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 3544 Jerome Ave, Bronx, NY, 10467, USA.
  • Grossman D; Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, University of California, San Francisco, 1330 Broadway Suite 1100, Oakland, CA, 94612, USA.
BMC Womens Health ; 24(1): 382, 2024 Jul 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38956609
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

This qualitative study aims to assess perspectives of clinicians and clinic staff on mail-order pharmacy dispensing for medication abortion.

METHODS:

Participants included clinicians and staff involved in implementing a mail-order dispensing model for medication abortion at eleven clinics in seven states as part of a prospective cohort study, which began in January 2020 (before the FDA removed the in-person dispensing requirement for mifepristone). From June 2021 to July 2022, we invited participants at the participating clinics, including six primary care and five abortion clinics, to complete a semi-structured video interview about their experiences. We then conducted qualitative thematic analysis of interview data, summarizing themes related to perceived benefits and concerns about the mail-order model, perceived patient interest, and potential barriers to larger-scale implementation.

RESULTS:

We conducted 24 interviews in total with clinicians (13 physicians and one nurse practitioner) and clinic staff (n = 10). Participants highlighted perceived benefits of the mail-order model, including its potential to expand abortion services into primary care, increase patient autonomy and privacy, and to normalize abortion services. They also highlighted key logistical, clinical, and feasibility concerns about the mail-order model, and specific challenges related to integrating abortion into primary care.

CONCLUSION:

Clinicians and clinic staff working in primary care and abortion clinics were optimistic that mail-order dispensing of medication abortion can improve the ability of some providers to provide abortion and enable more patients to access services. The feasibility of mail-order pharmacy dispensing of medication abortion following the Supreme Court Dobbs decision is to be determined. TRIAL REGISTRATION Registry Clinicaltrials.gov. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03913104. Date of registration first submitted on April 3, 2019 and first posted on April 12, 2019.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Serviços Postais / Atenção Primária à Saúde / Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde / Aborto Induzido / Pesquisa Qualitativa Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged / Pregnancy País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Serviços Postais / Atenção Primária à Saúde / Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde / Aborto Induzido / Pesquisa Qualitativa Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged / Pregnancy País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article