Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Need for improvement in the care of patients with Clostridioides difficile infections (CDI) - expert opinion in international comparison]. / Verbesserungsbedarf in der Versorgung von Patienten/-innen mit Clostridioides-difficile-lnfektionen (CDI) ­ Experten/-innenmeinung im internationalen Vergleich.
Vehreschild, Maria J G T; Schreiber, Stefan; von Müller, Lutz; Epple, Hans-Jörg; Manthey, Carolin; Oh, Jun; Weinke, Thomas; Wahler, Steffen; Stallmach, Andreas.
Afiliação
  • Vehreschild MJGT; Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Medizinische Klinik 2, Infektiologie, Klinische Mikrobiomforschung, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
  • Schreiber S; Clinic for Internal Medicine I, Kiel, Germany.
  • von Müller L; Christopherus Kliniken Coesfeld, Coesfeld, Germany.
  • Epple HJ; Gastroenterology, Charité-Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany.
  • Manthey C; Gemeinschaftspraxis Innere Medizin (GIM), Witten, Germany.
  • Oh J; Pediatrics, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Weinke T; Praxis Dr. Leinhos, Berlin, Germany.
  • Wahler S; St. Bernward GmbH, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Stallmach A; Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectology, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany.
Z Gastroenterol ; 62(7): 1032-1041, 2024 Jul.
Article em De | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38976982
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), as a nosocomial disease, is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Even though the incidence of CDI has been declining in Germany in recent years, the individual infection may pose a medical challenge despite therapeutic advances. The aim here is to clarify which gaps practitioners consider to be particularly serious in care and in the existing evidence base.

METHODS:

In a moderated workshop of German CDI experts the topics considered as relevant were identified. A survey already conducted in five other countries (Australia, France, Great Britain, Canada, and Italy) was adapted and processed by 27 practitioners. During the evaluation, the topics perceived as particularly important were identified, the statements of the specialist groups were compared and changes in opinion were considered.

RESULTS:

27 fully completed questionnaires were evaluated. The need for improvement was primarily seen in the prevention of CDI recurrences (74.1%) and the treatment of recurrences (55.6%). Evidence deficits were noted in the treatment of recurrences (55.6%) and identification of risk factors for recurrences (48.1%). Improving care via fecal microbiota transfer (FMT) was named by 70.4%. For guidelines, more clarity (48.1%) and more regular updates (40.7%) were desired. For patients, better education on appropriate antibiotic use (52.0%) and choice of FMT were desired (48.1%).

SUMMARY:

The German expert view and the international assessment is similar, when asked about the need for improvement in care and evidence gaps in the treatment of patients with CDI The focus is on prevention and therapy of recurrent CDI. The problem of access to FMT is a German peculiarity that seems to need improvement.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções por Clostridium Limite: Humans País como assunto: Europa Idioma: De Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções por Clostridium Limite: Humans País como assunto: Europa Idioma: De Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article