Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The determinants of mental health inequalities between Chinese migrants and non-migrants during the Shanghai 2022 lockdown: a Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition.
Zheng, Meng; Kong, Di; Wu, Kunpeng; Li, Gen; Zhang, Yi; Chen, Wen; Hall, Brian J.
Afiliação
  • Zheng M; Department of Medical Statistics, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Kong D; Center for Migrant Health Policy, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Wu K; Department of Medical Statistics, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Li G; Center for Migrant Health Policy, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Zhang Y; Department of Medical Statistics, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Chen W; Center for Migrant Health Policy, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Hall BJ; Center for Global Healthy Equity, NYU Shanghai, Shanghai, China.
Int J Equity Health ; 23(1): 136, 2024 Jul 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38982412
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The mental health inequality between migrants and non-migrants was exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Identifying key determinants of this inequality is essential in promoting health equity.

METHODS:

This cross-sectional study recruited Shanghai residents by purposive sampling during the city-wide lockdown (from April 29 to June 1, 2022) using an online questionnaire. Migration statuses (non-migrants, permanent migrants, and temporary migrants) were identified by migration experience and by household registration in Shanghai. Mental health symptoms (depression, anxiety, loneliness, and problematic anger) were assessed by self-report scales. The nonlinear Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition was used to quantify mental health inequality (i.e., differences in predicted probabilities between migration groups) and the contribution of expected correlates (i.e., change in predicted probability associated with variation in the correlate divided by the group difference).

RESULTS:

The study included 2738 participants (771 [28.2%] non-migrants; 389 [14.2%] permanent migrants; 1578 [57.6%] temporary migrants). We found inequalities in depression (7.1%) and problematic anger (7.8%) between permanent migrants and non-migrants, and inequalities in anxiety (7.3%) and loneliness (11.3%) between temporary migrants and non-migrants. When comparing permanent migrants and non-migrants, age and social capital explained 12.7% and 17.1% of the inequality in depression, and 13.3% and 21.4% of the inequality in problematic anger. Between temporary migrants and non-migrants, age and social capital also significantly contributed to anxiety inequality (23.0% and 18.2%) and loneliness inequality (26.5% and 16.3%), while monthly household income (20.4%) and loss of monthly household income (34.0%) contributed the most to anxiety inequality.

CONCLUSIONS:

Significant inequalities in depression and problematic anger among permanent migrants and inequalities in anxiety and loneliness among temporary migrants were observed. Strengthening social capital and economic security can aid in public health emergency preparedness and promote mental health equity among migrant populations.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Migrantes / Saúde Mental / Depressão / COVID-19 / Solidão Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Migrantes / Saúde Mental / Depressão / COVID-19 / Solidão Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article