Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with endoscopic papillary balloon dilation in treatment of gallbladder stones with common bile duct stones: A retrospective study.
Liu, Hong-Dan; Zhang, Qi; Xu, Wen-Si; Jin, Shuang.
Afiliação
  • Liu HD; Department of Gastroenterology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Qiqihar Medical University, Qiqihar 161000, Heilongjiang Province, China.
  • Zhang Q; Department of Gastroenterology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Qiqihar Medical University, Qiqihar 161000, Heilongjiang Province, China.
  • Xu WS; Department of Gastroenterology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Qiqihar Medical University, Qiqihar 161000, Heilongjiang Province, China.
  • Jin S; Department of Gastroenterology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Qiqihar Medical University, Qiqihar 161000, Heilongjiang Province, China. jinshuang8877@qmu.edu.cn.
World J Gastrointest Surg ; 16(6): 1700-1708, 2024 Jun 27.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38983353
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The incidence of cholelithiasis has been on the rise in recent years, but the choice of procedure is controversial.

AIM:

To investigate the efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) combined with endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD) in patients with gallbladder stones (GS) with common bile duct stones (CBDS).

METHODS:

The clinical data of 102 patients with GS combined with CBDS were selected for retrospective analysis and divided into either an LC + EPBD group (n = 50) or an LC + endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) group (n = 52) according to surgical methods. Surgery-related indexes, postoperative recovery, postoperative complications, and expression levels of inflammatory response indexes were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS:

Total surgical time, stone free rate, rate of conversion to laparotomy, and successful stone extraction rate did not differ significantly between the LC + EPBD group and LC + EST group. Intraoperative hemorrhage, time to ambulation, and length of hospitalization in the LC + EPBD group were lower than those of the LC + EST group (P < 0.05). The rate of total complications of the two groups was 9.80% and 17.65%, respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant. No serious complications occurred in either group. At 48 h postoperatively, the expression levels of interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-α, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin were lower in the LC + EPBD group than in the LC + EST group (P < 0.05). At 3 d postoperatively, the expression levels of aspartate transaminase, alanine transaminase, and total bilirubin were lower in the LC + EPBD group than in the LC + EST group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION:

LC combined with EPBD and LC combined with EST are both effective procedures for the treatment of GS with CBDS, in which LC combined with EPBD is beneficial to shorten the patient's hospitalization time, reduce the magnitude of elevated inflammatory response indexes, and promote postoperative recovery.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article