Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Artificial Intelligence-based Segmentation of Residual Pancreatic Cancer in Resection Specimens Following Neoadjuvant Treatment (ISGPP-2): International Improvement and Validation Study.
Janssen, Boris V; Oteman, Bart; Ali, Mahsoem; Valkema, Pieter A; Adsay, Volkan; Basturk, Olca; Chatterjee, Deyali; Chou, Angela; Crobach, Stijn; Doukas, Michael; Drillenburg, Paul; Esposito, Irene; Gill, Anthony J; Hong, Seung-Mo; Jansen, Casper; Kliffen, Mike; Mittal, Anubhav; Samra, Jas; van Velthuysen, Marie-Louise F; Yavas, Aslihan; Kazemier, Geert; Verheij, Joanne; Steyerberg, Ewout; Besselink, Marc G; Wang, Huamin; Verbeke, Caroline; Fariña, Arantza; de Boer, Onno J.
Afiliação
  • Janssen BV; Departments of Surgery.
  • Oteman B; Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam.
  • Ali M; Cancer Center Amsterdam.
  • Valkema PA; Departments of Surgery.
  • Adsay V; Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam.
  • Basturk O; Cancer Center Amsterdam.
  • Chatterjee D; Cancer Center Amsterdam.
  • Chou A; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit.
  • Crobach S; Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam.
  • Doukas M; Cancer Center Amsterdam.
  • Drillenburg P; Department of Pathology, Koc University and KUTTAM Research Center, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Esposito I; Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
  • Gill AJ; Department of Anatomical Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
  • Hong SM; Cancer Diagnosis and Pathology Group, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.
  • Jansen C; University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Kliffen M; Departments of Pathology.
  • Mittal A; Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center.
  • Samra J; Department of Pathology, OLVG, Amsterdam.
  • van Velthuysen MF; Institute of Pathology, Heinrich-Heine-University and University Hospital of Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
  • Yavas A; Cancer Diagnosis and Pathology Group, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.
  • Kazemier G; University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Verheij J; Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Steyerberg E; Laboratorium Pathologie Oost-Nederland, Hengelo.
  • Besselink MG; Department of Pathology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
  • Wang H; Department of Pathology, Maasstad ziekenhuis, Rotterdam.
  • Verbeke C; Department of Surgery of Medical Research, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.
  • Fariña A; University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • de Boer OJ; Department of Surgery of Medical Research, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.
Am J Surg Pathol ; 48(9): 1108-1116, 2024 Sep 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38985503
ABSTRACT
Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has become routine in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Pathologists examine pancreatic cancer resection specimens to evaluate the effect of NAT. However, an automated scoring system to objectively quantify residual pancreatic cancer (RPC) is currently lacking. Herein, we developed and validated the first automated segmentation model using artificial intelligence techniques to objectively quantify RPC. Digitized histopathological tissue slides were included from resected pancreatic cancer specimens from 14 centers in 7 countries in Europe, North America, Australia, and Asia. Four different scanner types were used Philips (56%), Hamamatsu (27%), 3DHistech (10%), and Leica (7%). Regions of interest were annotated and classified as cancer, non-neoplastic pancreatic ducts, and others. A U-Net model was trained to detect RPC. Validation consisted of by-scanner internal-external cross-validation. Overall, 528 unique hematoxylin and eosin (H & E) slides from 528 patients were included. In the individual Philips, Hamamatsu, 3DHistech, and Leica scanner cross-validations, mean F1 scores of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.77-0.84), 0.80 (0.78-0.83), 0.76 (0.65-0.78), and 0.71 (0.65-0.78) were achieved, respectively. In the meta-analysis of the cross-validations, the mean F1 score was 0.78 (0.71-0.84). A final model was trained on the entire data set. This ISGPP model is the first segmentation model using artificial intelligence techniques to objectively quantify RPC following NAT. The internally-externally cross-validated model in this study demonstrated robust performance in detecting RPC in specimens. The ISGPP model, now made publically available, enables automated RPC segmentation and forms the basis for objective NAT response evaluation in pancreatic cancer.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pancreatectomia / Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Inteligência Artificial / Neoplasia Residual / Terapia Neoadjuvante Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pancreatectomia / Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Inteligência Artificial / Neoplasia Residual / Terapia Neoadjuvante Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article