Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Magnetic resonance thermometry for hyperthermia in the oropharynx region.
Feddersen, Theresa V; Hernandez-Tamames, Juan A; Paulides, Margarethus M; Kroesen, Michiel; van Rhoon, Gerard C; Poot, Dirk H J.
Afiliação
  • Feddersen TV; Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Hernandez-Tamames JA; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Paulides MM; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Kroesen M; Department of Imaging Physics, Applied Physics Faculty, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands.
  • van Rhoon GC; Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Poot DHJ; Care & Cure Research Lab of the Electromagnetics Group, Center for Care & Cure Technology (C3Te), Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Int J Hyperthermia ; 41(1): 2352545, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38991549
ABSTRACT
Magnetic resonance thermometry (MRT) can measure in-vivo 3D-temperature changes in real-time and noninvasively. However, for the oropharynx region and the entire head and neck, motion potentially introduces large artifacts. Considering long treatment times of 60-90 min, this study aims to evaluate whether MRT around the oropharynx is clinically feasible for hyperthermia treatments and quantify the effects of breathing and swallowing on MRT performance. A 3D-ME-FGRE sequence was used in a phantom cooling down and around the oropharynx of five volunteers over ∼75 min. The imaging protocol consisted of imaging with acceleration (ARC = 2), number of image averages (NEX = 1,2 and 3). For volunteers, the acquisitions included a breath-hold scan and scans with deliberate swallowing. MRT performance was quantified in neck muscle, spinal cord and masseter muscle, using mean average error (MAE), mean error (ME) and spatial standard deviation (SD). In phantom, an increase in NEX leads to a significant decrease in SD, but MAE and ME were unchanged. No significant difference was found in volunteers between the different scans. There was a significant difference between the regions evaluated neck muscle had the best MAE (=1.96 °C) and SD (=0.82 °C), followed by spinal cord (MAE = 3.17 °C, SD = 0.92 °C) and masseter muscle (MAE = 4.53 °C, SD = 1.16 °C). Concerning the ME, spinal cord did best, then neck muscle and masseter muscle, with values of -0.64 °C, 1.15 °C and -3.05 °C respectively. Breathing, swallowing, and different ways of imaging (acceleration and NEX) do not significantly influence the MRT performance in the oropharynx region. The ROI selected however, leads to significant differences.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Orofaringe / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Termometria Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Orofaringe / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Termometria Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article