Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Use of an Opt-Out vs Opt-In Strategy Increases Use of Residency Mental Health Services.
Guldner, Gregory; Siegel, Jason T; Broadbent, Chandler; Ayutyanont, Napatkamon; Streletz, Deborah; Popa, Alina; Fuller, Joshua; Sisemore, Timothy.
Afiliação
  • Guldner G; is Program Director, Emeritus, Riverside Community Hospital Emergency Medicine Residency, and Professor of Emergency Medicine, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California, USA.
  • Siegel JT; is Professor of Psychology, Division of Behavioral and Organizational Science, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, California, USA.
  • Broadbent C; is Behavioral Science Faculty, Riverside Community Hospital Family Medicine Residency, and a Clinical Psychology Doctoral Student, California Baptist University, Department of Psychology, Riverside, California, USA.
  • Ayutyanont N; is Division Research Director, Far West Division, HCA Healthcare, Henderson, Nevada, USA.
  • Streletz D; is Program Director, Riverside Community Hospital Family Medicine Residency, Riverside, California, USA.
  • Popa A; is Program Director, Riverside Community Hospital Internal Medicine Residency, and Professor of Medicine, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California, USA.
  • Fuller J; is Associate Professor of Industrial-Organizational Psychology, California Baptist University, Riverside, California, USA; and.
  • Sisemore T; is the Former Director of Psychological Services of Riverside, Riverside, California, USA.
J Grad Med Educ ; 16(2): 195-201, 2024 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38993316
ABSTRACT
Background Residents report high levels of distress but low utilization of mental health services. Prior research has shown several barriers that prevent residents from opting into available mental health services. Objective To determine the impact of a mental health initiative centered around an opt-out versus an opt-in approach to help-seeking, on the use of psychotherapy. Methods Resident use of psychotherapy was compared between 2 time frames. During the first time frame (July 1, 2020 to January 31, 2021), residents were offered access to therapy that they could self-initiate by calling to schedule an appointment (opt-in). The second time frame (February 1, 2021 to April 30, 2021) involved the switch to an opt-out structure, during which the same residents were scheduled for a session but could choose to cancel. Additional changes were implemented to reduce stigma and minimize barriers. The outcome was psychotherapy use by residents. Results Of the 114 residents, 7 (6%) self-initiated therapy during the opt-in period. When these same residents were placed in an opt-out context, 59 of the remaining 107 residents (55%) kept their initial appointment, and 23 (39%) self-initiated additional sessions. Altogether, across both phases, a total of 30 of the 114 residents initiated therapy (ie, 7 during the opt-in and 23 during the opt-out). The differences in therapy use between the 2 phases are statistically significant (P<.001 by McNemar's test). Conclusions There was a substantial increase in residents' use of psychotherapy after the opt-out initiative that included efforts to reduce stigma and encourage mental health services.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Psicoterapia / Internato e Residência / Serviços de Saúde Mental Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Psicoterapia / Internato e Residência / Serviços de Saúde Mental Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article