Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Experience of care from the perspectives of inpatients with palliative care needs: a cross-sectional study using a patient reported experience measure (PREM).
Singh, Gursharan K; Mudge, Alison; Matthews, Robyn; Yates, Patsy; Phillips, Jane L; Virdun, Claudia.
Afiliação
  • Singh GK; Centre for Healthcare Transformation, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, Australia. gursharan.singh@qut.edu.au.
  • Mudge A; Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, 4059, Australia. gursharan.singh@qut.edu.au.
  • Matthews R; Greater Brisbane Medical School, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, Australia.
  • Yates P; Department of Internal Medicine and Aged Care, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Butterfield Street, Herston, QLD, Australia.
  • Phillips JL; Cancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Butterfield Street, Herston, QLD, Australia.
  • Virdun C; Centre for Healthcare Transformation, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
BMC Palliat Care ; 23(1): 177, 2024 Jul 18.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39026237
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Improving palliative care for inpatients is urgently needed. Data from patient-reported experience measures (PREM) can assist in identifying areas for focused improvement. This study aimed to describe patient reported experience of care in inpatients with palliative care needs, to inform a baseline understanding of care experience and identify key areas for improvement.

METHODS:

Cross-sectional study design where inpatients with palliative care needs were invited to complete 'consideRATE,' a patient reported experience measure of care, over six months in 2022. Inpatients with palliative care needs receiving care on an oncology, general medicine/renal and general medicine/respiratory ward (n = 3) at an Australian metropolitan hospital were screened for eligibility. Carers could provide proxy responses where inpatients were unable to participate. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse quantitative ratings, whilst free text responses were analysed using integrated thematic analysis.

RESULTS:

One-hundred and twenty participants (108 patients and 12 carers) completed consideRATE. The questions with the highest number of 'very good' responses were attention to symptoms, attention to feelings and attention to what matters most; the questions with the lowest number of 'very good' responses was attention to patients' affairs, what to expect, and the environment of care. Almost half (n = 57, 48%) indicated that attention to patients' affairs 'did not apply' to their inpatient stay. Analysis of 532 free text responses across 8 questions highlighted the importance of feeling supported, feeling informed, feeling heard and navigating the clinical environment.

CONCLUSION:

Enabling inpatients with palliative care needs to provide feedback about their experience of care is one method of ensuring improvements matter to patients. Supporting clinical teams to understand and use these data to make tailored improvements is the next step in this multi-phase research.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cuidados Paliativos / Pacientes Internados Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País como assunto: Oceania Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cuidados Paliativos / Pacientes Internados Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País como assunto: Oceania Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article