Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Improving disease-specific survival for patients with Sezary syndrome in the modern era of systemic therapies.
Campbell, Belinda A; Dobos, Gabor; Haider, Zahra; Bagot, Martine; Evison, Felicity; van der Weyden, Carrie; McCormack, Chris; Ram-Wolff, Caroline; Miladi, Maryam; Prince, H Miles; Scarisbrick, Julia J.
Afiliação
  • Campbell BA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Dobos G; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
  • Haider Z; Department of Clinical Pathology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
  • Bagot M; Department of Dermatology, Hôpital Saint Louis, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
  • Evison F; Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
  • van der Weyden C; Beckenham Beacon, Kings College Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • McCormack C; Department of Dermatology, Hôpital Saint Louis, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
  • Ram-Wolff C; Health Data Science Team, Research Development and Innovation, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
  • Miladi M; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
  • Prince HM; Department of Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Scarisbrick JJ; Department of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Br J Haematol ; 2024 Jul 19.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39031983
ABSTRACT
Traditionally, Sezary syndrome (SS) has been associated with few therapeutic options and poor prognosis, with 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) less than one-third in historical cohorts. However, newer therapies and combinations are associated with impressive time-to-next-treatment (TTNT), particularly allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (AlloSCT) and combination therapies notably those including extracorporeal photopheresis. In this multicentre, international study, we explored the prognostic outcomes of 178 patients exclusively managed for SS, diagnosed between 2012 and 2020, and treated in the modern therapeutic era. In this cohort, 58 different therapies were delivered, with 13.5% of patients receiving AlloSCT. Long-term survival exceeded historical reports with 5-year DSS and OS of 56.4% and 53.4% respectively. In those receiving AlloSCT, prognosis was excellent 5-year DSS and OS were 90.5% and 78.0% respectively. Confirming the results from the Cutaneous Lymphoma International Consortium (CLIC), LDH and LCT had significant prognostic impact. Unlike earlier studies, stage did not have prognostic impact; we speculate that greater relative benefit favours patients with extensive lymphomatous nodal disease (Stage IVA2) compared to historical reports. For patients ineligible for AlloSCT, the prognosis remains relatively poor (5-year DSS 51.4% and OS 49.6%), representing ongoing unmet needs for more effective novel agents and investigation of improved therapeutic combinations.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article