Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Puppies as the primary causal animal for human rabies cases: three-year prospective study of human rabies in the Philippines.
Saito, Nobuo; Inton, Karren L; Mauhay, Jaira D; Solante, Rontgene M; Guzman, Ferdinand D; Yamada, Kentaro; Kamiya, Yasuhiko; Saito-Obata, Mariko; Quiambao, Beatriz P; Yahiro, Takaaki; Kimitsuki, Kazunori; Nishizono, Akira.
Afiliação
  • Saito N; Research Center for Global and Local Infectious Diseases, Oita University, Yufu, Japan.
  • Inton KL; Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Yufu, Japan.
  • Mauhay JD; Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan.
  • Solante RM; School of Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan.
  • Guzman FD; Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Yufu, Japan.
  • Yamada K; Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Yufu, Japan.
  • Kamiya Y; San Lazaro Hospital, Manila, Philippines.
  • Saito-Obata M; San Lazaro Hospital, Manila, Philippines.
  • Quiambao BP; Laboratory of Veterinary Public Health, Department of Veterinary Medical Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan.
  • Yahiro T; School of Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan.
  • Kimitsuki K; Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
  • Nishizono A; Research Institute for Tropical Medicine, Muntinlupa, Philippines.
Front Microbiol ; 15: 1425766, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39040907
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

While rabies remains a global concern, detailed studies on human rabies, particularly regarding causal animals and the reasons for not receiving postexposure prophylaxis (PEP), are lacking.

Methods:

We conducted a 3-year prospective study (October 2019-September 2022) at the Philippines' largest rabies referral center. We interviewed patients with suspected rabies and their families. We used LN34 qRT-PCR and rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test on saliva samples. We also compared our findings with two retrospective studies at the same hospital.

Results:

We enrolled 151 patients, including 131 with potential rabies exposure. Similar to retrospective studies, the participants were predominantly males (75.5%), adults (76.8%), low-income individuals (91.4%), and rural dwellers (62.3%). The causal animals were mainly dogs (97.0%), with similar incubation periods, clinical symptoms, and a high proportion not receiving vaccines or immunoglobulins (93.2%). Most causal animals were owned by either the patients' households or their neighbors (60.2%), with a significant proportion being puppies (58.8%). Most patients had knowledge of rabies; however, reasons for not seeking PEP included misconceptions about minor bites not causing rabies (51.3%), beliefs in traditional healers (33.9%), and economic constraints (22.6%). Despite completing the WHO regimen, two PEP failures were observed. LN34 qRT-PCR detected 98 positive cases (sensitivity, 64.9%; 95% CI 56.7-72.5). These strains belong to the Southeast Asia 4 subclade.

Discussion:

In conclusion, this study highlights the role of puppies as primary causal animals and the presence of misconceptions that preclude patients from acquiring PEP.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article