Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Central Nervous System Prophylaxis Utilization in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Within a Large Community Health System.
Williams, Michael J; Atienza, Sol D; Aranda, Renee H; Flint, Kayleigh B; Sana, Sherjeel; Medlin, Stephen C; Gul, Zartash; Sanchez, Federico A; Thompson, Michael A.
Afiliação
  • Williams MJ; Department of Pharmacy Services, Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center, Advocate Health, Milwaukee, WI.
  • Atienza SD; Aurora Cancer Care, Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center, Advocate Health, Milwaukee, WI.
  • Aranda RH; Department of Pharmacy Services, Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center, Advocate Health, Milwaukee, WI.
  • Flint KB; Aurora Cancer Care, Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center, Advocate Health, Milwaukee, WI.
  • Sana S; Department of Pharmacy Services, Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center, Advocate Health, Milwaukee, WI.
  • Medlin SC; Aurora Cancer Care, Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center, Advocate Health, Milwaukee, WI.
  • Gul Z; Department of Pharmacy Services, Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center, Advocate Health, Milwaukee, WI.
  • Sanchez FA; Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, OR.
  • Thompson MA; Aurora Cancer Care, Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center, Advocate Health, Milwaukee, WI.
J Patient Cent Res Rev ; 11(2): 81-87, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39044850
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

The impact of central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is contentious. The CNS International Prognostic Index (IPI) calculator offers prognostic guidance in identifying those patients who may be at highest risk of disease progression or relapse to the CNS. However, it is unclear whether this tool has guided clinician decision-making in a real-world setting. Studies have suggested that CNS prophylaxis may not offer clinically significant benefit in terms of preventing CNS disease progression. Given this, we investigated the utilization of CNS prophylaxis within our own population and documentation of the CNS-IPI score.

Methods:

We retrospectively evaluated patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2017. Patients were assessed for receipt of CNS prophylaxis in the form of intrathecal (IT) chemotherapy and/or high-dose intravenous (IV) methotrexate. CNS-IPI scores were calculated for all patients who received CNS prophylaxis or those who experienced CNS disease. Long-term outcomes at five years from diagnosis included CNS progression/relapse and survival.

Results:

Of 234 patients who met criteria, 20 (8.6%) received either IV methotrexate or IT chemotherapy; most received IT methotrexate. No patients in the IT prophylaxis group developed CNS disease, while two of eight IV methotrexate patients experienced CNS disease involvement. The incidence of CNS progression was 3.7% in the no prophylaxis group and 10% in those who received prophylaxis.

Conclusions:

This study revealed low utilization of CNS prophylaxis and CNS-IPI documentation in a community hospital system. Given large differences between groups, claims of CNS prophylaxis efficacy are unable to be made. CNS relapse rates were consistent with existing literature and promote continued evaluation of the utility of current CNS prophylaxis approaches in DLBCL. New unambiguously effective therapeutic approaches are needed and may encourage a higher rate of standardized use.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article