Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Dutch multidisciplinary guideline on anterior knee pain: Patellofemoral pain and patellar tendinopathy.
Ophey, Martin; Koëter, Sander; van Ooijen, Lianne; van Ark, Mathijs; Boots, Fred; Ilbrink, Shanna; Lankhorst, Nienke A; Piscaer, Tom; Vestering, Myrthe; den Ouden Vierwind, Mirre; van Linschoten, Robbart; van Berkel, Sietske.
Afiliação
  • Ophey M; IJsveldFysio - Private Physiotherapy Clinic, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Koëter S; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van Ooijen L; Orthopaedic Surgery, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • van Ark M; Profysic - Private Clinic for Sport Podiatry, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
  • Boots F; Physiotherapy Department, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Ilbrink S; Centre of Expertise Primary Care (ECEZG), Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Lankhorst NA; Boots Solide Werken, Gorinchem, The Netherlands.
  • Piscaer T; Jessica Gal Sportartsen, Amsterdam & Sport- en Beweegkliniek, Haarlem, The Netherlands.
  • Vestering M; Independent General Practitioner, The Hague, The Netherlands.
  • den Ouden Vierwind M; Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van Linschoten R; Department of Radiology, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede, The Netherlands.
  • van Berkel S; Knowledge Institute of the Dutch Association of Medical Specialists, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39045713
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this study was to develop a multidisciplinary guideline for patellofemoral pain (PFP) and patellar tendinopathy (PT) to facilitate clinical decision-making in primary and secondary care.

METHODS:

A multidisciplinary expert panel identified questions in clinical decision-making. Based on a systematic literature search, the strength of the scientific evidence was determined according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) method and the weight assigned to the considerations by the expert panel together determined the strength of the recommendations.

RESULTS:

After confirming PFP or PT as a clinical diagnosis, patients should start with exercise therapy. Additional conservative treatments are indicated only when exercise therapy does not result in clinically relevant changes after six (PFP) or 12 (PT) weeks. Pain medications should be reserved for cases of severe pain. The additional value of imaging assessments for PT is limited. Open surgery is reserved for very specific cases of nonresponders to exercise therapy and those requiring additional conservative treatments. Although the certainty of evidence regarding exercise therapy for PFP and PT had to be downgraded ('very low GRADE' and 'low GRADE'), the expert panel advocates its use as the primary treatment strategy. The panel further formulated weaker recommendations regarding additional conservative treatments, pain medications, imaging assessments and open surgery ('very low GRADE' to 'low GRADE' assessment or absence of scientific evidence).

CONCLUSION:

This guideline recommends starting with exercise therapy for PFP and PT. The recommendations facilitate clinical decision-making, and thereby optimizing treatment and preventing unnecessary burdens, risks and costs to patients and society. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level V, clinical practice guideline.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article