Retrospective assessment of short-term outcomes of robotic- versus laparoscopic-assisted duodenal diamond anastomosis in neonates.
Surg Endosc
; 38(9): 5214-5219, 2024 Sep.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-39046493
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE:
The purpose of this study was to retrospectively compare the short-term outcomes of robotic- (RAD) and laparoscopic-assisted duodenal diamond-shaped anastomosis (LAD) in neonates.METHODS:
Neonates who underwent RAD (n = 30) or LAD (n = 38) between January 2019 and December 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. Major patient data were collected, including preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative information.RESULTS:
All patients were neonates below the age of 30 days weighing 4 kg. Thirty (44.1%) neonates underwent RAD and 38 neonates (55.9%) underwent LAD. Compared to the LAD group, the RAD group had a shorter intra-abdominal operation time (RAD, 60.0(50.0 ~ 70.0) min; LAD, 79.9(69.0 ~ 95.3) min; p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in immediate and 30-day complications between the two groups.CONCLUSIONS:
RAD is safe and effective in neonates. Compared to traditional LAD, RAD showed comparable results.Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
1
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Anastomose Cirúrgica
/
Laparoscopia
/
Duodeno
/
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos
Limite:
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
/
Newborn
Idioma:
En
Ano de publicação:
2024
Tipo de documento:
Article