Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Safety of first-line systemic therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Zhan, Yanrong; Cheng, Xianwen; Mei, Pingping; Tan, Shufa; Feng, Wenzhe; Jiang, Hua.
Afiliação
  • Zhan Y; Rudong People's Hospital / Affiliated Rudong Hospital of Xinglin College, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, 226400, China. 220110222844@email.sntcm.edu.cn.
  • Cheng X; Ankang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Ankang, Shaanxi, 725000, China.
  • Mei P; Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 201203, China.
  • Tan S; Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, Shaanxi, 712000, China.
  • Feng W; Affiliated Hospital of Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, Shaanxi, 712000, China. 383686199@qq.com.
  • Jiang H; Affiliated Hospital of Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, Shaanxi, 712000, China.
BMC Cancer ; 24(1): 893, 2024 Jul 24.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39048944
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the safety of first-line systemic therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer through network meta-analysis.

METHODS:

The literature from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases was searched from the inception of the databases to August 15, 2023, and strict inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to screen studies. The Cochrane Bias Risk Assessment Tool (RoB 2.0) was used to evaluate the quality of the included literature. Network meta-analysis was conducted using Stata 15.0 and R4.3.1 software to compare the incidence of adverse events (AEs) among different treatment regimens.

RESULTS:

A total of 53 randomized controlled trials, involving 17,351 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), were ultimately included, encompassing 29 different therapeutic approaches. According to SUCRA rankings, the CAPOX regimen is most likely to rank first in terms of safety, while the FOLFOXIRI + panitumumab regimen is most likely to rank last. In terms of specific AEs, the CAPOX regimen, whether used alone or in combination with targeted drugs (bevacizumab and cetuximab), is associated with a reduced risk of neutropenia and febrile neutropenia, as well as an increased risk of thrombocytopenia and diarrhea. The FOLFOX regimen, with or without bevacizumab, is linked to an increased risk of neutropenia and peripheral sensory neuropathy. The FOLFIRI/CAPIRI + bevacizumab regimen is associated with a reduced risk of peripheral sensory neuropathy. S-1 and S-1 + oxaliplatin are well-tolerated in terms of gastrointestinal reactions. The FOLFOXIRI regimen, whether used alone or in combination with targeted drugs, is associated with various AEs.

CONCLUSION:

In summary, the CAPOX regimen may be the safest option among the first-line systemic treatment regimens for mCRC patients, while the FOLFOXIRI + panitumumab regimen may be associated with a higher incidence of grade 3 or higher AEs.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Colorretais / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto / Metanálise em Rede Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Colorretais / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto / Metanálise em Rede Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article