Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Scale for the environments evaluation of professional nursing practice-shortened version: Psychometric evaluation.
Ribeiro, Olga Maria Pimenta Lopes; de Lima Trindade, Letícia; da Rocha, Carla Gomes; Teles, Paulo João Figueiredo Cabral; Mendes, Mariana; Ribeiro, Marlene Patrícia; de Abreu Pereira, Soraia Cristina; da Conceição Alves Faria, Ana; da Silva, João Miguel Almeida Ventura; de Sousa, Clemente Neves.
Afiliação
  • Ribeiro OMPL; Nursing School of Porto (ESEP) and CINTESIS@RISE, Porto, Portugal.
  • de Lima Trindade L; Santa Catarina State University and Regional Community University of Chapecó, Chapecó, Brazil.
  • da Rocha CG; Institute of Health, School of Health Sciences, HES-SO, Sion, Switzerland.
  • Teles PJFC; School of Economics, University of Porto and LIAAD-INESC Porto LA, Porto, Portugal.
  • Mendes M; CNPQ Scholarship, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
  • Ribeiro MP; Centro Hospitalar do Tâmega e Sousa, Penafiel, Portugal.
  • de Abreu Pereira SC; North Region Health Administration, Lisbon, Portugal.
  • da Conceição Alves Faria A; North Region Health Administration, Lisbon, Portugal.
  • da Silva JMAV; Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, Porto, Portugal.
  • de Sousa CN; Nursing School of Porto (ESEP) and CINTESIS@RISE, Porto, Portugal.
Int J Nurs Pract ; : e13291, 2024 Jul 25.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39051426
ABSTRACT

AIM:

The aim of this study is to test the validity and reliability of the shortened version of the Scale for the Environments Evaluation of Professional Nursing Practice (SEE-Nursing Practice).

METHODS:

This methodological, cross-sectional study was conducted between September and December 2022. The original version of the SEE-Nursing Practice was administered in questionnaire format across 17 hospitals. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to identify relevant items for the new shortened version of the scale and evaluate its construct validity.

RESULTS:

The study involved 1713 registered nurses from various regions of Portugal. From the exploratory factor analysis, the SEE-Nursing Practice was condensed to 59 items and 3 subscales. In the structure subscale, 14 items were removed, and the remaining 29 items distributed over four factors; in the process subscale, 18 items were removed, and the remaining 19 items organized into three factors; in the outcome subscale, 2 items were removed, and the remaining 11 items distributed over two factors. The Cronbach's alpha for the three subscales exceeded 0.90, indicating high reliability. Confirmatory factor analyses provided support for the validity of the 59-item model.

CONCLUSION:

The shortened version of the SEE-Nursing Practice shows adequate validity and reliability, reducing the burden associated with its longer version.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article