Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Analgesia and Anesthesia Practice Patterns for Gynecologic Brachytherapy Procedures and Potential Impact on Women's Procedural Experience: A National Survey.
Rivera, Amanda; Barrios, Dulce M; Herbach, Emma; Kahn, Jenna M; Williams, Vonetta M; Mehta, Keyur J; Wolfson, Aaron; Portelance, Lorraine; Kamrava, Mitchell.
Afiliação
  • Rivera A; Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York. Electronic address: axr2922@med.miami.edu.
  • Barrios DM; Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, New York.
  • Herbach E; Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
  • Kahn JM; Kaiser NW Permanente, Interstate Radiation Oncology Center, Portland, Oregon.
  • Williams VM; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
  • Mehta KJ; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.
  • Wolfson A; Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
  • Portelance L; Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
  • Kamrava M; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39067485
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this study was to determine the current U.S. practice patterns of analgesia (AG) and anesthesia (AS) for gynecologic brachytherapy (BT) procedures. METHODS AND MATERIALS A 27-item survey created with expertise from 5 brachytherapists was distributed electronically to 90 U.S. radiation oncology academic programs and publicized on social media and at 2 national meetings from June to October 2023.

RESULTS:

Forty-one responses were received (46%). Fifty-four percent identified as female, 66% as Caucasian, and 85% as non-Hispanic/Latino ethnicity. Forty-nine percent use a BT suite ± computed tomography (CT) simulator alone, 39% the operating room ± BT suite or CT simulator or other location, 10% CT simulation room alone, and 2% clinic examination room. Thirty-four percent use general anesthesia alone (GA) for intracavitary BT (n = 41), 20% conscious sedation (CS) alone, 10% oral analgesia (OA) alone, 9% spinal or epidural AS alone, and 27% combination. Among those performing hybrid BT (n = 25), 40% use GA alone, 16% use CS alone, 12% epidural or spinal AS alone, 4% OA alone, and 28% combination. For template interstitial BT (n = 25), 44% use GA alone, 48% epidural alone or in combination with other AS, and 8% CS alone. Twenty-two percent of respondents provide AG or AS during applicator placement only, whereas 32% provide it during placement, planning, treatment, and removal. The most common reasons for not using CS or GA were the lack of AS resources and clinician preference. Seventy-three percent reported the belief that patients suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms after BT. However, 68% reported not using techniques to alleviate BT-related emotional distress.

CONCLUSIONS:

Many U.S. brachytherapists report using GA, CS, or epidural AS; however, 10% are using only OA, and 22% offer AG/AS only during applicator placement. Furthermore, a majority of respondents believe post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms can occur after BT, but few offer any intervention. AS resources and clinician preferences should be targeted for the expansion of higher-quality care.

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article