Prognostic Capability of Clinical SYNTAX Score in Patients with Complex Coronary Artery Disease and Chronic Renal Insufficiency Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

ABSTRACT

Background: The SYNTAX score (SS) is useful for predicting clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The clinical SYNTAX score (CSS), developed by combining clinical parameters with the SS, enhances the risk model's ability to predict clinical outcomes. However, prior research has not yet evaluated the prognostic capacity of CSS in patients with complex coronary artery disease (CAD) and chronic renal insufficiency (CRI) who are undergoing PCI. We aimed to demonstrate the prognostic potential of CSS in assessing long-term adverse events in this high-risk patient cohort. Methods: A total of 962 patients with left main and/or three-vessel CAD and CRI were enrolled in the study spanning from January 2014 to September 2017. The CSS was calculated by multiplying the SS by the modified age, creatinine, and left ventricular ejection fraction (ACEF) score (age/ejection fraction + 1 for each 10 mL of creatinine clearance < 60 mL/min per 1.73 m 2 ). The patients were categorized into three groups based on their CSS values low-CSS group (CSS < 18.0, n = 321), mid-CSS group (18.0 ≤ CSS < 28.3, n = 317), and high-CSS group (CSS ≥ 28.3, n = 324) as per the tertiles of CSS. The primary endpoints were all-cause mortality (ACM) and cardiac mortality (CM). The secondary endpoints included myocardial infarction (MI), unplanned revascularization, stroke, and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). Results: At the median 3-year follow-up, the high-CSS group exhibited higher rates of ACM (19.4% vs. 6.6% vs. 3.6%, p < 0.001), CM (15.6% vs. 5.1% vs. 3.2%, p = 0.003), and MACCE (33.8% vs. 29.0% vs. 20.0%, p = 0.005) in comparison to the low and mid-CSS groups. Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that CSS was an independent predictor for all primary and secondary endpoints (p < 0 .05). Moreover, the C-statistics of CSS for ACM (0.666 vs. 0.597, p = 0.021) and CM (0.668 vs. 0.592, p = 0.039) were significantly higher than those of SS. Conclusions: The clinical SYNTAX score substantially enhanced the prediction of median 3-year ACM and CM in comparison with SS in complex CAD and CRI patients following PCI.