Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Establishing Consensus for Mohs Micrographic Surgical Techniques in the Treatment of Melanoma in Situ for Future Clinical Trials: A Modified Delphi Study.
Curtis, Kristen K; Fakult, Nathan J; Strunck, Jennifer L; Aasi, Sumaira Z; Ahn, Christine S; Alam, Murad; Bar, Anna A; Behshad, Ramona; Bichakjian, Christopher K; Bolotin, Diana; Boone, Susan L; Bordeaux, Jeremy S; Brewer, Jerry D; Carr, David R; Carucci, John A; Castillo, Jason R; Christensen, Sean R; Clark, Melanie A; Collins, Lindsey K; Demer, Addison M; Eisen, Daniel B; Feng, Hao; Firoz, Bahar F; Grekin, Roy C; Hirshburg, Jason M; Holmes, Todd E; Huang, Conway C; Jennings, Thomas A; Jiang, Shang I Brian; Konda, Sailesh; Leitenberger, Justin J; Lewin, Jesse M; Maher, Ian A; Ng, Elise; Orengo, Ida F; Samie, Faramarz H; Saylor, Drew K; Sharon, Victoria Rose; Soleymani, Teo; Swetter, Susan M; Tate, Jesalyn A; Van Beek, Marta J; Vidal, Nahid Y; Vij, Alok; Wysong, Ashley; Xu, Yaohui Gloria; Carroll, Bryan T; Yu, Wesley Y.
Afiliação
  • Curtis KK; 1Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH.
  • Fakult NJ; 1Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH.
  • Strunck JL; 2Department of Dermatology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
  • Aasi SZ; 3Department of Dermatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA.
  • Ahn CS; 4Department of Dermatology and Pathology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.
  • Alam M; 5Departments of Dermatology and Otolaryngology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
  • Bar AA; 2Department of Dermatology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
  • Behshad R; 6Department of Dermatology, SLUCare, SSM Health, St. Louis, MS.
  • Bichakjian CK; 7Department of Dermatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
  • Bolotin D; 8Section of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
  • Boone SL; 9Department of Dermatology, University of California, Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA.
  • Bordeaux JS; 10Department of Dermatology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH.
  • Brewer JD; 11Department of Dermatology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH.
  • Carr DR; 12Division of Dermatologic Surgery, Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  • Carucci JA; 13Department of Dermatology, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH.
  • Castillo JR; 14The Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, NYU Langone, New York, NY.
  • Christensen SR; 15Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA.
  • Clark MA; 16Department of Dermatology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
  • Collins LK; 17Department of Dermatology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.
  • Demer AM; 18Department of Dermatology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK.
  • Eisen DB; 12Division of Dermatologic Surgery, Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  • Feng H; 9Department of Dermatology, University of California, Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA.
  • Firoz BF; 19Department of Dermatology, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT.
  • Grekin RC; 20Department of Dermatology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ.
  • Hirshburg JM; 21Department of Dermatology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
  • Holmes TE; 18Department of Dermatology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK.
  • Huang CC; 22Division of Dermatology, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, VT.
  • Jennings TA; 23Department of Dermatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
  • Jiang SIB; 24Department of Dermatology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AK.
  • Konda S; 25Department of Dermatology, University of California, San Diego, CA.
  • Leitenberger JJ; 26Department of Dermatology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL.
  • Lewin JM; 2Department of Dermatology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
  • Maher IA; 27The Kimberly and Eric J. Waldman Department of Dermatology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mt. Sinai, New York, NY.
  • Ng E; 28Department of Dermatology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
  • Orengo IF; 29Department of Dermatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
  • Samie FH; 30Department of Dermatology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.
  • Saylor DK; 31Department of Dermatology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY.
  • Sharon VR; 21Department of Dermatology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
  • Soleymani T; 32Department of Dermatology, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New Hyde Park, NY.
  • Swetter SM; 33Division of Dermatologic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Tate JA; 3Department of Dermatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA.
  • Van Beek MJ; 34Division of Dermatology, Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City, KS.
  • Vidal NY; 35Department of Dermatology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IO.
  • Vij A; 12Division of Dermatologic Surgery, Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  • Wysong A; 36Department of Dermatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
  • Xu YG; 37Department of Dermatology, University of Nebraska, Omaha, NE.
  • Carroll BT; 38Department of Dermatology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
  • Yu WY; 10Department of Dermatology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; : 1-6, 2024 Jul 30.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39079545
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is a promising treatment modality for melanoma in situ (MIS). However, variations in surgical technique limit the generalizability of existing data and may impede future study of MMS in clinical trials.

METHODS:

A modified Delphi method was selected to establish consensus on optimal MMS techniques for treating MIS in future clinical trials. The Delphi method was selected due to the limited current data, the wide range of techniques used in the field, and the intention to establish a standardized technique for future clinical trials. A literature review and interviews with experienced MMS surgeons were performed to identify dimensions of the MMS technique for MIS that (1) likely impacted costs or outcomes of the procedure, and (2) showed significant variability between surgeons. A total of 8 dimensions of technical variation were selected. The Delphi process consisted of 2 rounds of voting and commentary, during which 44 expert Mohs surgeons across the United States rated their agreement with specific recommendations using a Likert scale.

RESULTS:

Five of eight recommendations achieved consensus in Round 1. All 3 of the remaining recommendations achieved consensus in Round 2. Techniques achieving consensus in Round 1 included the use of a starting peripheral margin of ≤5 mm, application of immunohistochemistry, frozen tissue processing, and resecting to the depth of subcutaneous fat. Consensus on the use of Wood's lamp, dermatoscope, and negative tissue controls was established in Round 2.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study generated 8 consensus recommendations intended to offer guidance for Mohs surgeons treating MIS. The adoption of these recommendations will promote standardization to facilitate comparisons of aggregate data in multicenter clinical trials.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article