Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Perineal Urethrostomy for Complex Urethral Strictures: Long-Term Patient-Reported Outcomes from a Reconstructive Referral Center and a Scoping Literature Review.
Klemm, Jakob; Dahlem, Roland; Schulz, Robert J; Stelzl, Daniel R; Filipas, Dejan K; Brömmer, Christian; Shariat, Shahrokh F; Fisch, Margit; Vetterlein, Malte W.
Afiliação
  • Klemm J; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Dahlem R; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Schulz RJ; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Stelzl DR; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Filipas DK; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Brömmer C; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Shariat SF; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Fisch M; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Vetterlein MW; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
J Urol ; : 101097JU0000000000004169, 2024 Aug 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39092698
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

There is a paucity of long-term objective and patient-reported outcomes after definitive perineal urethrostomy for complex urethral strictures. Our objective is to determine comprehensive long-term success of perineal urethrostomy with our 15-year experience at a reconstructive referral center. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Patients who underwent perineal urethrostomy between 2009 and 2023 were identified. A comprehensive long-term follow-up was conducted, evaluating both objective outcomes (retreatment-free survival) and subjective outcomes through the use of validated questionnaires. Additionally, to provide further context for our findings, we conducted a scoping review of all studies reporting outcomes following perineal urethrostomy.

RESULTS:

Among 76 patients, 55% had iatrogenic strictures, with 82% previously undergoing urethral interventions. At a median follow-up of 55 months, retreatment-free survival was 84%, with 16% of patients experiencing perineal urethrostomy recurrent stenosis. Patient-reported outcomes revealed a generally satisfactory voiding function (Urethral Stricture Surgery patient-reported outcome measure Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms score) and continence (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form), with median scores of 4 (range 0-24) and 0 (range 0-21), but with bimodal distributions of sexual function scores (median International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function domain 3.5; median Male Sexual Health Questionnaire-Ejaculation Scale 21). Treatment satisfaction was very high with a median International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Satisfaction outcome score of 21 (range 0-24). The scoping review revealed varying success rates ranging from 51% to 95%, highlighting difficulties in comparison due to variable success definitions and patient case mix.

CONCLUSIONS:

Perineal urethrostomy provides effective treatment for complex anterior urethral strictures, with high patient satisfaction, preserved continence function, and favorable voiding outcomes. It presents a viable option for older and comorbid patients, especially after thorough counseling on expected outcomes and potential risks.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article