Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Risk factors for breast cancer subtypes by race and ethnicity: A scoping review of the literature.
Hurson, Amber N; Ahearn, Thomas U; Koka, Hela; Jenkins, Brittany D; Harris, Alexandra R; Roberts, Sylvia; Fan, Sharon; Franklin, Jamirra; Butera, Gisela; Keeman, Renske; Jung, Audrey Y; Middha, Pooja; Gierach, Gretchen L; Yang, Xiaohong R; Chang-Claude, Jenny; Tamimi, Rulla M; Troester, Melissa A; Bandera, Elisa V; Abubakar, Mustapha; Schmidt, Marjanka K; Garcia-Closas, Montserrat.
Afiliação
  • Hurson AN; Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
  • Ahearn TU; Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
  • Koka H; Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
  • Jenkins BD; Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
  • Harris AR; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Roberts S; Laboratory of Human Carcinogenesis, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
  • Fan S; Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
  • Franklin J; Laboratory of Human Carcinogenesis, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
  • Butera G; Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
  • Keeman R; Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
  • Jung AY; Laboratory of Human Carcinogenesis, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
  • Middha P; National Institutes of Health Library, Office of Research Services, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
  • Gierach GL; Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Yang XR; Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Chang-Claude J; Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Tamimi RM; Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
  • Troester MA; Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
  • Bandera EV; Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Abubakar M; Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
  • Schmidt MK; Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Garcia-Closas M; Section of Cancer Epidemiology and Health Outcomes, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
medRxiv ; 2024 Mar 19.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39108508
ABSTRACT

Background:

Breast cancer is comprised of distinct molecular subtypes. Studies have reported differences in risk factor associations with breast cancer subtypes, especially by tumor estrogen receptor (ER) status, but their consistency across racial and ethnic populations has not been comprehensively evaluated.

Methods:

We conducted a qualitative, scoping literature review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis, extension for Scoping Reviews to investigate consistencies in associations between 18 breast cancer risk factors (reproductive, anthropometric, lifestyle, and medical history) and risk of ER-defined subtypes in women who self-identify as Asian, Black or African American, Hispanic or Latina, or White. We reviewed publications between January 1, 1990 and July 1, 2022. Etiologic heterogeneity evidence (convincing, suggestive, none, or inconclusive) was determined by expert consensus.

Results:

Publications per risk factor ranged from 14 (benign breast disease history) to 66 (parity). Publications were most abundant for White women, followed by Asian, Black or African American, and Hispanic or Latina women. Etiologic heterogeneity evidence was strongest for parity, followed by age at first birth, post-menopausal BMI, oral contraceptive use, and estrogen-only and combined menopausal hormone therapy. Evidence was limited for other risk factors. Findings were consistent across racial and ethnic groups, although the strength of evidence varied.

Conclusion:

The literature supports etiologic heterogeneity by ER for some established risk factors that are consistent across race and ethnicity groups. However, in non-White populations evidence is limited. Larger, more comparable data in diverse populations is needed to better characterize breast cancer etiologic heterogeneity.

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article