Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Fine-tuning inflow prediction models: integrating optimization algorithms and TRMM data for enhanced accuracy.
Ali, Enas; Zerouali, Bilel; Tariq, Aqil; Katipoglu, Okan Mert; Bailek, Nadjem; Santos, Celso Augusto Guimarães; M Ghoneim, Sherif S; Towfiqul Islam, Abu Reza Md.
Afiliação
  • Ali E; University Centre for Research and Development, Chandigarh University, Mohali, Punjab, India.
  • Zerouali B; Laboratory of Architecture, Cities and Environment, Department of Hydraulic, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Hassiba Benbouali University of Chlef, Chlef, Algeria.
  • Tariq A; Department of Wildlife, Fisheries and Aquaculture, College of Forest Resources, Mississippi State University, 775 Stone Boulevard, Mississippi State, MS, USA.
  • Katipoglu OM; Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Department of Civil Engineering, Erzincan Binali Yildirim University, Erzincan, Turkey.
  • Bailek N; Laboratory of Mathematics Modeling and Applications, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, Ahmed Draia University of Adrar, Adrar, Algeria; MEU Research Unit, Middle East University, Amman, Jordan E-mail: bailek.nadjem@univ-adrar.edu.dz.
  • Santos CAG; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Federal University of Paraíba, João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil.
  • M Ghoneim SS; Department of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
  • Towfiqul Islam ARM; Department of Disaster Management, Begum Bekeya University, Rangpur, Bangladesh.
Water Sci Technol ; 90(3): 844-877, 2024 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39141038
ABSTRACT
This research explores machine learning algorithms for reservoir inflow prediction, including long short-term memory (LSTM), random forest (RF), and metaheuristic-optimized models. The impact of feature engineering techniques such as discrete wavelet transform (DWT) and XGBoost feature selection is investigated. LSTM shows promise, with LSTM-XGBoost exhibiting strong generalization from 179.81 m3/s RMSE (root mean square error) in training to 49.42 m3/s in testing. The RF-XGBoost and models incorporating DWT, like LSTM-DWT and RF-DWT, also perform well, underscoring the significance of feature engineering. Comparisons illustrate enhancements with DWT LSTM and RF reduce training and testing RMSE substantially when using DWT. Metaheuristic models like MLP-ABC and LSSVR-PSO benefit from DWT as well, with the LSSVR-PSO-DWT model demonstrating excellent predictive accuracy, showing 133.97 m3/s RMSE in training and 47.08 m3/s RMSE in testing. This model synergistically combines LSSVR, PSO, and DWT, emerging as the top performers by effectively capturing intricate reservoir inflow patterns.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Algoritmos / Aprendizado de Máquina / Modelos Teóricos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Algoritmos / Aprendizado de Máquina / Modelos Teóricos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article