Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Symptom profile of patients with intestinal methanogen overgrowth: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Mehravar, Sepideh; Takakura, Will; Wang, Jiajing; Pimentel, Mark; Nasser, Jason; Rezaie, Ali.
Afiliação
  • Mehravar S; Medically Associated Science and Technology (MAST) Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Takakura W; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
  • Wang J; Medically Associated Science and Technology (MAST) Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Pimentel M; Medically Associated Science and Technology (MAST) Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Karsh Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Nasser J; Medically Associated Science and Technology (MAST) Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Karsh Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Rezaie A; Medically Associated Science and Technology (MAST) Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Karsh Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles, CA. Electronic address: ali.rezaie@cshs.org.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39147218
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

AIMS:

Archaea constitute one of the main three domains of the tree of life, distinct from eukaryotes and bacteria. Excessive luminal loads of methanogenic archaea (intestinal methanogen overgrowth, IMO) have been implicated in the pathophysiology of various diseases, including constipation. To elucidate the phenotypical presentation of IMO, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence and severity of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms in subjects with IMO as compared to subjects without IMO.

METHODS:

Electronic databases, including OVID MEDLINE and Cochrane Database from inception until September 2023, were systematically searched. Prevalence rates, odds ratios (ORs), standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of symptoms were calculated.

RESULTS:

Nineteen studies were included (1293 patients with IMO and 3208 controls). IMO patients exhibited various GI symptoms, including bloating (78%), constipation (51%), diarrhea (33%), abdominal pain (65%), nausea (30%), and flatulence (56%). Patients with IMO had a significantly higher prevalence of constipation as compared to controls (47% vs. 38%, OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.48-2.83, p<0.0001) along with lower prevalence of diarrhea (37% vs. 52%, OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.37-0.90, p=0.01) and nausea (32% vs. 45%, OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.60-0.94, p=0.01). Patients with IMO had higher severity of constipation (SMD 0.77; 95% CI 0.11-1.43, p=0.02) and lower severity of diarrhea (SMD -0.71, 95% CI -1.39, -0.03, p=0.04). Significant heterogeneity was detected.

CONCLUSION:

Patients with IMO exhibit a higher rate and severity of constipation along with lower rate and severity of diarrhea. The distinct phenotype of IMO patients should be incorporated in patient-reported outcome measures and further correlated with mechanistic microbiome studies.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article