Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Complete vs. Culprit-Only Revascularization in Older Patients with ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: An Individual Patient Meta-Analysis.
Campo, Gianluca; Böhm, Feix; Engstrøm, Thomas; Smits, Pieter C; Elgendy, Islam Y; McCann, Gerry; Wood, David; Serenelli, Matteo; James, Stefan; Høfsten, Dan Eik; Boxma-de Klerk, Bianca; Banning, Adrian; Cairns, John A; Pavasini, Rita; Stankovic, Goran; Kala, Petr; Kelbæk, Henning; Barbato, Emanuele; Srdanovic, Ilija; Hamza, Mohamed; Banning, Amerjeet S; Biscaglia, Simone; Mehta, Shamir.
Afiliação
  • Campo G; Cardiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Ferrara, Cona (FE), Italy.
  • Böhm F; Department of Cardiology, Karolinska Institute and Danderyd Hospital, Danderyd, Sweden.
  • Engstrøm T; Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Smits PC; Cardiology Department, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Elgendy IY; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Gill Heart Institute, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY.
  • McCann G; Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK.
  • Wood D; Centre for Heart Valve Innovation, St. Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  • Serenelli M; Cardiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Ferrara, Cona (FE), Italy.
  • James S; Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Høfsten DE; Department of Cardiology, Heart Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Boxma-de Klerk B; Statistics and Education, Franciscus Gasthuis en Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Banning A; Oxford Heart Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
  • Cairns JA; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Pavasini R; Cardiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Ferrara, Cona (FE), Italy.
  • Stankovic G; Department of Cardiology, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia and Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
  • Kala P; The University Hospital Brno, Medical Faculty of Masaryk University Brno, Czech Republic.
  • Kelbæk H; Department of Cardiology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.
  • Barbato E; Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Roma, Italy.
  • Srdanovic I; Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases Vojvodina, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia.
  • Hamza M; Department of Cardiology, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
  • Banning AS; Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK.
  • Biscaglia S; Cardiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Ferrara, Cona (FE), Italy.
  • Mehta S; Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Circulation ; 2024 Sep 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39217603
ABSTRACT

Background:

Complete revascularization is the standard treatment for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel disease. The Functional Assessment in Elderly MI Patients with Multivessel Disease (FIRE) trial confirmed the benefit of complete revascularization in a population of older patients, but the follow-up is limited to 1 year. Therefore, the long-term benefit ( > 1-year) of this strategy in older patients is debated. To address this, an individual patient data meta-analysis was conducted in STEMI patients aged 75 years or older enrolled in randomized clinical trials investigating complete vs. culprit-only revascularization strategies.

Methods:

PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane database, were systematically searched to identify randomized clinical trials comparing complete vs. culprit-only revascularization. Individual patient-level data were collected from the relevant trials. The primary endpoint was death, myocardial infarction (MI), or ischemia-driven revascularization. The secondary endpoint was cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction.

Results:

Data from seven RCTs, encompassing 1733 patients (917 randomized to culprit-only and 816 to complete revascularization), were analyzed. The median age was 79 [77-83] years. Females were 595 (34%). Follow-up ranged from a minimum of six months to a maximum of 6.2 years (median 2.5 [1-3.8] years). Complete revascularization reduced the primary endpoint up to four years (HR 0.78, 95%CI 0.63-0.96), but not at the longest available follow-up (HR 0.83, 95%CI 0.69-1.01). Complete revascularization significantly reduced the occurrence of cardiovascular death or MI at the longest available follow-up (HR 0.76, 95%CI 0.58-0.99). This was observed even when censoring the follow-up at each year. Long-term rate of death did not differ between complete and culprit-only revascularization arms.

Conclusions:

In this individual patient data meta-analysis of older STEMI patients with multivessel disease, complete revascularization reduced the primary endpoint of death, MI or ischemia-driven revascularization up to 4-year. At the longest follow-up, complete revascularization reduced the composite of cardiovascular death or MI, but not the primary endpoint. Clinical Study Registration PROSPERO CRD42022367898.

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article