Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Performance of patient-collected dried blood spot specimens for HIV-1 viral load testing: evidence from the DO ART Study in South Africa.
Sahu, Maitreyi; Schaafsma, Torin; Szpiro, Adam A; Van Rooyen, Heidi; Asiimwe, Stephen; Shahmanesh, Maryam; Krows, Meighan L; Sithole, Nsika; Van Heerden, Alastair; Barnabas, Ruanne V.
Afiliação
  • Sahu M; Department of Health Metrics Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Schaafsma T; Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Szpiro AA; International Clinical Research Center, Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Van Rooyen H; Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Asiimwe S; Human Sciences Research Council, Western Cape, South Africa.
  • Shahmanesh M; Integrated Community-Based Initiatives, Kabwohe, Uganda.
  • Krows ML; Africa Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
  • Sithole N; International Clinical Research Center, Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Van Heerden A; Africa Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
  • Barnabas RV; SAMRC/WITS Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Department of Paediatrics, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa.
AIDS ; 2024 Sep 13.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39264578
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Evaluate the clinical utility of patient-collected dried blood spots (DBS) in measuring HIV-1 viral load (VL) for monitoring antiretroviral therapy (ART) compared to provider-collected DBS and blood plasma.

DESIGN:

In a randomized trial of community-based delivery of ART in South Africa, we assessed performance of (1) DBS specimens compared to plasma, and (2) participant-collected versus staff-collected DBS specimens, to measure HIV-1 VL.

METHODS:

The bioMérieux NucliSENS EasyQ HIV-1 v2.0 assay was used for VL measurement. From October 2017 to November 2019, we collected 996 pairs of plasma/DBS specimens from 760 participants and 315 pairs of staff-/participant-collected DBS cards from 261 participants. We assessed DBS test sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) using the WHO failure threshold of 1000 copies/mL. Log-transformed VL was compared using concordance correlation coefficients (CCC) and mean differences from linear mixed models.

RESULTS:

In a population with 13% detectable VL, DBS VL compared with plasma VL had 91% (95% CI 86-95) sensitivity, 99% (98-100) specificity, 94% (90-98) PPV, and 99% (98-99) NPV. We observed high agreement between staff-collected DBS VL and plasma VL (CCC 0.94), and between participant-collected DBS VL and plasma VL (CCC 0.92). Correlation between participant- and staff-collected DBS was very high (CCC 0.97; mean difference for those with a detectable

result:

-0.10 log 10  copies/mL [-0.21-0.02]).

CONCLUSIONS:

VL results from participant-collected DBS are clinically comparable with those collected by clinical staff and using blood plasma. Self-collected DBS has potential for use for ART monitoring outside the clinic.

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article