Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diabetes self-management education programs: Results from a nationwide population-based study on characteristics of participants, rating of programs and reasons for non-participation.
Weise, Solveig; Du, Yong; Heidemann, Christin; Baumert, Jens; Frese, Thomas; Heise, Marcus.
Afiliação
  • Weise S; Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Medical Faculty, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Saxony-Anhalt, Germany.
  • Du Y; Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Unit Physical Health, Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
  • Heidemann C; Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Unit Physical Health, Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
  • Baumert J; Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Unit Physical Health, Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
  • Frese T; Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Medical Faculty, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Saxony-Anhalt, Germany.
  • Heise M; Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Medical Faculty, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Saxony-Anhalt, Germany.
PLoS One ; 19(9): e0310338, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39264968
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Population-based studies of reasons for not participating in diabetes self-management education (DSME) are scarce. Therefore, we investigated what sociodemographic and disease-related factors are associated with participation in DSME, the reasons for not participating in DSME and how participants evaluate DSME. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

METHODS:

We used data from the nationwide survey "Disease knowledge and information needs-Diabetes mellitus 2017", which included a total of 1396 participants diagnosed with diabetes mellitus (diabetes; n = 394 DSME-participants, n = 1002 DSME-never-participants). Analyses used weighted logistic or multinominal regression analyses with bivariate and multivariable approaches.

RESULTS:

Participants were more likely to attend DSME if they had a medium (OR 1.82 [95%CI 1.21-2.73]),or high (OR 2.04 [95%CI 1.30-3.21]) level of education, had type 1 diabetes (OR 2.46 [1.24-4.90]) and insulin treatment (OR 1.96 [95%CI 1.33-2.90]). Participants were less likely to attend DSME if they lived in East Germany (OR 0.57 [95%CI 0.39-0.83]), had diabetes for >2 to 5 years (OR 0.52 [95%CI 0.31-0.88] compared to >5 years), did not agree that diabetes is a lifelong disease (OR 0.30 [95%CI 0.15-0.62], had never been encouraged by their physician to attend DSME (OR 0.19 [95%CI 0.13-0.27]) and were not familiar with disease management programs (OR 0.67 [95%CI 0.47-0.96]). The main reasons for non-participation were participant's personal perception that DSME was not necessary (26.6%), followed by lack of recommendation from treating physician (25.7%) and lack of information on DSME (20.7%). DSME-participants found DSME more helpful if they had a medium educational level (OR 2.06 [95%CI 1.10-3.89] ref low level of education) and less helpful if they were never encouraged by their treatment team (OR 0.46 [95%CI 0.26-0.82]).

DISCUSSION:

Professionals treating persons with diabetes should encourage their patients to attend DSME and underline that diabetes is a lifelong disease. Overall, the majority of DSME participants rated DSME as helpful.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Educação de Pacientes como Assunto / Autogestão Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Educação de Pacientes como Assunto / Autogestão Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article