RETINAL MIGRATION AND SURGICAL OUTCOME AFTER HEMI-TEMPORAL INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE PEELING VERSUS CONVENTIONAL PEELING FOR MACULAR HOLE: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To investigate the anatomical changes and surgical outcomes of hemi-temporal internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling and conventional ILM peeling for idiopathic macular hole (MH). METHODS: This randomized controlled trial was conducted at 3 centers and included 50 participants with MHs of <400 µm in minimum diameter for a duration of <6 months. All participants had undergone vitrectomy with either hemi-temporal ILM peeling (Hemi group) or 360° ILM peeling (360° group) with an injection of 5% sulfur hexafluoride gas, with or without simultaneous cataract surgery, from July 2017 to January 2021. The rate of MH closure and distance of retinal migration were examined. RESULTS: Of 50 eyes randomized in the 3 centers, the Hemi group comprised 23 eyes, the 360° group 23 eyes, and 4 eyes were eliminated from final analysis. There was a significantly higher rate of primary MH closure in the 360° group (Hemi group 73.9% vs. 360° group 100%, P = 0.009). Retinal migration to the optic disk on the nasal side was significantly shorter in the Hemi group at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively than in the 360° group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in retinal migration to the optic disk on the temporal side. CONCLUSION: Nasal retinal migration in patients who underwent the hemi-temporal ILM peeling method was significantly less than in those who underwent the 360° ILM peeling method. However, less nasal retinal migration did not contribute to the MH closure rate.