Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Caring for dementia caregivers: How well does social risk screening reflect unmet needs?
Winslow, Victoria A; Lindau, Stacy Tessler; Huang, Elbert S; Asay, Spencer; Johnson, Amber E; Borson, Soo; Thompson, Katherine; Makelarski, Jennifer A.
Afiliação
  • Winslow VA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Lindau ST; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Huang ES; Department of Medicine-Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Asay S; Department of Medicine-Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Johnson AE; Department of Medicine - Section of General Internal Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Borson S; Pritzker School of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Thompson K; Pritzker School of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Makelarski JA; Department of Family Medicine, Keck USC School of Medicine, California, Los Angeles, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 2024 Sep 24.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39315491
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Unmet social and caregiving needs can make caregiving for a person with dementia more difficult. Although national policy encourages adoption of systematic screening for health-related social risks (HRSRs) in clinical settings, the accuracy of these risk-based screening tools for detecting unmet social needs is unknown.

METHODS:

We used baseline data from dementia caregivers (N = 343) enrolled in a randomized controlled trial evaluating CommunityRx-Dementia, a social care intervention conducted on Chicago's South Side. We assessed caregivers' (1) unmet social and caregiving needs by querying need for 14 resource types and (2) HRSRs using the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Accountable Health Communities (AHC) screening tool. Using unmet social needs as the reference, we examined the sensitivity of the AHC tool to detect food, housing, and transportation needs. Analyses were stratified by gender.

RESULTS:

Most caregivers were women (78%), non-Hispanic (96%), Black (81%), partnered (58%) and had an annual household income ≥$50K (64%). Unmet social and caregiving needs were similarly prevalent among women and men caregivers (87% had ≥1 need, 43% had ≥5 needs). HRSRs were also prevalent. The most common HRSR was lack of social support (45%). Housing instability, difficulty with utilities and having any HRSRs were significantly more prevalent among women (all p < 0.05). The AHC screener had low sensitivity for detecting unmet food (39%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 27%-53%), housing (42%, 95% CI 31%-53%), and transportation (22%, 95% CI 14%-31%) needs. Sensitivity did not differ by gender for food (41% for women and 30% for men, p = 0.72) or housing (44% for women and 29% for men, p = 0.37) needs. For transportation needs, sensitivity was 27% for women versus 0% for men (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS:

Men and women caregivers have high rates of unmet social needs that are often missed by the CMS-recommended risk-based screening method. Findings indicate a role for need-based screening in implementing social care.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article