Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Utility of pre-procedural [99mTc]TcMAA SPECT/CT Multicompartment Dosimetry for Treatment Planning of 90Y Glass microspheres in patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: comparison of anatomic versus [99mTc]TcMAA-based Segmentation.
Lam, Marnix; Garin, Etienne; Haste, Paul; Denys, Alban; Geller, Brian; Kappadath, S Cheenu; Turkmen, Cuneyt; Sze, Daniel Y; Alsuhaibani, Hamad Saleh; Herrmann, Ken; Maccauro, Marco; Cantasdemir, Murat; Dreher, Matthew; Fowers, Kirk D; Gates, Vanessa; Salem, Riad.
Afiliação
  • Lam M; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Huispostnummer E01.132. Postbus 85500, Utrecht, 3508 GA, The Netherlands. m.lam@umcutrecht.nl.
  • Garin E; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, The Netherlands. m.lam@umcutrecht.nl.
  • Haste P; Nuclear Medicine Department, Eugene Marquis Center, Rennes, France.
  • Denys A; Department of Clinical Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
  • Geller B; Department of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Kappadath SC; Department of Radiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
  • Turkmen C; Department of Imaging Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Sze DY; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Alsuhaibani HS; Division of Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
  • Herrmann K; Department of Radiology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  • Maccauro M; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, and German Cancer Consortium (TKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
  • Cantasdemir M; Nuclear Medicine Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
  • Dreher M; Division of Interventional Radiology, Istanbul Florence Nightingale Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Fowers KD; Boston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, MA, USA.
  • Gates V; Boston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, MA, USA.
  • Salem R; Department of Radiology, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39331131
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Pre-treatment [99mTc]TcMAA-based radioembolization treatment planning using multicompartment dosimetry involves the definition of the tumor and normal tissue compartments and calculation of the prescribed absorbed doses. The aim was to compare the real-world utility of anatomic and [99mTc]TcMAA-based segmentation of tumor and normal tissue compartments. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Included patients had HCC treated by glass [90Y]yttrium microspheres, ≥ 1 tumor, ≥ 3 cm diameter and [99mTc]TcMAA SPECT/CT imaging before treatment. Segmentation was performed retrospectively using dedicated dosimetry software (1) anatomic (diagnostic CT/MRI-based), and (2) [99mTc]TcMAA threshold-based (i.e., using an activity-isocontour threshold). CT/MRI was co-registered with [99mTc]TcMAA SPECT/CT. Logistic regression and Cox regression, respectively, were used to evaluate relationships between total perfused tumor absorbed dose (TAD) and objective response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS). In a subset-analysis pre- and post-treatment dosimetry were compared using Bland-Altman analysis and Pearson's correlation coefficient.

RESULTS:

A total of 209 patients were enrolled. Total perfused tumor and normal tissue volumes were larger when using anatomic versus [99mTc]TcMAA threshold segmentation, resulting in lower absorbed doses. mRECIST ORR was higher with increasing total perfused TAD (odds ratio per 100 Gy TAD increase was 1.22 (95% CI 1.01-1.49; p = 0.044) for anatomic and 1.19 (95% CI 1.04-1.37; p = 0.012) for [99mTc]TcMAA threshold segmentation. Higher total perfused TAD was associated with improved OS (hazard ratio per 100 Gy TAD increase was 0.826 (95% CI 0.714-0.954; p = 0.009) and 0.847 (95% CI 0.765-0.936; p = 0.001) for anatomic and [99mTc]TcMAA threshold segmentation, respectively). For pre- vs. post-treatment dosimetry comparison, the average bias for total perfused TAD was + 11.5 Gy (95% limits of agreement -227.0 to 250.0) with a strong positive correlation (Pearson's correlation coefficient = 0.80).

CONCLUSION:

Real-world data support [99mTc]TcMAA imaging to estimate absorbed doses prior to treatment of HCC with glass [90Y]yttrium microspheres. Both anatomic and [99mTc]TcMAA threshold methods were suitable for treatment planning. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03295006.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article