Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of Radiation Doses for Different Techniques in Fluoroscopy-Guided Lumbar Facet Medial Branch Blocks: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Bakir, Mesut; Rumeli, Sebnem; Ertargin, Mehmet; Teker, Nurettin; Azizoglu, Mustafa; Gazioglu Türkyilmaz, Gülçin.
Afiliação
  • Bakir M; Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Mersin University, Mersin 33343, Turkey.
  • Rumeli S; Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Mersin University, Mersin 33343, Turkey.
  • Ertargin M; Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Mersin University, Mersin 33343, Turkey.
  • Teker N; Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Mersin University, Mersin 33343, Turkey.
  • Azizoglu M; Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Mersin University, Mersin 33343, Turkey.
  • Gazioglu Türkyilmaz G; Pain Clinic, Bursa City Hospital, Bursa 16110, Turkey.
Life (Basel) ; 14(9)2024 Sep 19.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39337962
ABSTRACT
Chronic lumbar facet pain is commonly treated with fluoroscopy-guided facet medial branch blocks (FMBBs). However, the associated radiation exposure of both patients and clinicians is a growing concern. This study aimed to compare radiation doses and fluoroscopy times between two techniques, i.e., oblique and posterior-anterior (PA) fluoroscopic approaches, while also examining the impact of physician experience on these metrics. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 180 patients treated at Mersin University Hospital Pain Clinic between January and July 2024. Patients were divided into two groups 90 received the oblique technique (Group O) and 90 received the AP technique (Group A). Radiation dose and fluoroscopy time data were collected for each patient. The AP technique was associated with significantly lower radiation doses (mean 66 mGy) and shorter fluoroscopy times (mean 28 s) compared to the oblique technique (mean radiation dose of 109 mGy and fluoroscopy time of 46 s) (p < 0.001). Physician experience also influenced these outcomes, with more experienced physicians consistently using less radiation. The AP technique should be considered for FMBBs, as it reduces radiation exposure while maintaining procedural efficiency, highlighting the importance of experience in optimizing outcomes.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article