Comparison of late results of balloon valvotomy in mitral stenosis with versus without mitral regurgitation.

ABSTRACT

Balloon mitral valvotomy (BMV) is safe and effective in patients with mitral stenosis (MS) and coexisting mild mitral regurgitation (MR). Influence of preexisting MR on late outcome of BMV is under evaluation. We included 77 patients without MR and 72 with MR in this study, and compared their immediate and late results in a mean follow-up of 33 +/- 24 months after BMV. Patients with coexisting MR were older and more frequently had significant valvular calcium and atrial fibrillation than patients without MR. After BMV, mitral valve gradient decreased, and cardiac output and mitral valve area by planimetry increased significantly (all p = 0.0001) in both groups. There was no difference in values of mitral valve gradient and cardiac output after BMV between the groups. Mitral valve area was significantly smaller in patients with preexisting MR. During follow-up, there were 11 patients (14%) in the group without MR and 24 (33%) in the group with MR developed cardiac events (p = 0.006). Cumulative event-free survival was 90% at the second year, 87% at the fourth year, and 69% at the sixth year, respectively, in the group without MR versus 78%, 62%, and 37%, respectively, in the group with MR (p = 0.0014). Cox regression showed that preexisting MR was a significant predictor for late cardiac events with a threefold increased hazard risk (p = 0.0025), but age, valvular calcium, echocardiographic score, and cardiac rhythm also played a culpable role. We conclude that preexisting MR is an important risk factor for poor, late outcome of BMV.