[Quantification of left-to-right shunt in atrial septal defect using oximetry, isotopes, and Doppler echocardiography. Is there a method of reference?]. / Cuantificación del cortocircuito de la comunicación interauricular mediante oximetría, isótopos y ecocardiografía Doppler. Existe un método de referencia?

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Determination of pulmonary to systemic blood flow ratio (QP/QS) is considered to be important for the management of patients with atrial septal defect. The QP/QS provides information on shunt severity and is usually determined by three methods: oximetry, first-pass radionuclide angiocardiography and Doppler echocardiography. The aim of the present study was to assess the accuracy and concordance level of these three methods in QP/QS quantification in atrial septal defects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-four adult atrial septal defects patients in whom QP/QS was determined by these three methods with a 6 month interval were studied. Nuclear and echocardiographic post-surgical studies were repeated in 36 patients. RESULTS: QP/QS values determined by the three techniques had a low correlation between them oximetry (r = 0.52; SEE = 0.74); radionuclide angiocardiography (r = 0.40; SEE = 0.79) and Doppler echocardiography (r = 0.72; SEE = 0.57). Radionuclide angiocardiography underestimated QP/QS > 3 (-0.61 +/- 1.21; p < 0.01). Only in 33% of studies there concordance (differences < 0.5) among the three methods and in 58% between two methods. Right ventricular dilatation and tricuspid regurgitation influenced radionuclide accuracy. Nevertheless, the correlation between this technique and echocardiography was satisfactory when the 36 post-surgical were included (r = 0.75); both techniques agreed in the diagnosis of the two cases with residual post-surgical shunt. CONCLUSIONS: Inter-method disparity in QP/QS quantification is high and no method can be used as a gold standard; clinical decisions therefore based on QP/QS quantification by one technique alone are ill-advised.