Landmark identification error in submentovertex cephalometrics. A computerized method for determining the condylar long axis.

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to examine the identification error of certain submentovertex landmarks and to compare three different methods of determining horizontal condylar angulation in submentovertex radiographs. To determine landmark identification error, a random sampling of 12 submentovertex radiographs from preorthodontic patients between the ages of 10 and 17 years was used to determine both intraexaminer and interexaminer reliability. The error associated with the identification of each of 11 landmarks varied between specific landmarks, between the same landmarks bilaterally, and between the vertical and horizontal components of the same landmark. In general, intraexaminer data showed less landmark identification error in both vertical and horizontal directions than did interexaminer data. The foramen spinosum landmarks demonstrated the lowest identification error in both horizontal and vertical direction (intraexaminer), whereas greater identification error was associated with the condylar lateral poles and posterior condylar points (both intraexaminer and interexaminer). A comparison of three different methods of condylar angulation determination was undertaken through the use of two tracings of each of 101 submentovertex radiographs. A computer-derived method representing the principal axis of minimum moment of inertia of the condyle was shown to be more reliable (p < 0.05) with respect to describing condylar angulation than both a method that used a best-fit line through the anterior condylar border and an interpolar axis method.