Which implant is better for the fixation of posterior wall acetabular fractures: A conventional reconstruction plate or a brand-new calcaneal plate?

BACKGROUND: Increased posterior wall acetabular fractures among older adults, require precise treatment to restore stability to the joint, lower the risk of degenerative arthritis, and enhance overall functional recovery. The purpose of this study was to compare the fixation stability and mechanical characteristics of calcaneal buttress plate and conventional reconstruction plate under different loading condition. METHODS: Typical acetabular posterior wall fractures were created on twenty synthetic hemipelvis models. They were fixed with calcaneus plate and reconstruction plate. Dynamic and static tests were performed. Displacements of fracture line and stiffness were calculated. FINDINGS: After dynamic loading, calcaneus plate fixation has significantly less displacement than the reconstruction plate on the superior posterior wall. Under static loading condition, the calcaneus plate group has significantly less displacement than the reconstruction plate group on the inferior posterior part of the fracture. The average stiffness values of the calcaneus plate group and the reconstruction plate group were 265.16±53.98 N/mm and 167.48±36.87 N/mm, respectively and a statistically significant difference was found between the two groups. INTERPRETATION: The calcaneal plate group demonstrated better stability along the fracture line after dynamic and static loading conditions. Especially when the fragment was on the acetabulum's superior posterior, inferior posterior, and inferior rim, Calcaneal buttress plates offer biomechanically effective choices.

Talon cannulated compression device as an alternative in the fixation of acetabulum posterior column fractures: A biomechanical study.

To compare the amount of displacement and rigidity at the fracture line under static & dynamic axial loading and torsional stress of conventional cannulated screw (CS), plate screw fixation including inter-fragmentary screw (PL), and talon cannulated compression device or talon screw in other words (TS) in posterior column fracture models. Synthetic hemipelvis bone models presenting a posterior column fracture were used in this study. Group PL, CS, and TS were created with ten bone models prepared for each group for dynamic and static loading tests and another ten for torsional tests. Rigidity and displacement amounts before and after loading were measured at the reference points AL, BL, and CL, located at the acetabulum's top, middle, and bottom, respectively. Torsional tests for each group were used to calculate torsional rigidity and maximum torque values. In dynamic axial loading tests, Group CS showed more displacement than PL at the BL point (p = 0,032) and Group TS at AL (p = 0,032) and CL (p = 0,004) points. In static axial loading tests, Group CS significantly displaced more than TS at AL and CL points (p = 0,05 and p = 0,014, respectively). Group PL and Group TS exhibited similar behavior in dynamic, static axial loading tests and torsional rigidity. The maximum torque that Group PL could withstand was statistically significantly higher than the other two groups (p <0,001). Talon cannulated screws had promising results in posterior column fractures of the acetabulum, which may decline the need for open surgery for stable fixation.