Multinational Analysis of Marginal Liver Grafts Based on the Eurotransplant Extended Donor Criteria.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcome of marginal liver grafts based on the Eurotransplant extended donor criteria (ECD) criteria. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Eurotransplant uses a broad definition of ECD criteria (age >65 years, steatosis >40%, BMI >30 kg/m2, ICU stay >7 days, DCD, and certain laboratory parameters) for allocating organs to recipients who have consented to marginal grafts. Historically, marginal liver grafts were associated with increased rates of dysfunction. METHODS: Retrospective cohort analysis using the German Transplant Registry (GTR) and the US Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) from 2006-2016. Results were validated with recent SRTR data (2017-2022). Donors were classified according to the Eurotransplant ECD criteria, DCD was excluded. Data were analyzed with cut-off prediction, binomial logistic regression, and multivariate Cox regression. RESULTS: The study analyzed 92,330 deceased brain-dead donors (87% SRTR) and 70,374 transplants (87% SRTR) in adult recipients. Predominant ECD factors were donor age in Germany (30%) and BMI in the US (28%). Except for donor age, grafts meeting ECD criteria were not associated with impaired 1- or 3-year survival. Cut-offs had little to no predictive value for 30-day graft survival (AUROC 0.49 - 0.52) and were nominally higher for age (72 vs. 65 years) in Germany as compared to those defined by current Eurotransplant criteria. CONCLUSIONS: The outcome of transplanted grafts from higher risk donors was nearly equal to standard donors with Eurotransplant criteria failing to predict survival of marginal grafts. Modifying ECD criteria could improve graft allocation and potentially expand the donor pool.

Successful Desensitization with Imlifidase and Daratumumab in a Highly Immunized, Crossmatch Positive, Blood Group-Incompatible Living-Donor Re-Transplant Recipient with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Antiphospholipid Syndrome.

Introduction: The transplantation of highly sensitized patients remains a major obstacle. Immunized patients wait longer for a transplant if not prioritized, and if transplanted, their transplant outcome is worse. Case Presentation: We report a successful AB0- and HLA-incompatible living donor kidney transplantation in a 35-year-old female patient with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and antiphospholipid syndrome. The patient had a positive T- and B-cell complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) crossmatch and previous graft loss due to renal vein thrombosis. We treated the patient with intravenous immunoglobulins, rituximab, horse anti-thymocyte globulin, daratumumab, and imlifidase, besides standard immunosuppression. All IgG antibodies were sensitive to imlifidase treatment. Besides donor-specific HLA antibodies, anti-dsDNA antibodies and antiphospholipid antibodies were cleaved. The patient initially had delayed graft function. Two kidney biopsies (day 7 and day 14) revealed acute tubular necrosis without signs of HLA antibody-mediated rejection. On posttransplant day 30, hemodialysis was stopped, and creatinine levels declined over the next weeks to a baseline creatinine of about 1.7 mg/dL after 12 months. Conclusion: In this case, a novel multimodal treatment strategy including daratumumab and imlifidase enabled successful kidney transplantation for a highly immunized patient with antiphospholipid antibodies.

Minimal Invasive Versus Open Surgery for Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Multicenter German StuDoQ|Liver Registry-Based Cohort Analysis in Germany.

Objective: To compare the outcome of minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) to open liver surgery (OLS) for resection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) on a nationwide level. Background: Colorectal cancer is the third most common malignancy worldwide. Up to 50% of all patients with colorectal cancer develop CRLM. MILS represents an attractive alternative to OLS for treatment of CRLM. Methods: Retrospective cohort study using the prospectively recorded German Quality management registry for liver surgery. Propensity-score matching was performed to account for variance in the extent of resection and patient demographics. Results: In total, 1037 patients underwent liver resection for CRLM from 2019 to 2021. MILS was performed in 31%. Operative time was significantly longer in MILS (234 vs 222 minutes, P = 0.02) compared with OLS. After MILS, median length of hospital stay (LOS) was significantly shorter (7 vs 10 days; P < 0.001). Despite 76% of major resections being OLS, postoperative complications and 90-day morbidity and mortality did not differ. The Pringle maneuver was more frequently used in MILS (48% vs 40%, P = 0.048). After propensity-score matching for age, body mass index, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, and extent of resection, LOS remained shorter in the MILS cohort (6 vs 10 days, P < 0.001) and operative time did not differ significantly (P = 0.2). Conclusion: MILS is not the standard for resection of CRLM in Germany. Drawbacks, such as a longer operative time remain. However, if technically possible, MILS is a reasonable alternative to OLS for resection of CRLM, with comparable postoperative complications, reduced LOS, and equal oncological radicality.