Pressure-controlled versus manual facemask ventilation for anaesthetic induction in adults: A randomised controlled non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Pressure-controlled face mask ventilation (PC-FMV) with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) after apnoea following induction of general anaesthesia prolongs safe apnoea time and reduces atelectasis formation. However, depending on the set inspiratory pressure, a delayed confirmation of a patent airway might occur. We hypothesised that by lowering the peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) when using PC-FMV with PEEP, confirmation of a patent airway would not be delayed as studied by the first return of CO2 , compared with manual face mask ventilation (Manual FMV). METHODS: This was a single-centre, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. Seventy adult patients scheduled for elective day-case surgery under general anaesthesia with body mass index between 18.5 and 29.9 kg m-2 , American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classes I-III, and without anticipated difficult FMV, were included. Before the start of pre-oxygenation and induction of general anaesthesia, participants were randomly allocated to receive ventilation with either PC-FMV with PEEP, at a PIP of 11 and a PEEP of 6 cmH2 O or Manual FMV, with the adjustable pressure-limiting valve set at 11 cmH2 O. The primary outcome variable was the number of ventilatory attempts needed until confirmation of a patent airway, defined as the return of at least 1.3 kPa CO2 . RESULTS: The return of ≥1.3 kPa CO2 on the capnography curve was observed after mean ± SD, 3.6 ± 4.2 and 2.5 ± 1.9 ventilatory attempts/breaths with PC-FMV with PEEP and Manual FMV, respectively. The difference in means (1.1 ventilatory attempts/breaths) had a 99% CI of -1.0 to 3.1, within the accepted upper margin of four breaths for non-inferiority. CONCLUSION: Following induction of general anaesthesia, PC-FMV with PEEP was used without delaying a patent airway as confirmed with capnography, if moderate pressures were used.

Arterial partial pressure of oxygen as a marker of airway closure does not correlate with the efficacy of pre-oxygenation: A prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The prerequisites for the early formation of anaesthesia-related atelectasis are pre-oxygenation with its resulting high alveolar oxygen content, and airway closure. Airway closure increases with age, so it seems counterintuitive that atelectasis formation during anaesthesia does not. One proposed explanation is that pre-oxygenation is impaired in the elderly by airway closure present in the waking state. The extent of airway closure cannot be assessed at the bedside, but arterial partial pressure of oxygen ( Pa O 2 ) as a surrogate variable of the resulting ventilation to perfusion mismatch can. OBJECTIVE: The primary aim was to test the hypothesis that a decreased efficacy of pre-oxygenation, measured as the fraction of end-tidal oxygen (F E' O 2 ) after 3 min of pre-oxygenation, correlates with decreased Pa O 2 on room air. We also re-investigated the influence on F E' O 2 by age. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Two regional hospitals, Västerås and Köping County Hospitals, Västmanland, Sweden, between 30 October 2018 and 17 September 2021. PARTICIPANTS: We included 120 adults aged 40 to 79 years presenting for elective noncardiac surgery. INTERVENTION: An arterial blood gas was sampled before commencing pre-oxygenation. RESULTS: No linear correlation was found between F E' O 2 at 3 min and Pa O 2 or age (Pearson's r  = -0.038, P  = 0.684; and Pearson's r  = -0.113, P  = 0.223, respectively). The mean ±â€ŠSD F E' O 2 at 3 min for the population studied was 0.87 ±â€Š0.05. CONCLUSION: The lack of correlation between F E' O 2 at 3 min and Pa O 2 or age during pre-oxygenation has implications for further studies concerning the interaction between airway closure and atelectasis. After 3 min of pre-oxygenation, F E' O 2 , even in the elderly, indicated a high enough alveolar oxygen concentration to promote atelectasis after induction, therefore, it is still unclear why atelectasis formation diminishes after middle age. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03395782.

Higher age and obesity limit atelectasis formation during anaesthesia: an analysis of computed tomography data in 243 subjects.

BACKGROUND: General anaesthesia is increasingly common in elderly and obese patients. Greater age and body mass index (BMI) worsen gas exchange. We assessed whether this is related to increasing atelectasis during general anaesthesia. METHODS: This primary analysis included pooled data from previously published studies of 243 subjects aged 18-78 yr, with BMI of 18-52 kg m-2. The subjects had no clinical signs of cardiopulmonary disease, and they underwent computed tomography (CT) awake and during anaesthesia before surgery after preoxygenation with an inspired oxygen fraction (FIO2) of >0.8, followed by mechanical ventilation with FIO2 of 0.3 or higher with no PEEP. Atelectasis was assessed by CT. RESULTS: Atelectasis area of up to 39 cm2 in a transverse scan near the diaphragm was seen in 90% of the subjects during anaesthesia. The log of atelectasis area was related to a quadratic function of (age+age2) with the most atelectasis at ∼50 yr (r2=0.08; P<0.001). Log atelectasis area was also related to a broken-line function of the BMI with the knee at 30 kg m-2 (r2=0.06; P<0.001). Greater atelectasis was seen in the subjects receiving FIO2 of 1.0 than FIO2 of 0.3-0.5 (12.8 vs 8.1 cm2; P<0.001). A multiple regression analysis, including a quadratic function of age, a broken-line function of the BMI, and dichotomised FIO2 (0.3-0.5/1.0) adjusting for ventilatory frequency, strengthened the association (r2=0.23; P<0.001). PaO2 decreased with both age and BMI. CONCLUSIONS: Atelectasis during general anaesthesia increased with age up to 50 yr and decreased beyond that. Atelectasis increased with BMI in normal and overweight patients, but showed no further increase in obese subjects (BMI ≥30 kg m-2). Therefore, greater age and obesity appear to limit atelectasis formation during general anaesthesia.

Positive End-expiratory Pressure and Postoperative Atelectasis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) increases lung volume and protects against alveolar collapse during anesthesia. During emergence, safety preoxygenation preparatory to extubation makes the lung susceptible to gas absorption and alveolar collapse, especially in dependent regions being kept open by PEEP. We hypothesized that withdrawing PEEP before starting emergence preoxygenation would limit postoperative atelectasis formation. METHODS: This was a randomized controlled evaluator-blinded trial in 30 healthy patients undergoing nonabdominal surgery under general anesthesia and mechanical ventilation with PEEP 7 or 9 cm H2O depending on body mass index. A computed tomography scan at the end of surgery assessed baseline atelectasis. The study subjects were thereafter allocated to either maintained PEEP (n = 16) or zero PEEP (n = 14) during emergence preoxygenation. The primary outcome was change in atelectasis area as evaluated by a second computed tomography scan 30 min after extubation. Oxygenation was assessed by arterial blood gases. RESULTS: Baseline atelectasis was small and increased modestly during awakening, with no statistically significant difference between groups. With PEEP applied during awakening, the increase in atelectasis area was median (range) 1.6 (-1.1 to 12.3) cm and without PEEP 2.3 (-1.6 to 7.8) cm. The difference was 0.7 cm (95% CI, -0.8 to 2.9 cm; P = 0.400). Postoperative atelectasis for all patients was median 5.2 cm (95% CI, 4.3 to 5.7 cm), corresponding to median 2.5% of the total lung area (95% CI, 2.0 to 3.0%). Postoperative oxygenation was unchanged in both groups when compared to oxygenation in the preoperative awake state. CONCLUSIONS: Withdrawing PEEP before emergence preoxygenation does not reduce atelectasis formation after nonabdominal surgery. Despite using 100% oxygen during awakening, postoperative atelectasis is small and does not affect oxygenation, possibly conditional on an open lung during anesthesia, as achieved by intraoperative PEEP.

Positive End-expiratory Pressure Alone Minimizes Atelectasis Formation in Nonabdominal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Various methods for protective ventilation are increasingly being recommended for patients undergoing general anesthesia. However, the importance of each individual component is still unclear. In particular, the perioperative use of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) remains controversial. The authors tested the hypothesis that PEEP alone would be sufficient to limit atelectasis formation during nonabdominal surgery. METHODS: This was a randomized controlled evaluator-blinded study. Twenty-four healthy patients undergoing general anesthesia were randomized to receive either mechanical ventilation with PEEP 7 or 9 cm H2O depending on body mass index (n = 12) or zero PEEP (n = 12). No recruitment maneuvers were used. The primary outcome was atelectasis area as studied by computed tomography in a transverse scan near the diaphragm, at the end of surgery, before emergence. Oxygenation was evaluated by measuring blood gases and calculating the ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure to inspired oxygen fraction (PaO2/FIO2 ratio). RESULTS: At the end of surgery, the median (range) atelectasis area, expressed as percentage of the total lung area, was 1.8 (0.3 to 9.9) in the PEEP group and 4.6 (1.0 to 10.2) in the zero PEEP group. The difference in medians was 2.8% (95% CI, 1.7 to 5.7%; P = 0.002). Oxygenation and carbon dioxide elimination were maintained in the PEEP group, but both deteriorated in the zero PEEP group. CONCLUSIONS: During nonabdominal surgery, adequate PEEP is sufficient to minimize atelectasis in healthy lungs and thereby maintain oxygenation. Thus, routine recruitment maneuvers seem unnecessary, and the authors suggest that they should only be utilized when clearly indicated. VISUAL ABSTRACT: An online visual overview is available for this article at http://links.lww.com/ALN/B728.

[Atelectasis during general anaesthesia - mechanisms and importance]. / Atelektaser under anestesi ­ uppkomst och betydelse.

In 1985, Dr. Göran Hedenstierna pioneered in the transition of atelectases during anaesthesia from a concept to a clinical entity, using computed tomography to detect "pulmonary densities". These densities were soon to be fully recognized as atelectasis. Most of the conclusions in the original paper are almost 40 years later still scientifically intact: the immediate appearance of atelectasis after induction of anaesthesia in the majority of adult patients, that atelectasis impedes arterial oxygenation by shunting deoxygenated blood, and the efficacy of a positive end-expiratory pressure to oppose atelectasis. The importance of atelectasis in the development of postoperative pulmonary complications is still obscure, as is the concept of protective ventilation. A common denominator in several studies on protective ventilation during anaesthesia is the lack of recognising the importance of the oxygen concentration. The pivotal role of oxygen in the development of atelectasis, and the impact of oxygen in relation to different conditions in the lungs, needs further studies.

Characteristics and definitive outcomes of COVID-19 patients admitted to a secondary hospital intensive care unit in Sweden.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Most published reports of COVID-19 Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients are from large tertiary hospitals and often present short-term or incomplete outcome data. There are reports indicating that ICUs with fewer beds are associated with higher mortality. This study aimed to investigate the definitive outcome and patient characteristics of the complete first wave of COVID-19 patients admitted to ICU in a secondary hospital. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, all patients with respiratory failure and a positive SARS-CoV-2 test admitted to Västerås Hospital ICU between 24 March and July 22, 2020 were included. The primary outcome was defined as 90-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay, number of days with invasive ventilation, need for vasopressors/inotropes, and use of renal replacement therapy. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients were included. Median age (range) was 59 (33-76) and 74% were men. Obesity and hypertension were the most common comorbidities and 45% of the patients were born outside Europe. Ninety-day mortality was 30%. Median ICU length of stay (interquartile range) was 14 (5-24) days and the duration of invasive mechanical ventilation 16 (12-26) days. No patients received dialysis at 90-day follow-up. CONCLUSION: In this cohort of COVID-19 patients treated in a secondary hospital ICU, mortality rates were low compared to early studies from China, Italy, and the United States, but similar to other government-funded hospitals in Scandinavia. A preparatory reorganization enabled an increase in ICU capacity, hence avoiding an overwhelmed intensive care organization.

Minimizing atelectasis formation during general anaesthesia-oxygen washout is a non-essential supplement to PEEP.

BACKGROUND: Following preoxygenation and induction of anaesthesia, most patients develop atelectasis. We hypothesized that an immediate restoration to a low oxygen level in the alveoli would prevent atelectasis formation and improve oxygenation during the ensuing anaesthesia. METHODS: We randomly assigned 24 patients to either a control group (n = 12) or an intervention group (n = 12) receiving an oxygen washout procedure directly after intubation. Both groups were, depending on body mass index, ventilated with a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 6-8 cmH2O during surgery. The atelectasis area was studied by computed tomography before emergence. Oxygenation levels were evaluated by measuring blood gases and calculating estimated venous admixture (EVA). RESULTS: The atelectasis areas expressed as percentages of the total lung area were 2.0 (1.5-2.7) (median [interquartile range]) and 1.8 (1.4-3.3) in the intervention and control groups, respectively. The difference was non-significant, and also oxygenation was similar between the two groups. Compared to oxygenation before the start of anaesthesia, oxygenation at the end of surgery was improved in the intervention group, mean (SD) EVA from 7.6% (6.6%) to 3.9% (2.9%) (P = .019) and preserved in the control group, mean (SD) EVA from 5.0% (5.3%) to 5.6% (7.1%) (P = .59). CONCLUSION: Although the oxygen washout restored a low pulmonary oxygen level within minutes, it did not further reduce atelectasis size. Both study groups had small atelectasis and good oxygenation. These results suggest that a moderate PEEP alone is sufficient to minimize atelectasis and maintain oxygenation in healthy patients.