A novel echocardiographic parameter considering left ventricular afterload during V-A ECMO support.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular stroke work index (LVSWI) and cardiac power index (CPI) account for the haemodynamic load of the left ventricle and are promising prognostic values in cardiogenic shock. However, accurately and non-invasively measuring these parameters during veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) is challenging and potentially biased by the extracorporeal circulation. This study aimed to investigate, in an ovine model of cardiogenic shock, whether Pressure-Strain Product (PSP), a novel speckle-tracking echocardiography parameter, (1) can correlate with pressure-volume catheter-based LVSWI and CPI, and (2) can be load-independent during the flow modification of V-A ECMO. METHODS: Nine Dorset-cross ewes (51 ± 4 kg) were included. After cardiogenic shock was induced, full support V-A ECMO (X L/min based on 60 mL/kg/min) commenced. At seven time points during 24-h observation, echocardiographic parameters as well as pressure-volume catheter-based LVSWI and CPI were simultaneously measured with X and following X-1 L/min of ECMO flow. PSP was calculated by multiplying global circumferential strain or global radial strain, and mean arterial pressure, for PSPcirc or PSPrad, respectively. RESULTS: PSPcirc showed a stronger correlation with LVSWI (correlation coefficient, CC = .360, p < .001) and CPI (CC = .283, p < .001) than other echocardiographic parameters. The predictability of PSPcirc for pressure-volume catheter-based LVSWI (AUC .82) and CPI (AUC .80) was also higher than other echocardiographic parameters. No statistically significant differences were identified between the two ECMO flow variations in PSPcirc (p = .558). CONCLUSIONS: A novel echocardiographic parameter, PSP, may non-invasively predict pressure-volume catheter-based LVSWI and CPI in a load-independent manner in a cardiogenic shock supported by V-A ECMO.

Echocardiographic surrogate of left ventricular stroke work in a model of brain stem death donors.

BACKGROUND: The commonest echocardiographic measurement, left ventricular ejection fraction, can not necessarily predict mortality of recipients following heart transplantation potentially due to afterload dependency. Afterload-independent left ventricular stroke work index (LVSWI) is alternatively recommended by the current guideline; however, pulmonary artery catheters are rarely inserted in organ donors in most jurisdictions. We propose a novel non-invasive echocardiographic parameter, Pressure-Strain Product (PSP), as a potential surrogate of catheter-based LVSWI. This study aimed to investigate if PSP could correlate with catheter-based LVSWI in an ovine model of brain stem death (BSD) donors. The association between PSP and myocardial mitochondrial function in the post-transplant hearts was also evaluated. METHODS: Thirty-one female sheep (weight 47 ± 5 kg) were divided into two groups; BSD (n = 15), and sham neurologic injury (n = 16). Echocardiographic parameters including global circumferential strain (GCS) and global radial strain (GRS) and pulmonary artery catheter-based LVSWI were simultaneously measured at 8-timepoints during 24-h observation. PSP was calculated as a product of GCS or GRS, and mean arterial pressure for PSPcirc or PSPrad, respectively. Myocardial mitochondrial function was evaluated following 6-h observation after heart transplantation. RESULTS: In BSD donor hearts, PSPcirc (n = 96, rho = .547, p < .001) showed the best correlation with LVSWI among other echocardiographic parameters. PSPcirc returned AUC of .825 to distinguish higher values of cardiomyocyte mitochondrial function (cut-off point; mean value of complex 1,2 O2 Flux) in post-transplant hearts, which was greater than other echocardiographic parameters. CONCLUSIONS: PSPcirc could be used as a surrogate of catheter-based LVSWI reflecting mitochondrial function.

Comparative analysis of novel esophageal pressure monitoring catheters versus commercially available alternatives in a biomechanical model of the thoracic cavity.

Transpulmonary pressure can be estimated using esophageal balloon (EB) catheters, which come in a variety of manufacturing configurations. We assessed the performance of novel polyurethane EB designs, Aspisafe NG and NG+, against existing alternatives. We created a biomechanical model of the chest cavity using a plastic chamber and an ex-vivo porcine esophagus. The chamber was pressurized (- 20 and + 20 cmH2O) to simulate pleural pressures. We conducted tests with various EB inflation volumes and measured transesophageal pressure (TEP). TEP measurement was defined as accurate when the difference between pressure within the EB and chamber was 0 ± 1 cmH2O. We computed the minimal (Vaccuracy-min) and maximal (Vaccuracy-max) EB inflation volumes of accuracy. Inflation volumes were further validated using a surrogate method derived by the clinically validated positive pressure occlusion test (PPOT). When the esophageal balloons were filled with inflation volumes within the range provided by the manufacturers, the accuracy of TEP measurements was marginal. Our tests found median Vaccuracy-min across EB of 0.00-0.50 mL (p = 0.130), whereas Vaccuracy-max ranged 0.50-2.25 mL (p = 0.002). Post PPOT validation, median TEP was - 0.4 cmH2O (- 1.5 to 0.3) (p < 0.001 among catheters). The Aspisafe NG and NG+ were accurate in 81.7% and 77.8% of the measurements, respectively. We characterized two new EBs, which demonstrated good benchtop accuracy in TEP measurements. However, accuracy was notably influenced by the precise selection of EB inflation volumes.