Nail changes in kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Nail changes are common complications of end-stage renal disease, and reports of nail changes in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) are rare. Few reports have documented a higher prevalence of onychomycosis in KTR compared with controls, while others found no significant differences. In this study, we investigated the prevalence and nature of nail changes in a large series of KTR. METHODS: Three hundred and two KTR (216 males and 86 females) were included in this study, and the mean transplant duration was 6.57 years (range 1.5 month-23 years). They were screened for the presence of nail changes. Nail clippings were collected when indicated and cultures were performed for patients with suspected onychomycosis. The patients were compared with 302 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (220 males and 82 females). RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-one KTR (40.1%) had nail changes compared with 104 (34.4%) in controls. Onychomycosis, Muehrcke's nail and leuconychia were significantly more common in KTR [23 (7.6%), 13.3 (4.3%), 11 (3.6%), respectively] compared with controls [7 (2.3%), 1(0.3%), 2 (0.66%), P = 0.002, 0.001 and 0.02, respectively]. However, the most frequent nail change among KTR and controls was absent lunula, 90 (29.8%) and 80 (26.5%), respectively P = 0.36. Longitudinal ridging was also a frequent nail pathology among KTR and controls, 21 (6.9%) and 19 (6.3%), respectively, P = 0.74. CONCLUSION: KTR have higher prevalence rates of onychomycosis, Muehrcke's nail and leuconychia than the healthy population. On the other hand, absent lunula could be a normal variation among Egyptian people.

Quantification of circulating endothelial cells in peripheral blood of systemic lupus erythematosus patients: a simple and reproducible method of assessing endothelial injury and repair.

BACKGROUND: Quantification of circulating endothelial cells (CECs) in peripheral blood is developing as a novel and reproducible method of assessing endothelial damage/dysfunction. Accordingly, elevated levels of CECs may be a marker of vascular injury in systemic lupus erythaematosus (SLE). This study was undertaken to assess the blood level of CECs in SLE and to correlate its level with the activity of the disease and to find out the possibility that the presence of increased numbers of CECs can be used as a marker of immune-mediated vessel damage. METHODS: The study included 33 patients with SLE and 20 healthy controls. They were subjected to clinical examination together with laboratory investigations including complete blood count (CBC), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), urine analysis, renal function test, C3, C4, ANA, anti-ds DNA antibody, antiphospholipid (IgM and IgG) antibodies and quantification of CECs in blood. CECs were calculated using flow cytometry after staining with a mouse anti-human CD45 antibody (pan-leukocyte marker), mouse anti-human CD146 antibody (endothelial cell marker) and 7-amino-actinomycin D (7-AAD) viability marker. CECs were defined as the live cells with 7-AAD negative, CD45 negative and CD146 positive. RESULTS: The number of CECs was significantly higher in patients with SLE compared with those in healthy control (mean +/- SD 38.6 +/- 21.2 versus 7.4 +/- 3.4). Furthermore, CECs were correlated positively with SLE disease activity index (SLEDAI) score, ESR and anti-ds DNA. CECs from patients with vasculitic skin lesions, renal and central nervous system (CNS) manifestation were significantly higher than patients free from the previous signs. CONCLUSIONS: An increased number of CECs observed in patients with SLE was associated with the active phase of the disease and may represent a marker of widespread endothelial injury.