High cellularity and mitotic activity in a primary ovarian fibro-thecomatous tumor of a young patient: a diagnostic and clinical challenge.

Purpose ofInvestigation: Solid ovarian tumors represent a clinical challenge, in particular in case of young patients who require a fertility sparing treatment. The authors report a case of hypercellular mitotically active ovarian fibrothecoma in a very young woman, successfully treated with a fertility sparing surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 21-year-old nulliparous woman presented at the present hospital with a 14-cm right ovarian mass, consisting of solid and pseudo-cystic components. There was neither an elevation of tumor markers nor evidence of metastatic disease. A laparotomic right salpingo-oophorectomy was performed. Uterus and left adnexa were preserved. RESULTS: The neoplasm consisted of a prevalent population of spindle-shaped elements and of a minor component of cells with wider cytoplasms, attributable to a thecomatous differentiation. The mitotic activity was focally elevated. Cytological atypia was mild to focally moderate. Clear areas of coagulative necrosis were not observed. At present 48 months after surgery, the patient is alive with no evidence of recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: The authors reported the lesion as a hypercellular and mitotically active fibrothecoma. The uneventful follow-up confirms the low malignant potential of the lesion. Caution is required reporting hypercellular stromal ovarian tu- mors, in order to avoid overdiagnosis and overtreatment, particularly in young patients.

Independent validation of stromal uPA in ABCSG-08: Level 1b evidence for the prognostic value of uPA immunohistochemistry.

PURPOSE: To validate the prognostic role of urokinase-type plasminogen-activator (uPA) and plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 (PAI-1) protein expression in FFPE archived tumor samples when assessed by immunohistochemistry. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fresh-frozen, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples from 303 postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, early breast cancer were investigated. The patients had received 5 years of endocrine therapy in the prospectively randomized ABCSG-8 trial. Immunohistochemistry for stromal uPA and PAI-1 protein expression was correlated with distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: We detected stromal uPA in 132 of 297 tumors (44.4%) and stromal PAI-1 expression in 74 out of 299 samples (24.7%). Co-expression of uPA and PAI-1 was present in 48 of 294 (16.3%) cases. Neither uPA nor PAI-1 expression was associated with tumor size, age, nodal status, grading, or quantitative receptor status. Patients whose tumor stroma expressed uPA protein had a significantly shorter DRFS (adjusted HR for relapse: 2.78; 95% CI 1.31-5.93; p = 0.008 Cox regression analysis) than women without uPA expression. No such association was seen for PAI-1 and the uPA/PAI1 ratio. After a median follow-up of 5.6 years, women with uPA-positive tumors demonstrated significantly shorter DRFS (93.3% vs. 84.8%; p < 0.013 log-rank test), and tended to have a worse OS (83.0% vs. 77.3%; p = 0.106) compared to women with uPA negative tumors. CONCLUSION: This independent validation in archived tumor samples from a large prospective randomized trial confirms the clinical utility of stromal uPA evaluation by immunohistochemistry. This provides level 1b evidence for the prognostic role of stromal uPA in women with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer.

Stromal coexpression of uPA/PAI-1 protein predicts poor disease outcome in endocrine-treated postmenopausal patients with receptor-positive early breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate whether uPA/PAI-1 protein in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast tumor can predict prognosis in early breast cancer (BC). METHODS: 606 women with HR + BC who had ≥5 years of endocrine therapy and in whom tumor tissue was available were included in this analysis. Stromal uPA/PAI-1 protein expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry and correlated with distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Stromal uPA was detected in 292/538 tumors (54.3%) while 269/505 samples (53.3%) exhibited stromal PAI-1. Co-expression of both proteins was found in 163/437 (37.3%) samples. Stromal uPA/PAI-1 co-expression was not associated with tumor size, age, nodal status, grading, or receptor status. Tumor stroma with both uPA and PAI-1 protein expression were more likely to have a shorter DRFS (HR: 1.87; 95%CI 1.18-2.96; p = 0.007) and OS (HR: 1.29; 95%CI 0.93-1.80; p = 0.129) than women without uPA/PAI-1 co-expression. After a median follow-up of 10 years, women with uPA/PAI-1-positive tumors experienced a significantly shorter DRFS (86.5% vs 72.4%; p < 0.001) and OS (70.4% vs 58.9%; p = 0.020) compared to women with uPA/PAI-1 negative tumors. CONCLUSION: Stromal co-expression of uPA and PAI-1 in breast cancer predicts poor DRFS and OS in postmenopausal women with HR + early-stage BC who receive endocrine therapy.