The additive role of 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging to ensure pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To assess the role of 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) in the confirmation of pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-seven cases (53.72 ± 8.53 years) were evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 1H-MRS with choline (Cho) signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) measured followed by histopathology and ROC analyses. RESULTS: Twelve patients had complete response, and 35 patients had residual disease. Mean age was 53.72 ± 8.53 years. The mean tumour size before neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) was 4.21 ± 0.99 cm and after NAC was 0.9 ± 0.44 cm.Positive total choline signal (tCho) was detected in all cases. The mean Cho SNR before NAC was 9.53 ± 1.7 and after NAC was 2.53 ± 1.3. The Cho SNR cut-off point differentiating between pathologic complete response (pCR) and the non pCR was 1.95. Dynamic MRI showed 83.3% sensitivity, 65.7% specificity, 45.5% positive predictive value, 92.0% negative predictive value, and 70.2% diagnostic accuracy. Combined evaluation done by using the dynamic MRI and 1H-MRS showed 91.5% diagnostic accuracy with 75.0% sensitivity, 97.1% specificity, 75% positive predictive value, and 91.9% negative predictive value. ROC curves of Cho SNR showed statistically significant differences between non pCR and pCR with AUC was 0.955, 82.9% sensitivity, 91.7% specificity, 96.7% positive predictive value, 64.7% negative predictive value, and 85.11% diagnostic accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: 1H-MRS improves the diagnostic accuracy in the prediction of the pCR after NAC.

Prospective study of a molecular selection profile for RAS wild type colorectal cancer patients receiving irinotecan-cetuximab.

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to evaluate whether a panel of biomarkers, prospectively analysed might be able to predict patients' clinical outcome more accurately than RAS status alone. METHODS: K-RAS (exons 2, 3, 4) wild type colorectal cancer patients, candidates to second/third-line cetuximab with chemotherapy were prospectively allocated into 2 groups on the basis of their profile: favourable (BRAF and PIK3CA exon 20 wild type, EGFR GCN ≥ 2.6, HER-3 Rajkumar score ≤ 8, IGF-1 immunostaining < 2) or unfavourable (any of the previous markers altered or mutated). After the introduction of N-RAS status (exons 2, 3, 4) only RAS wild type patients were considered eligible. Primary aim was response rate (RR). To detect a difference in terms of RR among patients with an unfavourable profile (estimated around 25%) and patients with a favourable profile (estimated around 60%), with a probability alpha of 0.05 and beta of 0.05, required sample size was 46 patients. Secondary endpoints were progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Forty-six patients were enrolled. Seventeen patients (37%) were allocated to the favourable and 29 patients (63%) to the unfavourable profile. RR in the favourable and unfavourable group was 11/17 (65%) and 2/29 (7%) (p = 0.007) respectively. The favourable group also showed an improved PFS (8 months vs. 3 months, p < 0.0001) and OS (15 months vs. 6 months, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that prospective selection of optimal candidates for cetuximab treatment is feasible and may be able to improve clinical outcome.

Sunitinib adverse events in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Sunitinib, a multi-targeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has demonstrated survival benefit in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC); however, significant adverse events (AEs) have been associated with its use. The significant variation in the reported incidences of AEs has prompted this meta-analysis to quantify the risk and explore associated predictors. METHODS: According to predefined selection criteria, a literature search identified 12 studies that were included in the analyses. RESULTS: The meta-analysis included 5,658 patients; 66 % patients had prior systemic therapy whereas the remaining patients (34 %) received sunitinib in the first-line setting. For any grade toxicity, skin rash, fatigue, diarrhea, and mucositis were the most frequently encountered events (81, 52, 45, and 33 %, respectively). Anemia, neutropenia, or thrombocytopenia of any grade occurred in more than one-third of patients, although grades 3 or 4 were less common. Any grade raised by liver enzymes or serum creatinine occurred in 40 and 44 % of patients, respectively. Meta-regression analyses showed that study size was inversely related to the risk of experiencing fatigue, diarrhea, mucositis, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. In particular, the incidence of AEs was higher when sunitinib was used in pretreated versus naive patients; however, there was no significant difference between the two groups concerning the incidence of laboratory abnormalities. We addressed the limitations of reporting AEs in clinical studies. CONCLUSIONS: The present meta-analysis quantified sunitinib-associated AEs. The derived estimates would be similar to that to be expected from the use of sunitinib in community practice in unselected patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

Increased risk of second lung cancer in Hodgkin's lymphoma survivors: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Patients treated for Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) have a higher risk of developing second lung cancer (SLC) compared with the general population. The aim of this meta-analysis was to quantify such risk and to analyze contributing risk factors in HL survivors. METHODS: According to predefined selection criteria, a literature search identified 21 studies that were included in the analysis. RESULTS: After eliminating overlapping or duplicate data, 793 (76 % males) incidences of SLC were encountered in 74,831 patients (58 % males) with HL over a median follow-up of 11.5 years. The median age at HL diagnosis and the median age at SLC diagnosis were 33.0 and 45.9, respectively. The mean latency between treatment of HL and development of SLC was 11.5 years. The pooled relative risk (RR) of SLC was 4.62 (95 % confidence interval [CI], 3.18-6.70], I (2) = 98 %), with a median absolute excess rate of 10.4 per 10,000 person-years. RR was positively related to study size, male-to-female ratio, institutional versus population-based data sets, and the use of any radiotherapy (RT) or combined modality therapy (CMT), while age at diagnosis of HL was not significant. The highest risk was shown among patients aged 15-24 years (RR = 8.76 [95 % CI, 4.55-16.89]), while the lowest risk occurred in patients ≥55 years at primary treatment (RR = 2.88 [95 % CI, 2.33-3.56]). RR increased by increasing duration of follow-up, reaching the highest value at 10-14 years (RR = 4.17 [95 % CI, 3.62-8.81]), but did not increase after ≥15 years (RR = 4.01 [95 % CI, 2.68-5.98]). RT only, CMT, or chemotherapy only was associated with RR (95 % CI) of 4.88 (3.14-7.60), 5.15 (4.08-6.50), and 2.39 (1.60-3.55), respectively. Patients with SLC demonstrated poor prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: The current meta-analysis provided a detailed estimate of the risk of SLC among HL survivors. The obtained results may provide guidelines concerning lung cancer screening for this population.

Risk of second breast cancer in female Hodgkin's lymphoma survivors: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Women treated for Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) have an elevated risk of developing second breast cancer (SBC) compared with the general population. We planned this meta-analysis to quantify the long-term risk of SBC and analyze the contributing risk factors among HL survivors. METHODS: According to predefined selection criteria, literature search identified 34 studies that were included in the analyses. RESULTS: After eliminating overlapping or duplicate data, 957 incidences of SBC were encountered in 24,505 females with HL over a median follow-up of 14.9 years. The medians: age at the diagnosis of HL, age at diagnosis of SBC, and latency since HL treatment to the development of SBC were 23.7, 35.0, and 17.7 years, respectively. The pooled relative risk (RR) of SBC was 8.23 (95% CI, 5.43-12.47, I² = 96%), with a median absolute excess rate of 22.9 per 10,000 person-years. The RR was found inversely related to age at diagnosis of HL with the highest rate (68.7; [95%CI, 28.08-168.11], I² = 79%), occurred in young patients (≤ 15 years old), where the RR in older women (≥ 40 years old) was not significant (0.55; [95% CI, 0.09-3.52]). Analysis of RR by 5-year increments since the treatment of HL showed that the risk was highest after 15-19 years of latency (13.87; [95% CI, 7.91-24.30], I² = 89%). Analysis of the effect of treatment modalities showed that the RR rates were (4.70; [95% CI, 3.28-6.75], I² = 74%), (5.65; [95%CI, 2.94-10.88], I² = 91%), and (1.19; [95% CI, 0.50-2.82], I2 = 65%), for radiotherapy (RT) only, combined RT and chemotherapy (CT), and CT only, respectively. To investigate the demonstrated heterogeneity, meta-regression analysis was performed when feasible. In most such analyses, the natural logarithm of RR was inversely associated with age at HL diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that, the current meta-analysis provided the most recent comprehensive estimate of the risk of SBC in a broad-range of HL survivors. Younger age at diagnosis proved to be a dominant risk factor. The obtained results would serve providing breast cancer screening recommendations for HL survivors.

Cetuximab-based therapy is effective in chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced and metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Randomized controlled trails (RCTs) where cetuximab added to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy for patients with advanced/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have yielded conflicting results. This meta-analysis intended to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cetuximab-based therapy (CBT) in that setting. We analyzed four eligible RCTs that included 1,003 and 1,015 patients randomized to CBT and control intervention, respectively. As compared with the noncetuximab group, CBT demonstrated an 9% reduction in the risk of disease progression [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.91; (CI = 0.83-1.00); p = 0.06], a 13% reduction in the risk of death [HR = 0.87; (CI = 0.78-0.96); p = 0.005], and an approximately 50% increase in objective response rate [odds ratio (OR) = 1.48; (CI = 1.22-1.80); p < 0.0001]. CBT-related adverse events were similar across comparisons except for toxicities known to be associated with anti-EGFR therapy. CBT produced significant clinical benefit with acceptable toxicity as a first-line strategy in patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC. Further research is needed to identify markers predictive of cetuximab benefit in that disease.

Clinical outcome of panitumumab for metastatic colorectal cancer with wild-type KRAS status: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Panitumumab is a fully human anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody that has a favorable effect on patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) harboring wild-type (WT) KRAS gene. This meta-analysis was planned to quantify the benefit and assess safety. Selected for the analysis were randomized clinical studies that have used panitumumab-based therapy (PBT) for patients with mCRC and where the outcome of patients with WT KRAS was reported. Four eligible studies were analyzed including 1,010 and 1,105 patients who received PBT and the control intervention, respectively. Used in subsequent-line setting, PBT was associated with 42% improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.58; 95% CI, 0.36-0.93; P = 0.02), a non-significant overall survival (OS) benefit (HR = 0.90; [95% CI, 0.76-1.05]; P = 0.18), and a significant increase in objective response rate (ORR) (odds ratio (OR) = 0.67 [95% CI, 1.15-77.98]; P = 0.04). PBT showed no benefit in the first-line setting. Restricted analysis to two studies (first- and second-line setting), where the treatment effect of PBT was prospectively analyzed according to tumor KRAS status, showed significant PFS (HR = 0.77), OS (HR = 0.84), and ORR (OR = 2.06) advantage. Almost all patients' subgroups attained clinical benefit. PBT-related adverse events were similar across comparisons with the exception of toxicities known to be associated with anti-EGFR therapy. This meta-analysis showed significant clinical benefit for PBT for patients with WT KRAS mCRC predominantly when used following prior chemotherapy exposure. The benefit was demonstrated in most subgroup analyses. Further research to better define potential responders is needed.