Longitudinal analysis of users transitioning from the Dexcom G5 to the G6 RT-CGM system in Germany, Sweden and the United Kingdom (2018-2020).

AIMS: Regional variations in the adoption of diabetes technology may be reflected in population-level metrics of glycaemic control. In this observational study, we aimed to assess the glycaemic impacts of transitioning from the Dexcom G5 Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring (RT-CGM) System to the Dexcom G6 in three European countries. METHODS: Anonymised RT-CGM data (uploaded to the Dexcom Clarity app) were from users in Germany, Sweden, and the United Kingdom (UK) who transitioned from G5 to G6 between 9-12 months after G6 launched in 2018. Primary endpoints were percent time in hypoglycaemia, percent time in range (TIR), user retention rates, device utilisation, and urgent low soon (ULS) alert utilisation. Metrics were computed for 3-month intervals in the 2-year study window. RESULTS: In all three countries, the transition from G5 to G6 was associated with a clear decrease in hypoglycaemia. In months 0-3 after transitioning, the median percent time 〈3 mmol/L (54 mg/dL) and 〈3.9 mmol/L (70 mg/dL) decreased by [0.12-0.28] and [0.40-0.43] percentage points, respectively, with another [0.11-0.21] and [0.34-0.65] percentage point decrease in months 3-6 in the three countries analysed. TIR and CGM utilisation were sustained or improved slightly across all countries. At the end of the study window, the retention rate was [88.8-94.8%] and ULS utilization was [83.9-86.9%] in the three countries analysed. CONCLUSIONS: Similar RT-CGM trends were observed across Germany, Sweden, and the UK. Improvements in hypoglycaemia occurred in all countries. The high retention of users may lead to sustained glycaemic benefits associated with RT-CGM use.

G6 continuous glucose monitoring system feature use and its associations with glycaemia in Europe.

AIMS: Current continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices provide features that alert individuals with diabetes about their current and impending adverse glycaemic events. The use of these features has been associated with glycaemic improvements. However, how these features are utilised under real-world conditions has not been well studied. We queried a large database to quantify utilisation of the Dexcom G6 system features and how utilisation impacted glycaemic outcomes within a cohort of European users. METHODS: This 6-month retrospective, observational, large database analysis utilised anonymised data from a sample of 47,784 Europe-based G6 users. Primary outcome measures were associations between utilisation and customisation of High/Low threshold alerts, 'urgent low soon' (ULS) alert, and established CGM metrics. RESULTS: Users in the Germany, Austria, Switzerland region (n = 20,257), the Nordic countries (n = 10,314), United Kingdom (n = 9006), Italy (n = 4747), France (n = 2130) and Spain (1330) were included. All alert features were utilised by >75% of the cohort across all regions/countries and age groups. Enabling the Low alert and ULS alert was associated with lower percentage of time below range compared to disabling the Low alert (p < 0.001). Enabling the High alert was associated with higher percentage of time in range (%TIR) and lower percentage of time above range (%TAR) %TAR compared to disabling the High alert (p < 0.001). Paediatric patients and older adults tended to set a higher threshold for High/Low alerts, while younger adults tended to use lower threshold values for High/Low alerts. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals who utilised the Dexcom G6 features showed better glycaemic control, particularly among those who utilised more sensitive High alert and Low alert settings, than users who did not utilise the system features.

Retrospective Continuous-Time Blood Glucose Estimation in Free Living Conditions with a Non-Invasive Multisensor Device.

Even if still at an early stage of development, non-invasive continuous glucose monitoring (NI-CGM) sensors represent a promising technology for optimizing diabetes therapy. Recent studies showed that the Multisensor provides useful information about glucose dynamics with a mean absolute relative difference (MARD) of 35.4% in a fully prospective setting. Here we propose a method that, exploiting the same Multisensor measurements, but in a retrospective setting, achieves a much better accuracy. Data acquired by the Multisensor during a long-term study are retrospectively processed following a two-step procedure. First, the raw data are transformed to a blood glucose (BG) estimate by a multiple linear regression model. Then, an enhancing module is applied in cascade to the regression model to improve the accuracy of the glucose estimation by retrofitting available BG references through a time-varying linear model. MARD between the retrospectively reconstructed BG time-series and reference values is 20%. Here, 94% of values fall in zone A or B of the Clarke Error Grid. The proposed algorithm achieved a level of accuracy that could make this device a potential complementary tool for diabetes management and also for guiding prediabetic or nondiabetic users through life-style changes.

Mitigation of Rebound Hyperglycemia With Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data and Predictive Alerts.

BACKGROUND: Excess carbohydrate intake during hypoglycemia can lead to rebound hyperglycemia (RH). We investigated associations between RH and use of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rtCGM) and an rtCGM system's predictive alert. METHODS: RH events were series of sensor glucose values (SGVs) >180 mg/dL starting within two hours of an antecedent SGV <70 mg/dL. Events were characterized by their frequency, duration (consecutive SGVs >180 mg/dL × five minutes), and severity (area under the glucose concentration-time curve). To assess the impact of rtCGM, data gathered during the four-week baseline phase (without rtCGM) and four-week follow-up phase (with rtCGM) from 75 participants in the HypoDE clinical trial (NCT02671968) of hypoglycemia-unaware individuals were compared. To assess the impact of predictive alerts, we identified a convenience sample of 24 518 users of an rtCGM system without predictive alerts who transitioned to a system whose predictive alert signals an SGV ≤55 mg/dL within 20 minutes (Dexcom G5 and G6, respectively). RH events from periods of blinded versus unblinded rtCGM wear and from periods of G5 and G6 wear were compared with paired t tests. RESULTS: Compared to RH events in the HypoDE baseline phase, the mean frequency, duration, and severity of events fell by 14%, 12%, and 23%, respectively, in the follow-up phase (all P < .05). Compared to RH events during G5 use, the mean frequency, duration, and severity of events fell by 7%, 8%, and 13%, respectively, during G6 use (all P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Rebound hypreglycemia can be objectively quantified and mitigated with rtCGM and rtCGM-based predictive alerts.

Simple Linear Support Vector Machine Classifier Can Distinguish Impaired Glucose Tolerance Versus Type 2 Diabetes Using a Reduced Set of CGM-Based Glycemic Variability Indices.

BACKGROUND: Many glycemic variability (GV) indices exist in the literature. In previous works, we demonstrated that a set of GV indices, extracted from continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data, can distinguish between stages of diabetes progression. We showed that 25 indices driving a logistic regression classifier can differentiate between healthy and nonhealthy individuals; whereas 37 GV indices and four individual parameters, feeding a polynomial-kernel support vector machine (SVM), can further distinguish between impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). The latter approach has some limitations to interpretability (complex model, extensive index pool). In this article, we try to obtain the same performance with a simpler classifier and a parsimonious subset of indices. METHODS: We analyzed the data of 62 subjects with IGT or T2D. We selected 17 interpretable GV indices and four parameters (age, sex, BMI, waist circumference). We trained a SVM on the data of a baseline visit and tested it on the follow-up visit, comparing the results with the state-of-art methods. RESULTS: The linear SVM fed by a reduced subset of 17 GV indices and four basic parameters achieved 82.3% accuracy, only marginally worse than the reference 87.1% (41-features polynomial-kernel SVM). Cross-validation accuracies were comparable (69.6% vs 72.5%). CONCLUSION: The proposed SVM fed by 17 GV indices and four parameters can differentiate between IGT and T2D. Using a simpler model and a parsimonious set of indices caused only a slight accuracy deterioration, with significant advantages in terms of interpretability.

Calibration of Minimally Invasive Continuous Glucose Monitoring Sensors: State-of-The-Art and Current Perspectives.

Minimally invasive continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) sensors are wearable medical devices that provide real-time measurement of subcutaneous glucose concentration. This can be of great help in the daily management of diabetes. Most of the commercially available CGM devices have a wire-based sensor, usually placed in the subcutaneous tissue, which measures a "raw" current signal via a glucose-oxidase electrochemical reaction. This electrical signal needs to be translated in real-time to glucose concentration through a calibration process. For such a scope, the first commercialized CGM sensors implemented simple linear regression techniques to fit reference glucose concentration measurements periodically collected by fingerprick. On the one hand, these simple linear techniques required several calibrations per day, with the consequent patient's discomfort. On the other, only a limited accuracy was achieved. This stimulated researchers to propose, over the last decade, more sophisticated algorithms to calibrate CGM sensors, resorting to suitable signal processing, modelling, and machine-learning techniques. This review paper will first contextualize and describe the calibration problem and its implementation in the first generation of CGM sensors, and then present the most recently-proposed calibration algorithms, with a perspective on how these new techniques can influence future CGM products in terms of accuracy improvement and calibration reduction.

Toward Calibration-Free Continuous Glucose Monitoring Sensors: Bayesian Calibration Approach Applied to Next-Generation Dexcom Technology.

BACKGROUND: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) sensors need to be calibrated twice/day by using self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) samples. Recently, to reduce the calibration frequency, we developed an online calibration algorithm based on a multiple-day model of sensor time variability and Bayesian parameter estimation. When applied to Dexcom G4 Platinum (DG4P) sensor data, the algorithm allowed the frequency of calibrations to be reduced to one-every-four-days without significant worsening of sensor accuracy. The aim of this study is to assess the same methodology on raw CGM data acquired by a next-generation Dexcom CGM sensor prototype and compare the results with that obtained on DG4P. METHODS: The database consists of 55 diabetic subjects monitored for 10 days by a next-generation Dexcom CGM sensor prototype. The new calibration algorithm is assessed, retrospectively, by simulating an online procedure using progressively fewer SMBG samples until zero. Accuracy is evaluated with mean absolute relative differences (MARD) between blood glucose versus CGM values. RESULTS: The one-per-day and one-every-two-days calibration scenarios in the next-generation CGM data have an accuracy of 8.5% MARD (vs. 11.59% of DG4P) and 8.4% MARD (vs. 11.63% of DG4P), respectively. Accuracy slightly worsens to 9.2% (vs. 11.62% of DG4P) when calibrations are reduced to one-every-four-days. The calibration-free scenario results in 9.3% MARD (vs. 12.97% of DG4P). CONCLUSIONS: In next-generation Dexcom CGM sensor data, the use of an online calibration algorithm based on a multiple-day model of sensor time variability and Bayesian parameter estimation aids in the shift toward a calibration-free scenario with even better results than those obtained in present-generation sensors.

A Model of Acetaminophen Pharmacokinetics and its Effect on Continuous Glucose Monitoring Sensor Measurements.

Some of commercial continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices, i.e., minimally-invasive sensors able to measure almost continuously glucose concentration in the subcutaneous tissue, recently received the regulatory approval to be used for making therapeutic decisions in diabetes management. A fundamental requirement for its safe and effective use is represented by the accuracy of CGM measurements. However, despite recent advances in sensors accuracy and reliability, CGM still suffers from inaccuracy problems in presence of pharmacologic interferences, e.g., the common orally administered acetaminophen (APAP), which artificially raises CGM glucose readings for several hours. A model of the artifact induced by APAP on CGM measurements would be useful to design algorithms to compensate such a distortion. The aim of this work is to exploit the data published by previous literature studies to design a model of oral APAP pharmacokinetics and its effect on glucose concentration measured by CGM sensors. Specifically, the developed model was identified on average data of both plasma APAP concentration and the APAP effect on CGM profiles after an oral administration of 1000 mg of APAP. The APAP effect on CGM readings was estimated from the difference observed, in the same study, between the glucose profile measured by a Dexcom G4 Platinum sensor and the plasma glucose concentration. The model was validated by comparing the simulated effect of mealtime APAP administration in CGM measurements of 100 virtual subjects generated by the UVA/Padova Type 1 Diabetes (TID) Simulator vs. the effect observed in a clinical study by Maahs et al. (Diabetes Care, 2015) in 40 TID subjects taking APAP at breakfast. Results suggest that the proposed model is able to reliably describe the mean APAP effect on CGM measurements.

Reduction of Blood Glucose Measurements to Calibrate Subcutaneous Glucose Sensors: A Bayesian Multiday Framework.

OBJECTIVE: In most continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices used for diabetes management, the electrical signal measured by the sensor is transformed to glucose concentration by a calibration function whose parameters are estimated using self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) samples. The calibration function is usually a linear model approximating the nonlinear relationship between electrical signal and glucose concentration in certain time intervals. Thus, CGM devices require frequent calibrations, usually twice a day. The aim here is to develop a new method able to reduce the frequency of calibrations. METHODS: The algorithm is based on a multiple-day model of sensor time-variability with second-order statistical priors on its unknown parameters. In an online setting, these parameters are numerically determined by the Bayesian estimation exploiting SMBG sparsely collected by the patient. The method is assessed retrospectively on 108 CGM signals acquired for 7 days by the Dexcom G4 Platinum sensor, testing progressively less-calibration scenarios. RESULTS: Despite the reduction of calibration frequency (on average from 2/day to 0.25/day), the method shows a statistically significant accuracy improvement compared to manufacturer calibration, e.g., mean absolute relative difference when compared to a laboratory reference decreases from 12.83% to 11.62% (p-value of 0.006). CONCLUSION: The methodology maintains (sometimes improves) CGM sensor accuracy compared to that of the original manufacturer, while reducing the frequency of calibrations. SIGNIFICANCE: Reducing the need of calibrations facilitates the adoption of CGM technology both in terms of ease of use and cost, an obvious prerequisite for its use as replacement of traditional SMBG devices.

Continuous Glucose Monitoring: Current Use in Diabetes Management and Possible Future Applications.

The recent announcement of the production of new low-cost continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) sensors, the approval of marketed CGM sensors for making treatment decisions, and new reimbursement criteria have the potential to revolutionize CGM use. After briefly summarizing current CGM applications, we discuss how, in our opinion, these changes are expected to extend CGM utilization beyond diabetes patients, for example, to subjects with prediabetes or even healthy individuals. We also elaborate on how the integration of CGM data with other relevant information, for example, health records and other medical device/wearable sensor data, will contribute to creating a digital data ecosystem that will improve our understanding of the etiology and complications of diabetes and will facilitate the development of data analytics for personalized diabetes management and prevention.

Glycaemic variability-based classification of impaired glucose tolerance vs. type 2 diabetes using continuous glucose monitoring data.

Many glycaemic variability (GV) indices extracted from continuous glucose monitoring systems data have been proposed for the characterisation of various aspects of glucose concentration profile dynamics in both healthy and non-healthy individuals. However, the inter-index correlations have made it difficult to reach a consensus regarding the best applications or a subset of indices for clinical scenarios, such as distinguishing subjects according to diabetes progression stage. Recently, a logistic regression-based method was used to address the basic problem of differentiating between healthy subjects and those affected by impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) or type 2 diabetes (T2D) in a pool of 25 GV-based indices. Whereas healthy subjects were classified accurately, the distinction between patients with IGT and T2D remained critical. In the present work, by using a dataset of CGM time-series collected in 62 subjects, we developed a polynomial-kernel support vector machine-based approach and demonstrated the ability to distinguish between subjects affected by IGT and T2D based on a pool of 37 GV indices complemented by four basic parameters-age, sex, BMI, and waist circumference-with an accuracy of 87.1%.

Diabetes and Prediabetes Classification Using Glycemic Variability Indices From Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data.

BACKGROUND: Tens of glycemic variability (GV) indices are available in the literature to characterize the dynamic properties of glucose concentration profiles from continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) sensors. However, how to exploit the plethora of GV indices for classifying subjects is still controversial. For instance, the basic problem of using GV indices to automatically determine if the subject is healthy rather than affected by impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) or type 2 diabetes (T2D), is still unaddressed. Here, we analyzed the feasibility of using CGM-based GV indices to distinguish healthy from IGT&T2D and IGT from T2D subjects by means of a machine-learning approach. METHODS: The data set consists of 102 subjects belonging to three different classes: 34 healthy, 39 IGT, and 29 T2D subjects. Each subject was monitored for a few days by a CGM sensor that produced a glucose profile from which we extracted 25 GV indices. We used a two-step binary logistic regression model to classify subjects. The first step distinguishes healthy subjects from IGT&T2D, the second step classifies subjects into either IGT or T2D. RESULTS: Healthy subjects are distinguished from subjects with diabetes (IGT&T2D) with 91.4% accuracy. Subjects are further subdivided into IGT or T2D classes with 79.5% accuracy. Globally, the classification into the three classes shows 86.6% accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Even with a basic classification strategy, CGM-based GV indices show good accuracy in classifying healthy and subjects with diabetes. The classification into IGT or T2D seems, not surprisingly, more critical, but results encourage further investigation of the present research.

From Two to One Per Day Calibration of Dexcom G4 Platinum by a Time-Varying Day-Specific Bayesian Prior.

BACKGROUND: In the DexCom G4 Platinum (DG4P) continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) sensor, the raw current signal generated by glucose-oxidase is transformed to glucose concentration by a calibration function whose parameters are periodically updated by matching self-monitoring of blood glucose references, usually twice a day, to compensate for sensor variability in time. The aim of this work is to reduce DG4P calibration frequency to once a day by a recently proposed Bayesian calibration algorithm, which employs a time-varying calibration function and suitable day-specific priors. METHODS: The database consists of 57 CGM signals that are collected by the DG4P for 7 days. The Bayesian calibration algorithm is used to calibrate the raw current signal following two different schedules, that is, two and one calibration per day. Calibrated glycemic profiles are compared with those originally acquired by the manufacturer, on days 1, 4, and 7, where frequent blood glucose references were available, by using standard metrics, that is, mean absolute relative difference (MARD), percentage of accurate glucose estimates, and percentage of data in the A-zone of Clarke Error Grid. RESULTS: The one per day Bayesian calibration algorithm has accuracy similar to that of two per day (11.8% vs. 11.7% MARD, respectively), and it is statistically better (P-value of 0.0411) than the manufacturer calibration algorithm, which requires two calibrations per day (13.1% MARD). CONCLUSIONS: A Bayesian calibration algorithm employing a time-varying calibration function and suitable priors enables a reduction of the calibrations of DG4P sensor from two to one per day.