Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Malar J ; 18(1): 153, 2019 Apr 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31039788

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Insecticide-treated net (ITN) durability, measured through physical integrity and bioefficacy, must be accurately assessed in order to plan the timely replacement of worn out nets and guide procurement of longer-lasting, cost-effective nets. World Health Organization (WHO) guidance advises that new intervention class ITNs be assessed 3 years after distribution, in experimental huts. In order to obtain information on whole-net efficacy cost-effectively and with adequate replication, a new bioassay, the Ifakara Ambient Chamber Test (I-ACT), a semi-field whole net assay baited with human host, was compared to established WHO durability testing methods. METHODS: Two experiments were conducted using pyrethroid-susceptible female adult Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto comparing bioefficacy of Olyset®, PermaNet® 2.0 and NetProtect® evaluated by I-ACT and WHO cone and tunnel tests. In total, 432 nets (144/brand) were evaluated using I-ACT and cone test. Olyset® nets (132/144) that did not meet the WHO cone test threshold criteria (≥ 80% mortality or ≥ 95% knockdown) were evaluated using tunnel tests with threshold criteria of ≥ 80% mortality or ≥ 90% feeding inhibition for WHO tunnel and I-ACT. Pass rate of nets tested by WHO combined standard WHO bioassays (cone/tunnel tests) was compared to pass in I-ACT only by net brand and time after distribution. RESULTS: Overall, more nets passed WHO threshold criteria when tested with I-ACT than with standard WHO bioassays 92% vs 69%, (OR: 4.1, 95% CI 3.5-4.7, p < 0.0001). The proportion of Olyset® nets that passed differed if WHO 2005 or WHO 2013 LN testing guidelines were followed: 77% vs 71%, respectively. Based on I-ACT results, PermaNet® 2.0 and NetProtect® demonstrated superior mortality and non-inferior feeding inhibition to Olyset® over 3 years of field use in Tanzania. CONCLUSION: Ifakara Ambient Chamber Test may have use for durability studies and non-inferiority testing of new ITN products. It measures composite bioefficacy and physical integrity with both mortality and feeding inhibition endpoints, using fewer mosquitoes than standard WHO bioassays (cone and tunnel tests). The I-ACT is a high-throughput assay to evaluate ITN products that work through either contact toxicity or feeding inhibition. I-ACT allows mosquitoes to interact with a host sleeping underneath a net as encountered in the field, without risk to human participants.


Assuntos
Bioensaio/métodos , Mosquiteiros Tratados com Inseticida/normas , Animais , Anopheles , Bioensaio/normas , Feminino , Humanos , Mosquiteiros Tratados com Inseticida/economia , Malária/prevenção & controle , Controle de Mosquitos/métodos , Piretrinas/farmacologia , Tanzânia , Organização Mundial da Saúde
2.
Transfusion ; 42(2): 146-52, 2002 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11896327

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite extensive reductions in risk, donor selection and testing cannot eliminate pathogen transmission. The objective of this study was to evaluate clinically the viability of pathogen-inactivated RBCs. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Twelve healthy subjects each donated two units of blood that were handled as additive system control units or were inactivated using the PEN110 process (INACTINE, V.I. Technologies) in randomized order. PEN110, which inactivates pathogens by reacting with nucleic acid bases, was incubated with RBCs for 6 hours, followed by washing and quenching with sodium thiosulfate. Radiolabeled RBC recovery and survival determinations were undertaken after 28 days of storage; biochemical and hematologic variables were assessed over 42 days. RESULTS: After 28 days, treated units had a 24-hour double-label ((51)Cr/(99m)Tc) recovery (85.0 +/- 5.0%) that was indistinguishable from control units (85.9 +/- 2.7%); the times required for reduction of radioactivity of labeled cells to half the Day 1 activity (T(50)) were similar for both groups (treated, 31.9 +/- 8.2 days; control, 32.9 +/- 3.3 days). No deleterious effects of PEN110 treatment were found on RBC antigens tested. Treatment reduced 2,3-DPG levels by half and slightly lowered pH levels. Throughout the 42-day storage period, treated RBCs had a lower level of lactate production and a trend toward lower glucose consumption. Hemolysis remained below 1 percent; supernatant potassium and ATP levels were lower than those seen in control RBCs. CONCLUSION: PEN110-treated RBCs stored for 28 days meet all critical requirements for therapeutically useful units.


Assuntos
Doadores de Sangue , Desinfecção , Eritrócitos/química , Eritrócitos/fisiologia , Poliaminas/química , 2,3-Difosfoglicerato/sangue , Sistema ABO de Grupos Sanguíneos/análise , Trifosfato de Adenosina/sangue , Adulto , Glicemia/análise , Preservação de Sangue , Estudos Cross-Over , Envelhecimento Eritrocítico/efeitos dos fármacos , Eritrócitos/virologia , Feminino , Hemólise , Humanos , Concentração de Íons de Hidrogênio , Ácido Láctico/sangue , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Poliaminas/efeitos adversos , Poliaminas/farmacologia , Potássio/sangue , Sistema do Grupo Sanguíneo Rh-Hr/análise
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA