RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The SIMS-Trial (ISRCTN81072971) proved the effectiveness, in terms of patient's knowledge and care satisfaction, of an add-on information aid (personal interview with a physician using a navigable CD and take-home booklet) in 120 newly diagnosed patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) from five Italian centres. OBJECTIVE: To scrutinize the experience of SIMS-Trial participants in order to gain better understanding of the effectiveness of the information aid and its components. DESIGN: We performed (i) nine individual semi-structured interviews with a purposeful sample of SIMS-Trial patients who received the information aid, (ii) focus group meeting (FGM) with the physicians who conducted the personal interview, and (iii) FGM with patients' caring neurologists. RESULTS: Patients' experience with the information aid was positive as it enhanced their understanding of their disease, being viewed as a guided tour of their medical condition. The physicians who conducted the personal interviews were also positive in their overall evaluation but noted an initial difficulty in using the CD. The caring neurologists had limited direct experience of the aid, and their views were confined to utility of the information aid in general. All participants considered the combination of personal interview, CD navigation and take-home booklet essential, but urged a more flexible scheduling of the personal interview. It also emerged that some content required revision and that the aid was unsuitable for patients with primary progressive MS. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study further support the value of the aid and also provide important indications for improving it and refining indications for use.
Assuntos
Esclerose Múltipla/terapia , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Pacientes/psicologia , Médicos/psicologia , Adulto , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The purpose pf the current article is to describe the clinical profile, use of resources, management and outcome in a population of real-world inpatients with heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: With a prospective, cross-sectional survey on acute hospital admissions, we evaluated the overall and provider-related differences in patient characteristics, diagnostic work-up, treatment and inhospital outcome of 2127 patients with heart failure admitted to 167 cardiology departments and 250 internal medicine departments between February 14 and 25, 2000. Patients admitted to cardiology units were younger (56.3% >70 years vs 76.2%, P <.0001), had more severe symptoms (NYHA IV 35% vs 29%, P =.00014), and more often underwent evaluation of ventricular function (89.3% vs 54.8%, P <.0001) and coronary angiography (7.5% vs 0.9%, P <.0001) than those admitted to medical units. Moreover, they were more often prescribed beta-blockers (17.8% vs 8.7%, P <.0001). However, prescription of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin-receptor blockers (78.7% vs 81.5%, P = not significant [NS]) and inhospital mortality (5.2% vs 5.9%, P = NS) were similar. A 6-month follow-up visit was performed in 56.4% of cases (68.2% of cardiology vs 49.4% of medicine patients, P <.0001); 6-month readmission (43.7% vs 45.4%, P = NS) and mortality (13.9% vs 16.7%, P = NS) rates were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with heart failure admitted to cardiology and internal medicine units represent 2 clearly different populations. In both groups, diagnostic procedures and evidence-based treatments, such as beta-blockers, appeared to be underused, and there was a lack of structured follow-up, as well as a poor 6-month prognosis.
Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/tratamento farmacológico , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina , Inibidores da Enzima Conversora de Angiotensina/uso terapêutico , Unidades de Cuidados Coronarianos/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Seguimentos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/mortalidade , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Medicina Interna/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Chronic kidney disease is common in patients with chronic heart failure and has important clinical implications. The coexistence of these two syndromes is associated with a higher risk of adverse outcome and increases the difficulties of heart failure treatment because of the complex interplay between renal dysfunction and pharmacologic therapy. The underrepresentation of patients with chronic kidney disease in most heart failure trials contributes to the suboptimal treatment of this high-risk population in clinical practice. In the present review, we briefly examine the pathophysiologic mechanisms connecting chronic kidney disease and chronic heart failure and discuss the therapeutic approach to patients affected by both conditions.