Sex-Based Differences in the Epidemiology, Clinical Characteristics, and Outcomes Associated with Worsening Heart Failure Events in a Learning Health System.

BACKGROUND: Differences in demographics, risk factors, and clinical characteristics may contribute to variations in men and women in terms of the prevalence, clinical setting, and outcomes associated with worsening heart failure (WHF) events. We sought to describe sex-based differences in the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and outcomes associated with WHF events across clinical settings. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined adults diagnosed with HF from 2010 to 2019 within a large, integrated health care delivery system. Electronic health record data were accessed for hospitalizations, emergency department (ED) visits and observation stays, and outpatient encounters. WHF was identified using validated natural language processing algorithms and defined as ≥1 symptom, ≥2 objective findings (including ≥1 sign), and ≥1 change in HF-related therapy. Incidence rates and associated outcomes for WHF were compared across care setting by sex. We identified 1,122,368 unique clinical encounters with a diagnosis code for HF, with 124,479 meeting WHF criteria. These WHF encounters existed among 102,116 patients, of whom 48,543 (47.5%) were women and 53,573 (52.5%) were men. Women experiencing WHF were older and more likely to have HF with preserved ejection fraction compared with men. The clinical settings of WHF were similar among women and men: hospitalizations (36.8% vs 37.7%), ED visits or observation stays (11.8% vs 13.4%), and outpatient encounters (4.4% vs 4.9%). Women had lower odds of 30-day mortality after an index hospitalization (adjusted odds ratio 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.83-0.93) or ED visit or observation stay (adjusted odds ratio 0.86, 95% confidence interval 0.75-0.98) for WHF. CONCLUSIONS: Women and men contribute similarly to WHF events across diverse clinical settings despite marked differences in age and left ventricular ejection fraction.

Association Between Participation in a Heart Failure Telemonitoring Program and Health Care Utilization and Death Within an Integrated Health Care Delivery System.

BACKGROUND: The clinical usefulness of remote telemonitoring to reduce postdischarge health care use and death in adults with heart failure (HF) remains controversial. METHODS AND RESULTS: Within a large integrated health care delivery system, we matched patients enrolled in a postdischarge telemonitoring intervention from 2015 to 2019 to patients not receiving telemonitoring at up to a 1:4 ratio on age, sex, and calipers of a propensity score. Primary outcomes were readmissions for worsening HF and all-cause death within 30, 90, and 365 days of the index discharge; secondary outcomes were all-cause readmissions and any outpatient diuretic dose adjustments. We matched 726 patients receiving telemonitoring to 1985 controls not receiving telemonitoring, with a mean age of 75 ± 11 years and 45% female. Patients receiving telemonitoring did not have a significant reduction in worsening HF hospitalizations (adjusted rate ratio [aRR] 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68-1.33), all-cause death (adjusted hazard ratio 0.60, 95% CI 0.33-1.08), or all-cause hospitalization (aRR 0.82, 95% CI 0.65-1.05) at 30 days, but did have an increase in outpatient diuretic dose adjustments (aRR 1.84, 95% CI 1.44-2.36). All associations were similar at 90 and 365 days postdischarge. CONCLUSIONS: A postdischarge HF telemonitoring intervention was associated with more diuretic dose adjustments but was not significantly associated with HF-related morbidity and mortality.

Echocardiographic Predictors of Hemodynamics in Patients Supported With Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

BACKGROUND: The assessment of hemodynamics in patients supported with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) is often challenging. Physical examination maneuvers correlate poorly with true hemodynamics. We assessed the value of novel transthoracic echocardiography (TTE)-derived variables to reliably predict hemodynamics in patients supported with LVAD. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 102 Doppler-TTE images of the LVAD outflow cannula were obtained during simultaneous invasive right heart catheterization (RHC) in 30 patients supported with continuous-flow LVADs (22 HMII, 8 HVAD) either during routine RHC or during invasive ramp testing. Properties of the Doppler signal though the outflow cannula were measured at each ramp stage (RS), including the systolic slope (SS), diastolic slope (DS), and velocity time integral (VTI). Hemodynamic variables were concurrently recorded, including Doppler opening pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), right atrial pressure, pulmonary artery pressure, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), Fick cardiac output (CO) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR). Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to explore the dependence of PCWP, CO, and SVR on DS, SS, VTI, MAP, HR, and RS. Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed significant contributions of DS on PCWP (PCWPpred = 0.164DS + 4.959; R = 0.68). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis revealed that PCWPpred could predict an elevated PCWP ≥18 mm Hg with a sensitivity (Sn) of 94% and specificity (Sp) of 85% (area under the ROC curve 0.88). CO could be predicted by RS, VTI, and HR (COpred = 0.017VTI + 0.016HR + 0.12RS + 2.042; R = 0.61). COpred could predict CO ≤4.5 L/min with Sn 73% and Sp 79% (AUC 0.81). SVR could be predicted by MAP, VTI, and HR (SVRpred = 15.44MAP - 5.453VTI - 6.349HR + 856.15; R = 0.84) with Sn 84% and Sp 79% (AUC 0.91) to predict SVR ≥1200 dyn-s/cm5. CONCLUSIONS: Doppler-TTE variables derived from the LVAD outflow cannula can reliably predict PCWP, CO, and SVR in patients supported with LVADs and may mitigate the need for invasive testing.

Cannula and Pump Positions Are Associated With Left Ventricular Unloading and Clinical Outcome in Patients With HeartWare Left Ventricular Assist Device.

BACKGROUND: Cannula and pump positions are associated with clinical outcomes such as device thrombosis in patients with HeartMate II; however, clinical implications of HVAD (HeartWare International, Framingham, Massachusetts) cannula position are unknown. This study aims to assess the relationship among cannula position, left ventricular (LV) unloading, and patient prognosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-seven HVAD patients (60.0 ± 12.6 years of age and 19 males [70%]) underwent ramp test. Device position was quantified from chest X-ray parameters obtained at the time of the hemodyamic ramp test: (1) cannula coronal angle, (2) pump depth, (3) cannula sagittal angle, and (4) pump area. Lower cannula coronal angle was associated with LV unloading (as measured by smaller LV diastolic dimension and lower pulmonary capillary wedge pressure). Smaller pump area was associated with LV dynamic unloading, as assessed by steeper negative slopes of LV diastolic dimension and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure during incremental rotational speed change. Cannula coronal angle ≤65° was associated with reduced heart failure readmission rate (hazard ratio, 10.33; P = .007 by log-rank test). CONCLUSION: HVAD cannula and pump positions are associated with LV unloading and improved clinical outcomes. Prospective studies evaluating surgical techniques to ensure optimal device positioning and its effects on clinical outcomes are warranted.

Residual native left ventricular function optimization using quantitative 3D echocardiographic assessment of rotational mechanics in patients with left ventricular assist devices.

Preservation of native left ventricular (LV) function in patients supported with LV assist device (LVAD) may be beneficial to attain optimal hemodynamics and enhance potential recovery. Currently, LVAD speed optimization is based on hemodynamic parameters, without considering residual native LV function. We hypothesized that alternatively, LV rotational mechanics can be quantified by 3D echocardiography (3DE), and may help preserve native LV function while optimizing LVAD speed. The goal of this study was to test the feasibility of quantifying the effects of LVAD implantation on LV rotational mechanics and to determine whether conventional speed optimization maximally preserves native LV function. We studied 55 patients with LVADs, who underwent 3DE imaging and quantitative analysis of LV twist. Thirty patients were studied before and after LVAD implantation. The remaining 25 patients were studied during hemodynamic ramp studies. The pump speed at which LV twist was maximal was compared with the hemodynamics-based optimal speed. LV twist decreased following LVAD implantation from 4.2 ± 2.7 to 2.3 ± 1.9° (P < 0.01), reflecting the constricting effects on native function. With lower pump speeds, no significant changes were noted in LV twist, which peaked at a higher speed. In 11/25 (44%) patients, the conventional hemodynamic/2DE methodology and 3DE assessment of maximal residual function did not indicate the same optimal conditions, suggesting that a higher pump speed would have better preserved native function. In conclusion, quantitative 3DE analysis of LV rotational mechanics provides information, which together with hemodynamics may help select optimal pump speed, while maximally preserving native LV function.

The Hemodynamic Effects of Aortic Insufficiency in Patients Supported With Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

BACKGROUND: The impact of aortic insufficiency (AI) on the morbidity and mortality of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients remains controversial. This study's aim was to assess the hemodynamics of LVAD patients with at least mild AI, at baseline and in response to device speed changes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Asymptomatic LVAD patients were prospectively enrolled and underwent a hemodynamic and echocardiographic ramp study. Hemodynamics at rest and in response to device speed changes were compared between patients with at least mild AI at their baseline speed and patients without AI. Fift-five patients were enrolled in the study, and 42% had AI. The AI group had higher baseline central venous pressure (11 ± 5 vs 8 ± 5 mm Hg; P = .03), higher pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) (16 ± 6 vs 12 ± 6 mm Hg; P = .02) and lower pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPI) (2.3 ± 1.3 vs 3.6 ± 2.4; P = .01). Cardiac index (CI) increased and PCWP decreased in both groups by similar degrees during the ramp study. AI worsened in 78% of patients during the ramp study. CONCLUSIONS: LVAD patients with at least mild AI have increased filling pressures and reduced PAPI. Normalization of filling pressures can be achieved by increasing LVAD speed; however, this concomitantly worsens AI severity. The long-term hemodynamic consequences of this approach are unknown.

Screening for Outflow Cannula Malfunction of Left Ventricular Assist Devices (LVADs) With the Use of Doppler Echocardiography: New LVAD-Specific Reference Values for Contemporary Devices.

BACKGROUND: Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) is used as a screening tool to evaluate the integrity and mechanics of the pump and circuit. We aimed to 1) establish the normal range and upper reference limit of peak velocity of the outflow cannula for the modern era of LVADs and 2) assess the clinical performance of the currently cited and newly proposed reference limits in patients with continuous-flow LVADs as a screening tool for cannula malfunction. METHODS: LVAD outflow peak CW velocities were measured with the use of Doppler transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in 57 patients with LVADs (44 with Heartmate II (HM2), 13 with Heartware (HW)). The average velocity and the upper and lower normal reference limits (defined as ±2 standard deviations from the mean) for each LVAD type was calculated. The upper reference limit was then used as a screening threshold for cannula malfunction. RESULTS: The average outflow cannula peak velocity for the normal HM2 cohort was 1.86 ± 0.44 m/s with upper and lower reference limits of 2.73 m/s and 0.98 m/s, respectively. The average outflow cannula peak velocity for the normal HW cohort was 2.36 ± 0.53 m/s with upper and lower reference limits of 3.42 m/s and 1.3 m/s, respectively, which was significantly higher than the HM2 cohort (P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: In both HM2 and HW LVADs, the average peak outflow velocity and reference limit for the normal population, as measured by Doppler TTE, was markedly higher than the currently used LVAD reference limits of 2 m/s and are significantly different between devices. Patients with peak outflow velocities above our upper reference limits should be evaluated for LVAD outflow cannula malfunction.

The future of mechanical circulatory support for advanced heart failure.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) has become the main focus of heart replacement therapy for end stage heart failure patients. Advances in technology are moving towards miniaturization, biventricular support devices, complete internalization, improved hemocompatibility profiles, and responsiveness to cardiac loading conditions. This review will discuss the recent advances and investigational devices in MCS for advanced heart failure. RECENT FINDINGS: The demand for both short-term and long-term durable devices for advanced heart failure is increasing. The current devices are still fraught with an unacceptably high incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding and thromboembolic and infectious complications. New devices are on the horizon focusing on miniaturization, versatility for biventricular support, improved hemocompatibility, use of alternate energy sources, and incorporation of continuous hemodynamic monitoring. SUMMARY: The role for MCS in advanced heart replacement therapy is steadily increasing. With the advent of newer generation devices on the horizon, the potential exists for MCS to surpass heart transplantation as the primary therapy for advanced heart failure.

New Challenges in the Treatment of Patients With Left Ventricular Support: LVAD Thrombosis.

Mechanical circulatory support has revolutionized the treatment of heart failure, affording patients significantly improved survival and quality of life. However, further advancements in this technology have been hindered by adverse events, particularly gastrointestinal bleeding, driveline infection, stroke, and device thrombosis. Recently, there has been a renewed focus on device thrombosis as the reported incidence has increased. This review focuses on an update on the diagnostic modalities and current treatment algorithms of this serious complication.

Left Ventricular Decompression During Speed Optimization Ramps in Patients Supported by Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices: Device-Specific Performance Characteristics and Impact on Diagnostic Algorithms.

BACKGROUND: Echocardiographic ramp tests have been widely used to help guide speed adjustments and for identification of potential device malfunctions in patients with axial continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) (Heartmate II LVAD [HMII]). Recently, the use of centrifugal-flow LVADs (Heartware LVAD [HVAD]) has been on the rise. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of ramp tests for assessing ventricular decompression in HVAD patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this prospective study, ramp tests were performed before index hospitalization discharge or at the time of device malfunction. Vital signs, device parameters (including flow), and echocardiographic parameters (including left ventricular end-diastolic dimension [LVEDD], frequency of aortic valve [AV] opening, and valvular insufficiency) were recorded in increments of 100 rpm, from 2,300 rpm to 3,200 rpm. Twenty-six ramp tests were performed, 19 for speed optimization and 7 for device malfunction assessment. The average speed after the speed optimization ramp tests was 2,534.74 ± 156.32 RPM, and the AV closed at a mean speed of 2,751.77 ± 227.16 rpm, with 1 patient's valve remaining open at the maximum speed. The reduction in LVEDD for each speed increase was significantly different when the AV was open or closed, at -0.09 cm/increment and -0.15 cm/increment, respectively (P = .013), which is significantly different than previously established HMII LVEDD slopes. There were also significant changes in overall device flow (P = .001), upper flow (P = .031), and lower flow (P = .003) after AV closure. The power slope did not change significantly after the AV closed (P = .656). Five of the 19 tests were stopped before completion owing to suction events, but all tests reached ≥3,000 rpm. CONCLUSIONS: The parameter slopes for the HMII cannot be directly applied to ramp studies in HVAD patients. Overall, the LVEDD slope is drastically smaller in magnitude than the previously reported HMII findings, and speed adjustments were not based on the degree of left ventricular unloading. Therefore, the slope of the LVEDD-rpm relationship is not likely to be helpful in evaluating HVAD function.

HAS-BLED and CHA2DS2-VASc scores as predictors of bleeding and thrombotic risk after continuous-flow ventricular assist device implantation.

BACKGROUND: HAS-BLED and CHA2DS2-VASc scores predict bleeding in patients on anticoagulation and thromboembolic (TE) risk in patients with atrial fibrillation, respectively. We hypothesized that these scores would be predictive of bleeding and TE complications following continuous-flow ventricular assist device (CF-VAD) implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Baseline HAS-BLED and CHA2DS2-VASc scores were retrospectively determined for 173 consecutive patients who underwent HeartMate II CF-VAD implantation at a single center from 2005 to 2011. Forty-three patients had bleeding (24.9%) and 22 had TE (12.7%) events over a 290 patient-year follow-up period. The mean ± SD HAS-BLED scores were 2.7 ± 1.0 and 1.9 ± 1.1 (P < .0001) in patients with and without bleeding, respectively. The CHA2DS2-VASc scores were 3.6 ± 1.4 and 2.9 ± 1.5 (P = .03) in patients with and without TE events, respectively. A HAS-BLED score of ≥ 3 was associated with a significantly higher risk of bleeding events compared with a score of <3 (42% vs 15%, respectively; hazard ratio [HR] 3.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.82-6.32; P < .001). A CHA2DS2-VASc score of ≥ 3 was associated with a higher risk of TE events compared with a score of <3 (18% vs 4%, respectively; HR 4.02, 95% CI 1.19-13.6; P = .025). CONCLUSIONS: Baseline HAS-BLED and CHA2DS2-VASc scores of ≥ 3 conferred significantly higher risks of bleeding and TE, respectively, following HeartMate II implantation.

Survival in elderly patients supported with continuous flow left ventricular assist device as bridge to transplantation or destination therapy.

BACKGROUND: Published data on mechanical circulatory support for elderly patients in continuous flow devices are sparse and suggest relatively poor survival. This study investigated whether LVADs can be implanted in selected patients over the age of 65 years with acceptable survival compared with published outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: A single-center retrospective analysis was conducted in 64 consecutive patients ≥65 years of age implanted with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) as either bridge to transplantation or destination therapy from August 2005 to January 2012. Baseline laboratory and hemodynamic characteristics and follow-up data were obtained. Median survival was 1,090 days. Survival was 85%, 74%, 55%, and 45% at 6 months and 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. Our cohort had a baseline mean Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM) score of 2.6 ± 0.9. Observed survival was significantly better than SHFM-predicted medical survival. Stratification by age subsets, renal function, SHFM, implantation intention, or etiology did not reveal significant differences in survival. The most common cause of death was sepsis and nonlethalcomplication was bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience with patients over the age of 65 receiving CF-LVADs suggests that this group demonstrates excellent survival. Further research is needed to discern the specific criteria for risk stratification for LVAD support in the elderly.

Developing Clinical Risk Prediction Models for Worsening Heart Failure Events and Death by Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.

Background There is a need to develop electronic health record-based predictive models for worsening heart failure (WHF) events across clinical settings and across the spectrum of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Methods and Results We studied adults with heart failure (HF) from 2011 to 2019 within an integrated health care delivery system. WHF encounters were ascertained using natural language processing and structured data. We conducted boosted decision tree ensemble models to predict 1-year hospitalizations, emergency department visits/observation stays, and outpatient encounters for WHF and all-cause death within each LVEF category: HF with reduced ejection fraction (EF) (LVEF <40%), HF with mildly reduced EF (LVEF 40%-49%), and HF with preserved EF (LVEF ≥50%). Model discrimination was evaluated using area under the curve and calibration using mean squared error. We identified 338 426 adults with HF: 61 045 (18.0%) had HF with reduced EF, 49 618 (14.7%) had HF with mildly reduced EF, and 227 763 (67.3%) had HF with preserved EF. The 1-year risks of any WHF event and death were, respectively, 22.3% and 13.0% for HF with reduced EF, 17.0% and 10.1% for HF with mildly reduced EF, and 16.3% and 10.3% for HF with preserved EF. The WHF model displayed an area under the curve of 0.76 and mean squared error of 0.13, whereas the model for death displayed an area under the curve of 0.83 and mean squared error of 0.076. Performance and predictors were similar across WHF encounter types and LVEF categories. Conclusions We developed risk prediction models for 1-year WHF events and death across the LVEF spectrum using structured and unstructured electronic health record data and observed no substantial differences in model performance or predictors except for death, despite differences in underlying HF cause.

Increased Rate of Pump Thrombosis and Cardioembolic Events Following Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Patients Supported With Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

Ventricular arrhythmias are common following left ventricular assist device implantation (LVAD), and the effects of ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation on thrombosis and embolic events are unknown. We aimed to assess LVAD thrombosis, stroke, and embolic event rates after VT ablation. Left ventricular assist device implantation patients from two academic centers who underwent endocardial VT ablation between 2009 and 2016 were compared to a control group with VT who were not ablated and followed for one year. The primary composite outcome was confirmed or suspected LVAD thrombosis, stroke, or other embolic event. Survival analysis was conducted with Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests, and Cox regression. Forty-three LVAD patients underwent VT ablation, and 73 LVAD patients had VT but were not ablated. Patients who were ablated were more likely have VT prior to LVAD (p = 0.04), monomorphic VT (p < 0.01), and to be on antiarrhythmics (p < 0.01). Fifty-eight percent of the patients in the ablation group experienced the primary composite outcome (11% had confirmed device thrombosis [DT], 41% suspected DT, 39% had a stroke or embolic event) compared to 30% in the control group (12% with confirmed DT, 11% with suspected DT, 14% with stroke or embolic event) (p = 0.002). In multivariable regression, ablation was an independent predictor of the primary composite outcome (hazard ratios, 2.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-4.61; p = 0.03). Patients with LVADs referred for endocardial VT ablation had elevated rates of DT and embolic events.

The Effects of Hemodynamic Unloading in African Americans Implanted with Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

We aim to evaluate the echocardiographic/hemodynamic effects of left ventricular assist devices in African American (AA) versus non-AA patients undergoing ramp speed optimization and its subsequent effect on readmissions. In 65 patients (26 AA), no differences in baseline echocardiographic/hemodynamic parameters were noted. During ramp testing, there was a significantly greater increase in cardiac output (slope: 0.29 ± 0.24 vs. 0.15 ± 0.12, p < 0.01) with more rapid decrease in left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (slope: -0.21 ± 0.14 vs. -0.13 ± 0.07 L/min, p < 0.01) in the AA group. AAs had higher all-cause, but similar heart failure readmission rate as compared with the non-AA group.

Impact of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy on Left Ventricular Unloading in Patients with Implanted Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are common heart failure therapies; however, little is known regarding the concomitant use of these devices. We aim to evaluate unloading differences in LVAD patients with and without active biventricular pacing. Left ventricular assist device patients with and without CRT prospectively underwent ramp hemodynamic/echocardiographic testing. Patients with >95% biventricular pacing comprised the active CRT pacing group; all others (no device, implantable cardioverter defibrillator only, CRT without biventricular pacing) were categorized into the non-CRT pacing group. Invasive hemodynamics and echocardiographic characteristics (left ventricular end-diastolic/systolic diameter and valvular regurgitation) were measured at baseline and at incremental speed changes. Unloading slopes were calculated using linear regression modeling for individual hemodynamics and echocardiographic characteristics across speeds. Among 62 LVAD patients (age 59.6 ± 11.4 years, 60% male), 25 had active CRT pacing. There was no significant difference in echocardiographic or hemodynamic characteristics at baseline or final set speeds between CRT groups. Similarly, no significant differences were noted in the unloading characteristics. In LVAD patients, active biventricular pacing is unlikely to improve echocardiographic or hemodynamic characteristics.

Outflow Cannula Systolic Slope in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices: A Novel Marker of Myocardial Contractility.

Left ventricular (LV) unloading with a LV assist device (LVAD) reverse remodels the heart and may lead to favorable changes in cellular architecture and LV geometry promoting myocardial recovery. Currently, there are no standardized methods for evaluating myocardial recovery. This study assesses the systolic slope of the LVAD outflow cannula as a marker for myocardial contractility. Doppler echocardiography (transthoracic echocardiogram [TTE]) of the LVAD outflow cannula and TTE of the LV cavity were prospectively collected in 57 patients with LVADs. Systolic acceleration of the LVAD outflow cannula was measured in each patient as the peak change of velocity over time (dv/dt) during systole from continuous-wave Doppler signal acquired from the LVAD outflow cannula. Ventricular volumes were concurrently measured by TTE. In a subset of 10 patients, the systolic slope was measured during each stage of a ramp study to study the properties of this parameter across a variety of loading conditions. The systolic slope of the LVAD outflow cannula was successfully measured in 53 of 57 patients (93%). Systolic slope strongly correlated with ejection fraction (EF) (R = 0.92). Analysis of systolic slope stratified by EF (EF >30%, EF 20-30%, EF 10-20%, and EF <10%) revealed systolic slopes that were significantly different between the groups (1,371 cm/s ± 324; 983 cm/s ± 122; 578 cm/s ± 139; and 495 cm/s ± 107, respectively; p < 0.001). Systolic slope did not change significantly across variable preload and afterload conditions during a ramp study. Systolic slope of the LVAD outflow cannula strongly correlates with EF and can be used to assess underlying myocardial contractility across a variety of LVAD loading conditions.

Home Inotropes in Patients Supported with Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

There is little data outlining the use of outpatient inotropic medications in patients with existing left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). This case series explores this patient population and seeks to define the indications, complications, and safety of dual support. A retrospective chart review was conducted for all patients on LVAD and then subsequently started on home inotropes post device implant. Eight patients met inclusion criteria. The indications for inotropes were right ventricular failure, aortic insufficiency with biventricular failure, LVAD thrombosis with contraindication to device exchange, and cannula malposition with elevated pulmonary vascular resistance. Mean duration of combined support was 273 ± 170 days. Cardiac index improved from 1.96 ± 0.24 to 2.31 ± 0.35 L/min/m(2) after inotropes (p = 0.02). There was no change in hospital admissions. The most common reason for readmission was heart failure symptoms, followed by bleeding. Five patients died during the study period, one underwent heart transplant, and two remain on inotropic support. Home inotropes may be indicated in selected continuous flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) patients with refractory right ventricular failure or impaired LVAD function. Inotropes can improve hemodynamics and provide palliation of symptoms. However, long-term inotrope use does not reduce hospital readmissions and is associated with multiple complications related to the need for an indwelling intravenous line.

Association of Inflow Cannula Position with Left Ventricular Unloading and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist Device.

The relationship between the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device (LVAD) position and pump thrombosis has been reported. However, further clinical implications of device position are unknown. This study aimed to investigate optimal device position for better left ventricular (LV) unloading and patient prognosis. Patients undergoing a ramp test with right heart catheterization after HeartMate II LVAD implantation were enrolled to this study. Device position was quantified from the chest X-ray obtained at the time of the ramp test: (1) inflow cannula angle relative to horizontal line, (2) pump angle relative to spine, (3) pump depth, (4) angle between inflow cannula and pump, and (5) angle between pump and outflow graft. LV unloading was assessed by pulmonary capillary wedge pressure at set LVAD speed. Fifty-four patients (60 years old and 34 male [63%]) were enrolled. Nobody experienced device malfunction during the study period. Increased LV unloading (i.e., lower pulmonary capillary wedge pressure) was associated with a narrower inflow cannula angle relative to horizontal line. Inflow cannula angle <75° was associated with higher 1 year heart failure readmission-free survival rate (p < 0.05, hazards ratio 7.56 [95% confidence interval 2.32-24.7]). In conclusion, HeartMate II LVAD inflow cannula position was associated with LV unloading and patient prognosis. Prospective studies to ensure optimal device positioning and target better clinical outcomes are warranted.