Understanding Public Perceptions of Nipple and Scar Characteristics After Chest Wall Masculinization Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Surgical chest masculinization procedures, especially gender-affirming top surgery (GATS), are becoming increasingly prevalent in the USA. While a variety of surgical techniques have been established as both safe and effective, there is limited research examining ideal aesthetic nipple appearance and incision scar pattern. This study employs patient images to understand the public's perception on top surgery outcomes when adjusting for BMI ranges and Fitzpatrick skin types. METHODS: Images from RealSelf modified via Adobe Photoshop depicted various scar types and nipple-areolar complex (NAC) sizes/positions. A Qualtrics survey was distributed utilizing Amazon Mechanical Turk. Statistical analysis was performed through JMP Pro 17 for ordinal and categorical values, with a p value less than or equal to 0.05 statistically significant. RESULTS: A moderately sized and laterally placed NAC was preferred. A transverse scar that resembles the pectoral border between the level of the inframammary fold and pectoral insertion was deemed most masculine and aesthetic. Majority of results demonstrated that this is unaffected by Fitzpatrick skin types. Increased BMI images impacted public preferences, as a nipple placed farther from the transverse incision (p = 0.04) and a transverse scar position closer to the IMF was preferred in higher BMI patients. CONCLUSIONS: An understanding of the most popular NAC and scar choices, as well as how these factors may differ when considering a Fitzpatrick skin type or BMI categorization was attained. This validates the importance of patient-centered approach when employing surgical techniques in GATS. Future studies intend to obtain reports from actual patients considering GATS. NO LEVEL ASSIGNED: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable.

Optimizing Surgical Outcomes and the Role of Preventive Surgery: A Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: Plastic and reconstructive surgeons are often presented with reconstructive challenges as a sequela of complications in high-risk surgical patients, ranging from exposure of hardware, lymphedema, and chronic pain after amputation. These complications can result in significant morbidity, recovery time, resource utilization, and cost. Given the prevalence of surgical complications managed by plastic and reconstructive surgeons, developing novel preventative techniques to mitigate surgical risk is paramount. METHODS: Herein, we aim to understand efforts supporting the nascent field of Preventive Surgery, including (1) enhanced risk stratification, (2) advancements in postoperative care. Through an emphasis on four surgical cohorts who may benefit from preventive surgery, two of which are at high risk of morbidity from wound-related complications (patients undergoing sternotomy and spine procedures) and two at high risk of other morbidities, including lymphedema and neuropathic pain, we aim to provide a comprehensive and improved understanding of preventive surgery. Additionally, the role of risk analysis for these procedures and the relationship between microsurgery and prophylaxis is emphasized. RESULTS: (1) medical optimization and prehabilitation, (2) surgical mitigation techniques. CONCLUSION: Reconstructive surgeons are ideally placed to lead efforts in the creation and validation of accurate risk assessment tools and to support algorithmic approaches to surgical risk mitigation. Through a paradigm shift, including universal promotion of the concept of "Preventive Surgery," major improvements in surgical outcomes may be achieved.

Impact of sternal notch-to-nipple distance and resection weight asymmetry on complication rates and patient reported outcomes in reduction mammaplasty.

While there are numerous predictive models for estimating resection weight, their accuracy may not be strong. Through institutional data of patients who received reduction mammaplasty, this study demonstrates that preoperative sternal notch-to-nipple distance is not an optimal predictive factor for differences in final resection weight, complication rates, and patient reported outcomes. Our results showed that there is a weak correlation between preoperative sternal notch to nipple asymmetry and final resection weight asymmetry. Additionally, significant breast asymmetry is not tied to an increase in complication rates or poorer patient reported outcomes. There is an indication to reconsider the use of such absolute measures for determining who may benefit from reduction mammaplasty.

Complications after gender-affirming chest masculinization surgery do not impact patient satisfaction.

Chest masculinization surgery is an increasingly common procedure and has offered significant benefits to the gender-diverse community. Although major complications are an infrequent occurrence in chest masculinization surgery, they may still impact surgical success. While the long-term success of chest masculinization surgery has been examined through patient-reported outcome measures, there is no study that has assessed the association between complications and patient-reported outcomes. In this study, patients who underwent double incision or periareolar mastectomies for chest masculinization by a single surgeon were surveyed. Demographic, operative, and postoperative variables were obtained from medical records. The BODY-Q and SCAR-Q modules (Q-Portfolio.org) were used to assess postoperative patient-reported outcomes. There were 151 survey responders (43% response rate), 132 without complications and 19 with complications. No significant differences in patient-reported outcomes were noted when comparing the groups with and without complications. While some providers may be reluctant to offer chest masculinization to patients they deem high risk for complications, patients and providers should be assured that complications do not significantly impact patient satisfaction. LAY SUMMARY: Gender-affirming chest masculinization surgery is increasingly common. We investigated the impact of complications on patient-reported outcomes in chest masculinization. Patients and providers should be assured that complications do not significantly impact patient satisfaction.

Sternal bone anatomy on preoperative imaging as an independent predictor of deep sternal dehiscence following median sternotomy.

Complications following median sternotomy are associated with morbidity, mortality, and major healthcare costs. With plastic surgeons being increasingly consulted to close complex sternotomy wounds, a more accurate risk stratification tool for this comorbid patient population is warranted. This study examines the association of preoperative radiologic sternal measurements and deep sternal dehiscence, comparing this with other known clinical risk factors. A decreased manubrium sternal thickness relative to body weight (<0.13 mm/kg) and an absolute inferior sternal width ≤13.8 mm had a significant association with the development of deep sternal dehiscence, even with adjustment for known clinical risk factors. With such measurements assisting in further risk stratification, the opportunity to improve risk assessment holds value for plastic and reconstructive surgeons who are consulted to close extensive sternotomy wounds.

Effect of pedicle type on breast reduction: Clinical and patient-reported outcomes.

PURPOSE: The choice of pedicle in reduction mammaplasty is highly variable with prior studies demonstrating high patient satisfaction in most cases. This study aimed to examine the impact of pedicle type on clinical and patient-reported outcomes in patients undergoing reduction mammaplasty. METHODS: A total of 588 patients underwent bilateral reduction mammaplasty with Wise pattern or modified Robertson incision by 13 surgeons at a single institution. Clinical outcomes were compared according to the pedicle type in all patients and BREAST-Q responders (32% response rate). Survey respondents were sub-grouped by resection volume, and the BREAST-Q satisfaction scores were compared. RESULTS: Among all included reduction mammoplasties, 439 (75%) were performed using inferior pedicles, and 149 (25%) using superior or superomedial pedicles. Responders and non-responders were similar in preoperative characteristics including age, body measurements, and comorbidities. Although a higher incidence of infection occurred among the responders, clinical outcomes were comparable across all pedicle types. A total of 187 patients completed the BREAST-Q. Compared to the superior pedicle group, respondents in the inferior pedicle group reported higher nipple satisfaction, even when adjusted for resection weight over 500 g. In contrast, the superior pedicle group had better sexual well-being scores, which persisted in resection weight less than 500 g (all p values <0.05). CONCLUSION: Inferior pedicles were associated with greater nipple satisfaction and superior pedicles were associated with greater sexual satisfaction. Our findings suggest that those with resections less than 500 g were more satisfied with superior pedicles whereas those with greater resections were more satisfied with inferior pedicles.