Suture closure AFtEr large bore vein access (SAFE-VEIN): A randomized, prospective study of the efficacy and safety of venous closure device.

BACKGROUND: Perclose ProGlide (PPG) Suture-Mediated Closure System™ is safe and can reduce time to hemostasis following procedures requiring arterial access. AIMS: We aimed to compare PPG to figure of 8 suture in patients who underwent interventional catheter procedures requiring large bore venous access (LBVA) (≥13 French). METHODS: In this physician-initiated, randomized, single-center study [clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT04632641], single-stick venous access was obtained under ultrasound guidance. Eligible patients were randomized 1:1, and 100 subjects received allocated treatment to either PPG (n = 47) or figure of 8 suture (n = 53). No femoral arterial access was used in any patient. Primary outcomes were time to achieve hemostasis (TTH) and time to ambulation (TTA). Secondary outcomes were time to discharge (TTD) and vascular-related complications and mortality. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare TTH, TTA, and TTD. RESULTS: TTH (minutes) was significantly lower in PPG versus figure of 8 suture [median, (Q1, Q3)] [7 (2,10) vs. 11 (10,15) respectively, p < 0.001]. TTA (minutes) was significantly lower in PPG compared to figure of 8 suture [322 (246,452) vs. 403 (353, 633) respectively, p = 0.005]. TTD (minutes) was not significantly different between the PPG and figure of 8 suture arms [1257 (1081, 1544) vs. 1338 (1171,1435), p = 0.650]. There was no difference in minor bleeding or access site hematomas between both arms. No other vascular complications or mortality were reported. CONCLUSION: PPG use had lower TTH and TTA than figure of 8 suture in a population of patients receiving LBVA procedures. This may encourage same-day discharge in these patients.

Differences and Disparities Among Self-Referred and Physician-Referred Populations Undergoing Coronary Artery Calcium Scanning.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery calcium computed tomography (CAC) is an important tool for identifying subclinical atherosclerosis and cardiovascular risk stratification. Despite robust evidence and inclusion in current guidelines, CAC is considered investigational by some US insurance carriers and requires out-of-pocket expenses. CAC can be obtained via self-referral (SR) or physician referral (PR). We aimed to examine differences in patient, socioeconomic, and CAC characteristics between referral groups. METHODS: We evaluated demographic, medical history, and CAC results of consecutive patients with a CAC completed at one of multiple Wisconsin sites from March 1, 2019, to June 30, 2021. We separated patients into SR and PR groups. Through census data, we analyzed socioeconomic variables at the block level including race and ethnicity, median income, average household size, and high school completion in the areas where patients resided at the time of CAC. RESULTS: The final analysis included 19 726 patients: 13 835 (70.1%) PR and 5891 (29.9%) SR. Most patients in both groups were White (95.2% versus 95.1%), with the Black/African American population representing 2.7% (SR) and 2.3% (PR). The PR group had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors. SR patients were more likely to have a score of 0 (41.2% versus 38.1%; P<0.001); PR patients had a higher prevalence of CAC >300 (16.8% versus 14.8%; P<0.001). SR patients were more likely to be women (55.1% versus 48.9%; P<0.001) and were found to live in higher income areas (19.5% versus 16.4%; P<0.001). Patients from low-income areas comprised the smallest proportion in both groups (7.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who obtain out-of-pocket CAC live predominantly in medium- and high-income areas, and patients from lower income locations are less likely to obtain CAC despite having more cardiovascular disease risk factors. Consideration should be made from a policy perspective to promote health equity and improve utilization of CAC testing among underrepresented groups.

Perinatal and neonatal outcomes for fetoscopic laser ablation for the treatment of twin twin transfusion syndrome at a single center.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the perinatal and neonatal outcomes of fetal laser ablation (FLA) for the treatment of twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) in our single center institution. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study of 76 treated pregnant women. Procedural complications, perinatal and neonatal outcomes analyzed. Differences in outcomes between two procedural techniques, selective and Solomon, compared. RESULTS: FLA occurred at median gestational age (GA) of 20.8 weeks (IQR 18.1-22.9) with low incidence of procedural complications (5.3%). High survival rate with delivery of at least one neonate (96%) [95% CI: 88.9-99.2%]; 73.7% [95% CI: 62.3-83.1%] were twins. Median GA at birth was 33.1 weeks (IQR 28.0-35.0). Neonatal mortality and morbidities were 9.4% and 48.3% of cases respectively, and associated with lower GA. Solomon cases had comparatively higher median GA, and lower incidences of neonatal morbidities. CONCLUSION: Our small single center study showed favorable outcomes for using the Solomon technique in the treatment of TTTS.

Myocardial Work in Apical Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Pressure-strain loop analysis is a novel echocardiographic technique to calculate myocardial work indices that has not been applied to patients with apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (ApHCM). We hypothesized that myocardial work indices differ between patients with ApHCM and those with non-ApHCM. This study aimed to (1) evaluate myocardial work indices in patients with ApHCM compared with those with non-ApHCM, (2) describe associations with relevant clinical variables, and (3) examine associations with significant late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 48 patients with ApHCM and 69 with non-ApHCM who had measurements of global longitudinal strain (GLS), global work index (GWI), global constructive work (GCW), global wasted work, and global work efficiency. We evaluated available cardiac magnetic resonance imaging data on 34 patients with ApHCM and 51 with non-ApHCM. Multivariable regression models correcting for traditional cardiac risk factors were used to evaluate the associations of myocardial work indices with relevant clinical variables. RESULTS: Median GLS (-11% vs -18%, P < .001), GWI (966 mm Hg% vs 1803 mm Hg%, P < .001), and GCW (1,050 mm Hg% vs 1,988 mm Hg%, P < .001) were significantly impaired in patients with ApHCM compared with those with non-ApHCM. Increasing N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide, abnormal ultrasensitive troponin, and increasing maximal left ventricular wall thickness were significantly associated with reduced GWI and GCW in patients with ApHCM (P < .05). Global constructive work had only modest accuracy (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.70) to predict LGE in patients with ApHCM. However, in patients with non-ApHCM, GLS was the strongest predictor of LGE (AUC = 0.91), with a -17% cutoff yielding 81% sensitivity and 80% specificity. CONCLUSION: Myocardial work indices are significantly impaired in patients with ApHCM compared to those with non-ApHCM and correlate with important clinical variables. Global longitudinal strain, GWI, and GCW are more strongly predictive of fibrosis in patients with non-ApHCM than ApHCM.

Virtual Behavioral Health Treatment Satisfaction and Outcomes Across Time.

Purpose: The COVID-19 pandemic continues to have major and long-lasting impacts on health care delivery and mental health. As health care shifted to telehealth, legislation was adjusted to expand telehealth allowances, creating a unique opportunity to elucidate outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess long-term patient and clinician satisfaction and outcomes with virtual behavioral health. Methods: Data were obtained over 16 months from surveys to patients and clinicians receiving/providing virtual treatment. Outcomes data also were collected from medical records of adults receiving in-person and virtual behavioral health treatment. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics. Groups were compared using various chi-squared tests for categorical variables, Likert response trends over time, and conditional independence, with Wilcoxon rank-sum or Jonckheere trend test used to assess continuous variables. P-values of ≤0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: Patients gave high ratings to virtual treatment and indicated a preference for virtual formats. Both patient and clinician preference for virtual visits increased significantly with time, and many clinicians perceived virtual services to be equally effective to in-person. Virtual programs had higher completion rates, attendance rates, and number of treatment visits, suggesting that virtual behavioral health had equivalent or better outcomes to in-person treatment and that attitudes toward telehealth changed over time. Conclusions: If trends found in this study continue, telehealth may emerge as a preferred option long term This is important considering the increase in mental health needs associated with the COVID-19 pandemic and the eventuality that in-person restrictions ease as the pandemic subsides.