Predictors and timeline of spontaneous conversion to normal sinus rhythm: A single center retrospective cohort study of patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation.

INTRODUCTION: Annual healthcare expenditures associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) in the United States (US) continue to grow as more symptomatic patients present to emergency departments (ED). Predictors of spontaneous conversion to normal sinus rhythm (ScNSR) remain poorly understood, as well as the timeline of ScNSR remains unclear. We sought to 1) to assess the association of key demographics, anthropometric, and clinical factors to ScNSR and 2) to evaluate the timeline of ScNSR, and 3) determine clinical predictors of ScNSR. METHODS: This single center, retrospective cohort study analyzed patients aged ≥18 years with symptomatic AF as diagnosed and evaluated through the ED of a rural tertiary care center in West Virginia from September 2015 to December 2018. RESULTS: Our cohort consisted of 375 AF patients (mean age 65 years, 54% male). A total of 177 patients attained ScNSR either in the ED or after hospital admission with a mean conversion time of 14.7 h (±12). Onset of symptoms <24 hrs has strong positive association to ScNSR 3.97 (95% CI: 2.24-7.05; p < 0.0001). Male gender 0.55 (95% CI: 0.35-0.85; p = 0.007) and hypertension 0.48 (95% CI: 0.31-0.76; p = 0.002), showed a strong negative association to ScNSR. Of the patients that converted spontaneously (177), the majority, 136 (76.8%) achieved ScNSR within 24 h of ED triage without use of electrical or chemical cardioversion. CONCLUSION: Most patients with AF in the ED converted spontaneously to sinus rhythm within the first 24 h which underscores the importance of earlier watchful waiting over interventions to achieve normal sinus rhythm (NSR).

Documentation of shared decision making around primary prevention defibrillator implantations.

INTRODUCTION: Patients eligible for primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy are faced with a complex decision that needs a clear understanding of the risks and benefits of such an intervention. In this study, our goal was to explore the documentation of primary prevention ICD discussions in the electronic medical records (EMRs) of eligible patients. METHODS: In 1523 patients who met criteria for primary prevention ICD therapy between 2013 and 2015, we reviewed patient charts for ICD-related documentation: "mention" by physicians or "discussion" with patient/family. The attitude of the physician and the patient/family toward ICD therapy during discussions was categorized into negative, neutral, or positive preference. Patients were followed to the end-point of ICD implantation. RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 442 days, 486 patients (32%) received an ICD. ICD was mentioned in the charts of 1105 (73%) patients, and a discussion with the patient/family about the risks and benefits of ICD was documented in 706 (46%) charts. On multivariable analyses, positive cardiologist (hazard ratio [HR]: 7.9, 95% confidence of intervals [CI]: 1.0-59.7, P < .05), electrophysiologist (HR: 7.7, 95% CI: 1.9-31.7, P < .001), and patient/family (HR: 9.9, 95% CI: 6.2-15.7, P < .001) preferences toward ICD therapy during the first documented ICD discussion were independently associated with ICD implantation. CONCLUSIONS: In a large cohort of patients eligible for primary prevention ICD therapy, a discussion with the patient/family about the risks and benefits of ICD implantation was documented in less than 50% of the charts. More consistent documentation of the shared decision making around ICD therapy is needed.

Persistent sex disparities in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy.

BACKGROUND: Clinical guidelines recommend cardioverter defibrillator implantation for patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. Despite this, women and minorities have been less likely to receive implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy than white men. We examined race and sex differences in ICD implantation in a recent cohort. METHODS: Using cross-sectional, retrospective analyses, we mined our health system's outpatient electronic medical records to assess age, race, sex, medications, and comorbidities for patients aged ≥18 years with ejection fraction ≤ 35% during 2014. While adjusting for confounding variables such as medications, age, and comorbidities, we conducted a multivariable logistic regression assessing whether racial and sex differences in ICD therapy persist. RESULTS: Among 5,156 outpatients with ejection fraction ≤35%, 1,681 (32.6%) patients had an ICD present at the time of their index outpatient visit in 2014. Women were less likely to have an ICD than men (25.0% vs 36.3%, P < 0.01), and black patients were less likely to have an ICD than white patients (28.0% vs 33.2%, P  =  0.02). In adjusted multivariable analyses, women were less like to have ICDs (adjusted odds ratio [OR]  =  0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58-0.79, P < 0.01) but the race difference dissipated (adjusted OR for black race  =  0.86, 95% CI, 0.68-1.08, P  =  0.18). CONCLUSIONS: In this large, outpatient cohort, we have shown that sex differences in ICD therapy continue to exist, but the difference in ICD prevalence by race was attenuated. Dedicated studies are required to fully understand the causes of persistent sex differences in ICD therapy.

Impact of Ablation during Index Hospitalization on All-Cause Mortality in Patients with Typical Atrial Flutter: Insights from National Multicenter Database.

Background We sought to assess the impact of ablation during index hospitalization (IH) on all-cause mortality (ACM) in patients presenting with newly diagnosed typical atrial flutter (tAFL) as compared with patients without ablation, irrespective of optimal rate or rhythm control medications. Methods We identified patients with newly diagnosed tAFL in the TriNetX Research Network between January 20, 2010, and January 20, 2021. Using International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10) codes, patients were stratified into those who had undergone ablation during IH and those who did not undergo the procedure. Results were assessed using propensity score matching (PSM) analysis as well as Kaplan-Meier curves. Results A total of 12,986 (N) patients (aged 35-85 years) met our inclusion criteria. Of those, 3,665 had undergone ablation during IH compared with 9,321 patients who did not. Patients in the ablation group (mean age 64.3 ± 10.1 years) had a higher prevalence of hypertension (80 vs. 78.3%, p = 0.02), respectively. PSM created two well-matched groups of 3,652/3,652 patients each with an ACM of ablation of 4.5 versus 7.8% ( p = 0.01) at 6 months, 6.6 versus 11.4% ( p = 0.01) at 12 months, and 14.5 versus 20.9% ( p < 0.001) at 36 months of follow-up. Survival data were confirmed through Kaplan-Meier analysis using a log-rank test. Conclusion From a large, federated, multicenter population database, we report significant survival benefit of ablation during IH in patients presenting with new tAFL diagnosis. Kaplan-Meier mortality curves confirmed survival advantage with ablation at 6, 12, and 36 months of follow-up in this cohort.

RNA interference and ischemic injury.

In the early period of 21st century, RNA interference (RNAi) had emerged as one of the most important discoveries. This highly conserved endogenous gene silencing mechanism has been largely exploited as a powerful tool to determine biological functions of each gene. Both direct introduction of chemically synthesized small interference RNA (siRNA) and a plasmid or viral vectors encoding for siRNA can allow especially stable RNA knockdown. Recently, it has been widely used in the production of therapeutic drugs against hepatitis or immuno-deficiency viruses in human beings. Here, we provide a brief overview of the RNAi mechanism and the technology of RNAi on ischemic injury.

Lower socioeconomic status is associated with increased long-term mortality after sudden cardiac arrest.

BACKGROUND: Determinants of long-term survival after sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) are not fully elucidated. We investigated the impact of patients' socioeconomic status (SES) on long-term mortality in SCA survivors. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between SES, as estimated by median household income by zip code of residence, and long-term survival after SCA. METHODS: We analyzed the electronic medical records of patients who presented to our institution with SCA between 2000 and 2012 and were discharged alive. Patients were stratified into quartiles by median household income of their home zip code. Baseline characteristics of patients were compared by income quartiles. The impact of SES on mortality was assessed using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model incorporating all unbalanced covariates. RESULTS: Our cohort consisted of 1420 patients (mean age of 62 years; 41% men; 82% white). Over a 3.6-year median follow-up, 47% of patients died. After adjusting for unbalanced baseline covariates, patients in the poorest income quartile had a 25% increase in their risk of death compared to other SCA survivors (hazard ratios = 1.25, 95% confidence interval 1.00-1.56, P = .046). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, lower SES is an independent predictor of long-term mortality in survivors of SCA. Designing interventions to improve survival after SCA requires attention to patients' social and economic factors.

Cluster Randomized Trial Examining the Impact of Automated Best Practice Alert on Rates of Implantable Defibrillator Therapy.

Background Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are indicated in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%, but many eligible patients do not receive this therapy. In this cluster randomized trial, we investigated the impact of a best practice alert (BPA) through the electronic health records on the rates of electrophysiology referrals, ICD implantations, and all-cause mortality in severe cardiomyopathy patients. Methods and Results Providers in the Heart and Vascular Institute (n=106) and in General Internal Medicine (n=89) were randomized to receive or not receive a BPA recommending consideration for ICD implantation. Patients belonging to the BPA and no BPA groups of providers were followed to the end points of electrophysiology referrals, ICD implantations, and all-cause mortality. Between 2013 and 2015, patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction were managed by 93 providers in the BPA (n=997 patients) and 102 providers in the no BPA (n=909 patients) groups. Patients in the 2 groups had comparable baseline characteristics. After a median follow-up of 36 months, 638 (33%) patients were referred to electrophysiology, 536 (27%) received an ICD, and 445 (23%) died. Patients in the BPA group were more likely to be referred to electrophysiology (hazard ratio=1.23; P=0.026), to receive ICD therapy (hazard ratio=1.35; P=0.006), and exhibited a trend towards slightly lower mortality (hazard ratio=0.85; P=0.091). Conclusions Delivering a BPA through the electronic health record recommending to providers consideration of ICD implantation when the left ventricular ejection fraction is ≤35% improves the rates of electrophysiology referrals and ICD therapy in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction.

Implantable Defibrillator Therapy in Cardiac Arrest Survivors With a Reversible Cause.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy in survivors of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA), except in those with completely reversible causes. We sought to examine the impact of ICD therapy on mortality in survivors of SCA associated with reversible causes. METHODS AND RESULTS: We evaluated the records of 1433 patients managed at our institution between 2000 and 2012 who were discharged alive after SCA. A reversible and correctable cause was identified in 792 (55%) patients. Reversible SCA cause was defined as significant electrolyte or metabolic abnormality, evidence of acute myocardial infarction or ischemia, recent initiation of antiarrhythmic drug or illicit drug use, or other reversible circumstances. Of the 792 SCA survivors because of a reversible and correctable cause (age 61±15 years, 40% women), 207 (26%) patients received an ICD after their index SCA. During a mean follow-up of 3.8±3.1 years, 319 (40%) patients died. ICD implantation was highly associated with lower all-cause mortality (P<0.001) even after correcting for unbalanced baseline characteristics (P<0.001). In subgroup analyses, only patients whose SCA was not associated with myocardial infarction extracted benefit from ICD (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In survivors of SCA because of a reversible and correctable cause, ICD therapy is associated with lower all-cause mortality except if the SCA was because of myocardial infarction. These data deserve further investigation in a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial, as they may have important and immediate clinical implications.