The academic outcomes of working memory and metacognitive strategy training in children: A double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Working memory training has been shown to improve performance on untrained working memory tasks in typically developing children, at least when compared to non-adaptive training; however, there is little evidence that it improves academic outcomes. The lack of transfer to academic outcomes may be because children are only learning skills and strategies in a very narrow context, which they are unable to apply to other tasks. Metacognitive strategy interventions, which promote metacognitive awareness and teach children general strategies that can be used on a variety of tasks, may be a crucial missing link in this regard. In this double-blind randomized controlled trial, 95 typically developing children aged 9-14 years were allocated to three cognitive training programmes that were conducted daily after-school. One group received Cogmed working memory training, another group received concurrent Cogmed and metacognitive strategy training, and the control group received adaptive visual search training, which better controls for expectancy and motivation than non-adaptive training. Children were assessed on four working memory tasks, reading comprehension, and mathematical reasoning before, immediately after, and 3 months after training. Working memory training improved working memory and mathematical reasoning relative to the control group. The improvements in working memory were maintained 3 months later, and these were significantly greater for the group that received metacognitive strategy training, compared to working memory training alone. Working memory training is a potentially effective educational intervention when provided in addition to school; however, future research will need to investigate ways to maintain academic improvements long term and to optimize metacognitive strategy training to promote far-transfer. A video abstract of this article can be viewed at https://youtu.be/-7MML48ZFgw.

Telepsychotherapy With Children and Families: Lessons Gleaned From Two Decades of Translational Research.

The novel coronavirus, COVID-19, has led to sweeping changes in psychological practice and the concomitant rapid uptake of telepsychotherapy. Although telepsychotherapy is new to many clinical psychologists, there is considerable research on telepsychotherapy treatments. Nearly 2 decades of clinical research on telepsychotherapy treatments with children with neurological conditions has the potential to inform emerging clinical practice in the age of COVID-19. Toward that end, we synthesized findings from 14 clinical trials of telepsychotherapy problem-solving and parent-training interventions involving more than 800 children and families with diverse diagnoses, including traumatic brain injury, epilepsy, brain tumors, congenital heart disease, and perinatal stroke. We summarize efficacy across studies and clinical populations and report feasibility and acceptability data from the perspectives of parents, children, and psychotherapists. We describe adaptation for international contexts and strategies for troubleshooting technological challenges and working with families of varying socioeconomic strata. The extensive research literature reviewed and synthesized provides considerable support for the utility of telepsychotherapy with children with neurological conditions and their families and underscores its high level of acceptability with both diverse clinical populations and providers. During this period of heightened vulnerability and stress and reduced access to usual supports and services, telepsychotherapy approaches such as online family problem-solving treatment and online parenting skills training may allow psychologists to deliver traditional evidence-based treatments virtually while preserving fidelity and efficacy.

El nuevo coronavirus, COVID-19, ha conducido a cambios radicales en la psicología. práctica y el rápido consumo concomitante de telepsicoterapia. A pesar de que la telepsicoterapia es nueva para muchos psicólogos clínicos, existe una investigación considerable sobre tratamientos de telepsicoterapia. Casi dos décadas de investigación clínica sobre los tratamientos de telepsicoterapia con niños con afecciones neurológicas tienen la potencial para informar la práctica clínica emergente en la edad de COVID-19. Hacia ese fin, sintetizamos los resultados de 14 ensayos clínicos de resolución de problemas de telepsicoterapia e intervenciones de capacitación para padres que involucran a más de 800 niños y familias con diagnósticos diversos que incluyen lesión cerebral traumática, epilepsia, tumores cerebrales, enfermedad cardíaca congénita y accidente cerebrovascular perinatal. Resumimos la eficacia entre los estudios y poblaciones clínicas e reportamos datos de viabilidad y aceptabilidad desde las perspectivas de padres, hijos y psicoterapeutas. Describimos adaptacion para contextos internacionales y estrategias para resolver problemas tecnológicos y trabajar con familias de estratos socioeconómicos variables. La extensa literatura de investigación revisada y sintetizado proporciona un apoyo considerable para la utilidad de la telepsicoterapia con niños con afecciones neurológicas y sus familias y subraya su alto nivel de aceptabilidad con diversas poblaciones clínicas y proveedores. Durante este período de mayor vulnerabilidad y estrés y menor acceso a los apoyos habituales y servicios, enfoques de telepsicoterapia como tratamiento em línea para resolución de problemas familiares y la capacitación en habilidades para padres en línea pueden permitir que los psicólogos brinden tratamientos tradicionales basados en evidencia virtualmente mientras se preserva la fidelidad y la eficacia.

Adapting intervention approaches to new contexts: Three case studies of international adaptation of the Teen Online Problem Solving (TOPS) program.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: To describe the process of adapting the evidence-based Teen Online Problem Solving (TOPS) program, a telehealth problem-solving treatment addressing executive function and behavior regulation challenges in adolescents with traumatic brain injury, in Italy, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom. Research Method/Design: We describe the process of adapting and translating the TOPS program in 3 case studies with unique methods and samples. In Italy, 14 parents of adolescents with TBI participated in focus groups, and 2 adolescents with TBI and their parents and 2 physicians provided input on the resulting translation. In New Zealand, an independent Maori cultural advisor reviewed the content, and 6 adolescent-parent dyads and 2 health professionals completed the 10 modules independently over a five-week period to inform adaptation. In the United Kingdom, a team of neuropsychologists and a parent of an adolescent with ABI reviewed and adapted the content through successive iterations. RESULTS: In Italy, suggested changes included greater emphasis on nonverbal communication and clearer examples of inappropriate problem-solving responses. In New Zealand, parents and adolescents rated the program as acceptable and helpful. Suggestions included incorporating familiar Maori settings, integrating religion, and developing videos with New Zealand adolescents. In the United Kingdom, iterative refinements focused on adapting TOPS for other acquired brain injuries and reflecting cross-national differences (e.g., drinking age). CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: These 3 case studies suggest that programs such as TOPS developed in 1 cultural context can be broadly acceptable in other contexts, with adaptations focusing on tailoring to reflect the unique cultural and linguistic setting. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).