Thirty-day readmission after ventral hernia repair: predictable or preventable?

INTRODUCTION: Thirty-day readmission has become an increasingly scrutinized event in the field of surgery, especially in light of projected cuts in reimbursement. Although studies have evaluated large populations, little work has been done on procedure-specific populations. Our objective is to determine if any factors are predictive of 30-day readmission in patients undergoing ventral hernia repair. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of all patients who underwent laparoscopic or open ventral hernia repair over a 4-year period. We evaluated patients based on demographic, preoperative, and operative variables. The primary outcome measure was all-cause 30-day readmission. RESULTS: There were 420 patients identified for evaluation. Fifty-one (12%) patients required readmission to the hospital within 30 days. The most common indications for readmission were wound infection (57%; n=29) and gastrointestinal (GI) complication (19%; n=10). On analysis, demographic variables were similar between the two groups. However, patients who were readmitted were more likely to have had more prior abdominal surgeries (4 vs. 2; p<0.0001), more previous hernia repairs (2 vs. 1; p=0.006), open repair (76% vs. 46%; p<0.0001), and active abdominal infection (37% vs. 12%; p<0.0001). In addition, patients also had longer procedures (235 vs. 150 min; p<0.0001) and larger defects (350 vs. 96 cm2; p<0.0001). On multivariate analysis, independent predictors of readmission included presence of fistula [odds ratio (OR)=8.55; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.21-22.72], defect size>300 cm2 (OR=5.35; 95% CI 2.59-11.05), active abdominal infection (OR=4.37; 95% CI 2.28-8.37), and open repair (OR=4.27; 95% CI 2.17-8.42). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing ventral hernia repair can represent a complex group. In our practice, enterocutaneous fistula, defect size>300 cm2, active abdominal infection, and open repair were all independent risk factors (OR>4) for 30-day readmission after ventral hernia repair. Recognition of these high-risk patients can help focus resources to increase surveillance and possible early intervention to reduce readmissions.

Improved renal function after conversion from tacrolimus/sirolimus to tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil in kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: There is limited data on the potential nephrotoxicity of sirolimus (SRL) and tacrolimus (TAC) in combination. METHODS: We reviewed the course of 97 kidney transplant patients treated with SRL and reduced-dose TAC. Conversion from SRL to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was prescribed in a minority (n = 19) for various nonrenal side effects. We compared outcomes of converted patients to those remaining on TAC/SRL (n = 78). RESULTS: TAC levels were increased in converters (P = 0.009). Rejection rates were similar between groups over 18 months (21% vs. 16%, p = ns). Serum creatinine (Cr) and MDRD glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were similar between groups at nadir and six-months, but at 18 months the percent change from six-month Cr was +17% in non-converters vs. -10% in converters (P = 0.004 for the difference). The difference in GFR between groups at 18 months was also significant (P = 0.01). By multivariate analysis, only conversion to MMF was associated with a greater percent change in Cr from 6 to 18 months (P = 0.015). Conversion to MMF also correlated with higher GFR at 18 months independent of rejection, delayed graft function, and ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: Conversion from TAC/SRL to TAC/MMF led to improved renal function despite increased TAC exposure after conversion.

Differences in patient and transplant professional perceptions of immunosuppression-induced cosmetic side effects.

BACKGROUND: A two-part study was initiated to compare kidney transplant patient and transplant professional perceptions regarding immunosuppression-related physical changes and their impact on transplant recipients. METHODS: Parallel surveys were developed and administered to transplant patients and active transplant clinicians. RESULTS: Eighty percent of surveyed patients reported immunosuppression-induced hirsutism, gingival hyperplasia, acne, alopecia, or cushingoid facies. Hirsutism (94%) and gingival hyperplasia (51%) occurred more frequently in cyclosporine patients (p < 0.01); alopecia (30%) occurred more frequently in tacrolimus patients (p < 0.01). Patient reported incidence of physical changes significantly exceeded observations by professionals for every condition (p < 0.01), however 84.4% of affected patients reported feeling "happy to endure" changes "for the sake of having a transplant." Patients also reported emotional and social effects due to physical changes, an outcome underestimated by transplant professionals (p < 0.01). Patients and professionals communicated about physical changes; however, more than half of affected patients believed communication occurred "rarely/never" while over half of the professionals believed communication occurred "every visit/most of the time." Although most physicians believed changes could be addressed, doctors recommended treatment for less than half of the affected patients. When recommended therapy changes were pursued, treatments were effective in the majority of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Incidence of immunosuppression-related physical changes is high and somewhat dependent on drug regimen. Although patients seem willing to accept cosmetic changes for the sake of having a transplant, physical changes have a psychosocial impact that is underestimated by clinicians. Immunosuppression-related physical changes remain underaddressed; effective interventions offer opportunities for improved care.

Hemodialysis vintage, black ethnicity, and pretransplantation antidonor cellular immunity in kidney transplant recipients.

Prolonged exposure to dialysis before transplantation and black ethnicity are known risk factors for acute rejection and graft loss in kidney transplant recipients. Because the strength of the primed antidonor T cell repertoire before transplantation also is associated with rejection and graft dysfunction, this study sought to determine whether hemodialysis (HD) vintage and/or black ethnicity affected donor-directed T cell immunity. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISPOT) assay was used to measure the frequency of peripheral T cells that expressed IFN-gamma in response to donor stimulator cells before transplantation in 100 kidney recipients. Acute rejection occurred in 38% of ELISPOT (+) patients versus 14% of ELISPOT (-) patients (P = 0.008). The median (HD) vintage was 46 mo (0 to 125 mo) in ELISPOT (+) patients versus 24 mo (0 to 276 mo) in ELISPOT (-) patients (P = 0.009). Black recipients had a greater median HD vintage (55 versus 14 mo in nonblack recipients; P < 0.001). Black recipients with less HD exposure had a low incidence of an ELISPOT (+) test, similar to nonblack recipients. Among variables examined, only HD vintage remained a significant positive correlate with an ELISPOT (+) result (odds ratio per year of HD 1.3; P = 0.003). These data suggest that the risk for developing cross-reactive antidonor T cell immunity increases with longer HD vintage, providing an explanation for the previously observed relationship between increased dialysis exposure and worse posttransplantation outcome. Longer HD vintage may also explain the increased T cell alloreactivity that previously was observed in black kidney recipients.

Successful renal transplantation despite low levels of donor-specific HLA class I antibody without IVIg or plasmapheresis.

We prospectively transplanted 10 primary kidney recipients with deceased donor organs (nine kidney and one pancreas/kidney) when their flow cytometric T-cell IgG, HLA class I donor-specific crossmatch was positive but the AHG T-cell crossmatch was negative, with a median follow-up of 1.8 yr. No pre- or peri-operative IVIg or plasmapheresis was administered to any patient. All but one of the 11 organs transplanted into patients with a flow T(+)/AHG(-) crossmatch is currently functioning despite the continued presence of circulating low levels of HLA class I antibody. Flow HLA class I antigen-coated beads showed the presence of at least one donor-specific HLA class I antibody at transplantation in each of the 10 cases. No rejections were observed in seven of the 10 cases (70%). Six rejection episodes, four cellular and two humoral, occurred in three patients. Each rejection was successfully treated. The only graft loss occurred in a kidney recipient on day 667 secondary to ischemia to the kidney because of cardiac surgery. Thus, short-term (one to two years) graft survival in primary transplants was not influenced by low levels of donor-specific HLA class I antibody present at transplantation and no prophylactic treatment such as IVIg, plasmapheresis, anti-CD20 or splenectomy was needed peri-operatively.

The risk for Chagas' disease in the Midwestern United States organ donor population is low.

PURPOSE: Several recent publications have increased awareness that transplanted organs can transmit infectious diseases. In light of the recent report describing the transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi infection by an organ donor in the United States (MMWR 2002: 51: 210), we have tested archived serum samples from our Organ Procurement Organization's (OPO's) deceased organ donors and live donors from 23 October 1995 through 1 March 2002. METHODS: A total of 1117 serum samples from 558 locally recovered deceased donors, 178 imported deceased donors, and 212 live donors were tested (several duplicates were included). Samples were screened for antibodies to T. cruzi, the protozoan parasite that causes Chagas' disease, with a passive particle agglutination assay (Fujirebio, Inc., Tokyo, Japan). Indeterminate samples (those agglutinating both sensitized and control particles) were absorbed with control antigen and re-tested. Inconclusive samples (those not yielding clearly negative or positive results) were re-tested using the original test format, and if persistently inconclusive, were assayed by radio-immune precipitation (RIPA). RESULTS: Of the 770 local OPO donors (deceased and live donor) and the 178 imported donors tested, 52 (5.5%) were indeterminate, but following absorption, all were negative. Forty-four samples (4.6%) were inconclusive and after re-testing 34 were negative while 10 remained inconclusive. Those 10 samples were found to be negative by RIPA. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of transmission of Chagas' disease by organ transplantation in the Midwestern United States is low because during a 6.5 year period, none of our deceased or live donors tested positive for antibodies to T. cruzi. Although the passive particle agglutination test is simple to perform, easy to interpret and rapid enough to be used in screening organ donors, because of the rate of false positive results, it should only be utilized when the donor population is at high risk for previous exposure to T. cruzi.

Increased access to transplantation for blood group B cadaveric waiting list candidates by using A2 kidneys: time for a new national system?

Since blood group B end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients have less access to donor kidneys and a higher minority composition than any other blood group, the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) approved a voluntary national kidney allocation variance to allow organ procurement organizations (OPOs) to preferentially allocate A2 and A2B kidneys to B candidates. The Midwest Transplant Network OPO has preferentially allocated and transplanted kidneys from blood group A2 and A2B donors to our blood group B waiting list candidates for more than 7 years to increase access to kidneys for the B candidates on our OPO-wide waiting list. Between 1994 and 2000, a total of 121 blood group B ESRD patients from our OPO-wide cadaveric kidney waiting list were transplanted. Thirty-four per cent (41/121) of those B candidates received either an A2 or an A2B kidney. One- and 5-year graft survival rates for the group of B recipients of A2 or A2B kidneys were 91 and 85% (died with functioning graft [DWFG] censored), respectively, which were not significantly different from those of 91 and 80% for the 80 B recipients of B or O kidneys (Wilcoxon = 0.48; log-rank = 0.55). These data support the national trial for additional OPOs to voluntarily allocate A2 and A2B kidneys preferentially to B waiting list candidates, thus increasing access of blood group B patients to renal transplantation.

HLA points assigned in cadaveric kidney allocation should be revisited: an analysis of HLA class II molecularly typed patients and donors.

The points now assigned for the quality of HLA match have received significant scrutiny to be modified in an effort to help reduce disparity in access to kidneys of minority groups, and since differences in graft survival between groups of patients in each of the HLA matched groups is less now than in the past. We analyzed long-term (5-year) graft survival in 746 DR DNA typed recipients of cadaveric kidneys transplanted from 1994-2001 whose donors were also DR DNA typed, with allocation based on those DNA-based typings. Five-year graft survival was not significantly different for recipient groups irrespective of if they had zero (84%), one (92%), two (89%), or three to four B, DR mismatches (79%) (log-rank = 0.15; died with a functioning graft [DWFG] censored). Mismatching of three and four DR and DQ antigens in black but not white patients was associated with significantly worse survival (Relative Risk = 2.9) (p = 0.002). The incidence of minority transplants in the well-matched group (zero and one B, DR mismatch), 12.8% (20/156) was over half that of the less well-matched group, 27.1% (160/590) (p < 0.001). Our data indicate that the current HLA-B, DR-based point system used to allocate kidneys warrants re-evaluation. Our data, taken in the context of the UNOS data, which has recently been re-evaluated, suggest that the only HLA-DR remain as a component of the national kidney allocation algorithm so as to increase access of kidneys to minorities and minimize graft loss.

ABO blood group influences a candidate's likelihood of receiving an HLA zero antigen mismatch kidney.

National sharing of HLA zero-mismatched kidneys has improved long-term graft survival. The distribution of those HLA-matched kidneys by ABO blood group, however, has not been examined. Utilizing the UNOS/OPTN (United Network for Organ Sharing/Organ Procurement Transplantation Network) database, we analysed 112 971 kidney waiting list registrations added during 6/3/95-31/12/00, and 8162 HLA zero-mismatched (0 mm) primary kidney transplants in the USA during 1/1/88-31/3/02. We also analyzed A isoagglutinin titer histories for 87 blood group B end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients for whom at least 1 yr of testing was done. Blood group A patients received 40.1% of the HLA-0 mm kidneys while having a 26.5% representation on the national waiting list. Blood group B patients comprised 17.4% of the waiting list, but received only 10.4% of the HLA-0 mm kidneys. Most (89.6%) blood group B patients awaiting kidney transplantation have low levels of A isoagglutinins, making them eligible to receive a blood group A(2) kidney transplant. The national HLA-0 mm kidney allocation sharing system's imbalance by ABO blood group could be partially resolved in the future by allocating HLA-0 mm blood group A(2) kidneys to B patients.

Flow cytometry beads rather than the antihuman globulin method should be used to detect HLA Class I IgG antibody (PRA) in cadaveric renal regraft candidates.

HLA Class I antibody screening can be performed by flow cytometry using a mixture of 30 distinct bead populations each coated with the Class I antigen phenotype derived from different cell lines. In this study we compared the efficacy of Class I antibody screens done by flow cytometry beads with the antihuman globulin (AHG) method for patients awaiting cadaveric renal retransplantation. Class I panel reactive antibody (PRA) screening by flow cytometric beads of 21 regraft serum samples that had all been found to be negative by AHG DTT Class I PRA, revealed that 57.1% (12 of 21) had a flow Class I PRA of > or = 10%. Furthermore, when five regraft sera with an intermediate PRA were screened (mean AHG DTT PRA = 33.2 +/- 13%) the mean flow Class I PRA almost doubled (mean flow PRA = 72.4 +/- 10.2%) (p < 0.01). When active UNOS waiting list regraft candidates, after several months of screening the Class I PRA by flow beads, were divided into the three PRA categories based on their peak flow Class I PRA value (0-20%, 21-79% and > or = 80%), the incidence of a positive flow cross-match was 0%, 72% and 85% and the incidence of retransplantation was 60%, 22% and 10%, in each of these groups, respectively. These data provided our histocompatibility laboratory with the rationale to stop performing the AHG PRA and perform only the flow Class I PRA method for regraft candidates.