Epithelial to mesenchymal transition markers expressed in circulating tumour cells of early and metastatic breast cancer patients.

INTRODUCTION: Epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) is considered an essential process in the metastatic cascade. EMT is characterised by upregulation of vimentin, Twist, Snail, Slug and Sip1 among others. Metastasis is also associated with the presence of circulating tumour cells (CTCs) and disseminated tumour cells in the blood and bone marrow, respectively, of breast cancer patients, but the expression of EMT markers in these cells has not been reported so far. METHODS: The expression of Twist and vimentin in CTCs of 25 metastatic and 25 early breast cancer patients was investigated by using double-immunofluorescence experiments in isolated peripheral blood mononuclear cell cytospins using anti-cytokeratin (anti-CK) anti-mouse (A45-B/B3) and anti-Twist or anti-vimentin anti-rabbit antibodies. RESULTS: Among early breast cancer patients, vimentin-and Twist-expressing CK(+) CTCs were identified in 77% and 73% of the patients, respectively, and in 100% of the patients with metastatic breast cancer for both markers (P = 0.004 and P = 0.037, respectively). Among patients with early disease, 56% and 53% of the CK(+) CTCs were double-stained with vimentin and Twist, and the corresponding values for metastatic patients were 74% and 97%, respectively (P = 0.005 and P = 0.0001, respectively). The median expression of CK(+)vimentin(+) and CK(+)Twist(+) cells per patient in metastatic patients was 98% and 100%, and in an adjuvant chemotherapy setting the corresponding numbers were 56% and 40.6%, respectively. Triple-staining experiments revealed that all CK(+)Twist(+) or CK(+)vimentin(+) cells were also CD45(-), confirming their epithelial origin. Immunomagnetic separation of CTCs and triple-immunofluorescence with anti-CK/anti-Twist/anti-vimentin antibodies demonstrated that both mesenchymal markers could be coexpressed in the same CK(+) cell, since 64% of the total identified CTCs were triple-stained. There was a significant correlation (P = 0.005) between the number of CTCs expressing Twist and vimentin within the same setting. CONCLUSIONS: CTCs expressing Twist and vimentin, suggestive of EMT, are identified in patients with breast cancer. The high incidence of these cells in patients with metastatic disease compared to early stage breast cancer strongly supports the notion that EMT is involved in the metastatic potential of CTCs.

Cytokeratin-19 mRNA-positive circulating tumor cells during follow-up of patients with operable breast cancer: prognostic relevance for late relapse.

BACKGROUND: The detection of cytokeratin-19 (CK-19) mRNA-positive circulating tumor cells (CTC) before and/or after adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancer is associated with poor clinical outcome. Reliable prognostic markers for late disease relapse are not available. In this study we investigated the value of CTC detection during the first five years of follow-up in predicting late disease relapse. METHODS: Blood was analyzed from 312 women with operable breast cancer who had not experienced disease relapse during the first two years of follow-up. A real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for CK-19 mRNA was used to detect CTC three months after the completion of adjuvant chemotherapy and every six months thereafter for a follow-up period of five years. RESULTS: Eighty patients (25.6% of the study population) remained CTC free throughout the five-year period. A change in CTC status was observed in 133 patients (42.6%); 64 patients (20.5%) with initially CK-19 mRNA-positive CTC during the first 24 months turned CTC-negative afterwards while 69 (22.1%) who were initially CTC-negative became CTC-positive. Ninety-nine patients (31.7%) remained persistently CK-19 mRNA-positive. After a median follow-up period of 107 months (range: 38 to 161 months), the persistently CTC-positive patients with either hormonal receptor positive or negative tumors, had a higher risk of late-disease relapse compared to the persistently CTC-negative patients (36.4% versus 11.2%, P <0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that persistently CTC-positive patients also had a shorter disease-free (P = 0.001) and overall survival (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Persistent detection of CK-19 mRNA-positive CTC during the first five years of follow-up is associated with an increased risk of late relapse and death in patients with operable breast cancer and indicates the presence of chemo-and hormonotherapy-resistant residual disease. This prognostic evaluation may be useful when deciding on subsequent adjuvant systemic therapy.

What's new on circulating tumor cells? A meeting report.

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) provide unique information for the management of cancer patients. The 7th International Symposium on Minimal Residual Cancer has focused on state of the art research, including exciting advances in understanding the biology of metastasis, CTCs and tumor dormancy. Particular emphasis was placed on the relationship of CTCs to cancer stem cells (CSCs) and the relevance of most recent findings for the development of new targeted therapies. CTCs were evaluated as promising tumor biomarkers and the design and results of the first clinical trials to determine their clinical utility were discussed together with state of the art technology platforms for CTC imaging, detection, quantification and molecular characterization. A liquid biopsy approach that can be used for prognostic and predictive purposes was proposed for the analysis of CTCs.

A randomized phase III study of the docetaxel/carboplatin combination versus docetaxel single-agent as second line treatment for patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: To compare the activity and toxicity of docetaxel/carboplatin (DC) doublet vs single agent docetaxel (D) as second-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Patients pre-treated with front-line platinum-free regimens, were randomized to receive either docetaxel/carboplatin (DC), (docetaxel 50 mg/m2; carboplatin AUC4; both drugs administered on days 1 and 15) or docetaxel single-agent (D), (docetaxel 50 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15). RESULTS: Response rate was similar between the two arms (DC vs D: 10.4% vs 7.7%; p = 0.764). After a median follow-up time of 28.0 months for DC arm and 34.5 months for D arm, progression free survival (PFS) was significantly higher in the DC arm (DC vs D:3.33 months vs 2.60 months; p-value = 0.012), while no significant difference was observed in terms of overall survival (OS) (DC vs D: 10.3 months vs 7.70 months; p-value = 0.550). Chemotherapy was well-tolerated and grade III/IV toxicities were relatively infrequent. No toxic deaths were observed. CONCLUSIONS: This study has not achieved its primary objective of significant OS prolongation with docetaxel/carboplatin combination over single-agent docetaxel in patients who had not received front-line docetaxel; however, the docetaxel/carboplatin combination was associated with a significant clinical benefit in terms of PFS.

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in combination with vinorelbine as salvage treatment in pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer: a multicentre phase II study.

PURPOSE: To investigate the activity and tolerance of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in combination with vinorelbine in pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND TREATMENT: Thirty-six women with metastatic breast cancer were enrolled. The median age was 64 years, 80% of the patients had a performance status of 0-1, 30 (83%) had visceral disease and 83% had received prior taxanes while 50% anthracyclines. Treatment consisted of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (40 mg/m2 on day 1) and vinorelbine (25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15) every 4 weeks. RESULTS: In an intention-to-treat analysis 2 (6%) complete and 12 (33%) partial responses were observed (overall response rate 39%; 95% CI: 23-54.8%); 8 (22%) and 14 (39%) patients experienced stable and progressive disease, respectively. The median TTP was 6.5 months and the median survival time 14.2 months. The 1-year survival rate was 54.1%. Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred in 21 (58%) patients, grade 3-4 anemia in four (11%) and grade 4 thrombocytopenia in one (3%). Two (6%) patients developed febrile neutropenia. Non-hematologic toxicity was mild and easily manageable. There was no clinically important cardiac toxicity or treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and vinorelbine is an active and well tolerated salvage regimen in patients with metastatic breast cancer which merits further evaluation.

Recurrent Cerebellar Desmoplastic/Nodular Medulloblastoma in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) in the Elderly. A Cytologic Diagnosis.

Desmoplastic medulloblastoma is a rare subtype of medulloblastoma in childhood and more rare in adults. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) occurrence is frequent and important for treatment and prognosis. We report the CSF cytologic features of recurrent desmoplastic/nodular medulloblastoma in a 30-aged male.

High incidence of pulmonary toxicity of weekly docetaxel and gemcitabine in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: results of a dose-finding study.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated doses (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of the weekly administration of docetaxel and gemcitabine as first-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naïve patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed unresectable stage III(B) or IV NSCLC were enrolled onto the study. Escalated doses of gemcitabine (starting dose 700 mg/m(2) per week) and docetaxel (starting dose 30 mg/m(2) per week) were given on a weekly basis for three consecutive weeks in cycles of 4 weeks. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients received a total of 94 chemotherapy cycles. At the doses of docetaxel 40 mg/m(2) per week and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) per week, the MTD had not yet been reached. However, the study was prematurely closed because of a high incidence of severe pulmonary adverse events. Six (23%) patients developed fever and pulmonary dysfunction (severe dyspnea, hypoxia in association with diffuse interstitial pneumonitis), which was fatal in two of them. No risk factors were identified contributing to these pulmonary adverse events; four patients had a low absolute number of peripheral blood CD4+ lymphocytes. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in five (19%) patients and grade 3/4 anemia in two (8%). CONCLUSION: The weekly administration of gemcitabine and docetaxel in patients with advanced NSCLC is associated with a high incidence of severe pulmonary toxicity, which does not seem to be dose-related. The regimen cannot be used outside a clinical protocol.

A dose escalation study of docetaxel and oxaliplatin combination in patients with metastatic breast and non-small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of docetaxel in combination with oxaliplatin (L-OHP) as first-line treatment of patients with advanced breast (ABC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-two patients (26 with NSCLC and 26 with ABC), who had not received prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease, were enrolled. The patients' median age was 64 years, and 42 (71%) had a performance status (WHO) 0-1. Docetaxel was given as a 1-hour infusion after standard premedication on day 1 and L-OHP as a 2 to 6-hour infusion on day 2 every 3 weeks. Doses were escalated at increments of 10 mg/m2. RESULTS: The DLT1 was reached at the doses of docetaxel 75 mg/m2 and L-OHP 80 mg/m2. The addition of rhG-CSF permitted further dose escalation (DLT2: docetaxel 90 mg/m2 and L-OHP 130 mg/m2). The dose-limiting events were grade 4 neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, grades 3 or 4 diarrhea and grade 3 fatigue. Out of 239 delivered cycles, grades 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 22 (9%) cycles with 5 (2%) neutropenic febrile episodes. There was one septic death. Grades 3 or 4 fatigue was observed in seven (13%) patients and grades 3-4 diarrhea in five (10%). Out of 42 patients evaluable for response, seven (27%) patients with ABC and five (19%) patients with NSCLC experienced a partial response. CONCLUSION: The combination of docetaxel and oxaliplatin is a feasible and well-tolerated regimen. The recommended doses for future phase II studies are 75 mg/m2 for docetaxel on day 1 and 70 mg/m2 for L-OHP on day 2 without rhG-CSF support and 85 mg/m2 and 130 mg/m2, respectively, with rhG-CSF support.

A dose escalation study of leucovorin (LV) and 48-hour continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil in combination with cyclophosphamide and vinorelbine in pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated doses (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of vinorelbine (VNR) with fixed doses of cyclophosphamide (CPM) and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) pretreated with anthracyclines and taxanes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients with MBC pretreated with anthracyclines and taxanes were enrolled. VNR was administered as a 10-min intravenous infusion (i.v.) on day 1 at escalated doses with CPM 300 mg/m2 i.v. bolus and LV 500 mg/m2 as a 2-hour i.v. infusion, followed by 5-FU 1500 mg/m2 as a 22-hour continuous infusion (c.i.) for two consecutive days. Treatment was repeated every two weeks. RESULTS: At the dose of VNR 22.5 mg/m2 without rhG-CSF and 25 mg/m2 with rhG-CSF support, the DLT had been reached. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in six (33%) patients and in fourteen (27%) cycles with no episode of febrile neutropenia. One (5.5%) patient developed grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Grade 3 neurotoxicity occurred in two patients and grade 2 and 3 asthenia in five (28%). CONCLUSION: The recommended doses for phase II studies are 20 mg/m2 for VNR (22.5 mg/m2 with rhG-CSF support) and 300 mg/m2 for CPM on day 1, with 500 mg/m2 for LV and 1500 mg/m2 for 5-FU on days 1 and 2.

Oxaliplatin with high-dose leucovorin and infusional 5-fluorouracil in irinotecan-pretreated patients with advanced colorectal cancer (ACC).

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of the bimonthly administration of oxaliplatin in combination with high-dose leucovorin and infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (FOLFOX2 regimen) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (ACC) who did not respond or whose disease progressed within 3 months after front-line treatment with CPT-11-containing regimens. Forty-one patients with ACC who did not respond or whose disease progressed after front-line treatment with CPT-11 + 5-FU/leucovorin were enrolled. Oxaliplatin was administered at the dose of 100 mg/m2 on day 1 as a 2-hour infusion simultaneously but through different lines with leucovorin (500 mg/m2 on days 1 and 2); 5-FU was given at the dose of 1,750 mg/m2/d as a 22-hour continuous intravenous infusion on days 1 and 2. The regimen was repeated every 2 weeks. In an intention-to-treat analysis, complete response was achieved in one (2.4%) and partial response in six (14.6%) patients (overall response rate: 17%; 95% CI: 5.56-28.59%); stable disease and progressive disease were observed in 15 (36.6%) and in 19 (46.31%) patients, respectively. The median duration of response and the median time to tumor progression were 6 and 8.5 months, respectively. The median overall survival was 12 months and the probability for 1-year survival was 42.9%. Grade III/IV neutropenia occurred in 17 (41%) patients and febrile neutropenia developed in one of them (2%). There was no treatment-related death. Peripheral neuropathy greater than or equal to grade II occurred in 24 (58%) patients. Other toxicities were relatively mild. The bimonthly administration of oxaliplatin in combination with high-dose leucovorin and 48-hour continuous infusion of 5-FU is a relatively active and well-tolerated regimen for patients with ACC resistant or refractory to CPT-11 + 5-FU (continuous infusion)/leucovorin.

A dose-escalation study of pemetrexed and docetaxel in non-small-cell lung cancer.

A phase I study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated doses (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) of pemetrexed and docetaxel in patients with advanced unresectable or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients were treated with escalating doses of pemetrexed (400-600 mg/m(2) as a 10-min intravenous infusion) and docetaxel (65-85 mg/m(2) as a 1-h intravenous infusion) on day 1, every 3 weeks. An expanded accrual at the level of the recommended dose (RD) had been scheduled. Forty-two patients with metastatic NSCLC were enrolled in the phase I study and 20 additional patients at the RD level. The MTD could not be reached even at the doses of 550 and 85 mg/m(2) for pemetrexed and docetaxel, respectively, which are higher than the recommended dose for each drug given as a single agent. Therefore, the RD was defined at 500 mg/m(2) pemetrexed and 75 mg/m(2) docetaxel. Among the 164 administered chemotherapy cycles (phase I part), there were three episodes of febrile neutropenia whereas 13 (7.9%) and 11 (6.7%) cycles were complicated with grade III and IV neutropenia, respectively. Three patients developed grade III/IV thrombocytopenia. Non-hematologic toxicity was mild with grade III fatigue occurring in three (6.7%) patients. There was no toxic death. The favorable toxicity profile of the regimen was confirmed in patients treated at the RD level. Overall, one complete (CR) and 13 partial responses (PR) (overall response rate = 23; 95% C.I:12.4-33.5%] were documented. The combination of pemetrexed and docetaxel seems to be an effective regimen in NSCLC with acceptable and manageable toxicity, which merits further investigation.

Second-line paclitaxel/carboplatin versus vinorelbine/carboplatin in patients who have advanced non-small-cell lung cancer pretreated with non-platinum-based chemotherapy: a multicenter randomized phase II study.

PURPOSE: This study evaluates the activity and toxicity of the paclitaxel/carboplatin (PC) doublet versus vinorelbine/carboplatin (VC) doublet as second-line treatment in patients who have advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND TREATMENT: Patients pretreated with front-line docetaxel and gemcitabine were randomized to receive either PC (n = 75), which consisted of paclitaxel at a dose of 140 mg/m(2) and carboplatin area under the curve (AUC3), or VC (n = 78), which consisted of vinorelbine at a dose of 45 mg/m(2) orally and carboplatin AUC3; both drugs were administered on days 1 and 15. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 18.6% (95% confidence interval, 9.85%-27.49%; one complete and 13 partial responses) in the PC arm and 7.7% (95% confidence interval, 1.78%-13.61%; one complete and five partial responses) in the VC arm (P = .056). Median time to tumor progression was 3.5 months (range, 0.3 - 23.73 months) and 3.07 months (range, 0.37-18.5) in the PC and VC arm, respectively (P = .287). Median overall survival was 7.83 months (range, 0.3-45.03 months) and 7.60 months (range, 0.5-30.27 months) for PC and VC arms, respectively (P value = .633). Chemotherapy was well-tolerated and grade III/IV toxicities were relatively infrequent. No toxic deaths were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Platinum-based doublets with either paclitaxel or vinorelbine in patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC pretreated with front-line docetaxel/gemcitabine show comparable efficacy when used in the second-line setting.

PIK3CA hotspot mutation scanning by a novel and highly sensitive high-resolution small amplicon melting analysis method.

Somatic mutations in the PIK3CA gene have been discovered in many human cancers, and their presence correlates to therapy response. Three "hotspot" mutations within the PIK3CA gene are localized in exons 9 and 20. High-resolution melting analysis (HRMA) is a highly sensitive, robust, rapid, and cost-effective mutation analysis technique. We developed a novel methodology for the detection of hotspot mutations in exons 9 and 20 of the PIK3CA gene that is based on a combination of PCR and HRMA. The PIK3CA HRMA assay was evaluated by performing repeatability, sensitivity, and comparison with DNA sequencing studies and was further validated in 129 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded breast tissue samples: 99 tumors, 20 noncancerous, and 10 fibroadenomas. The developed methodology was further applied in a selected group of 75 breast cancer patients who underwent Trastuzumab treatment. In sensitivity studies, the assay presented a capability to detect as low as 1% of mutated dsDNA in the presence of wtDNA for both exons. In the 99 tumor samples (validation group), 12/99 (12.1%) exon 9 mutations and 20/99 (20.2%) exon 20 mutations were found. No mutations were found in noncancerous tissues. In fibroadenomas, we report one PIK3CA mutation for the first time. In the selected group, 30/75 (40%) samples were detected as mutants. The PIK3CA HRMA assay is highly sensitive, reliable, cost-effective, and easy-to-perform, and therefore can be used as a screening test in a high-throughput pharmacodiagnostic setting.

A retrospective analysis of non-platinum-based first- and second-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Platinum-based chemotherapy represents the standard of care for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) while non-platinum-based regimens are frequently administered in patients with relapse. A retrospective analysis of the sequence administration of these regimens in the first- and second-line setting was performed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The records of patients enrolled in the Hellenic Oncology Research Groups's randomized advanced NSCLC trials from February 1997 to September 2006 were retrospectively reviewed. The efficacy of non-platinum-based chemotherapy administered as first- or second-line treatment (n=94, cohort A) was compared to that of non-platinum-based first-line followed by platinum-based second-line chemotherapy (n=267, cohort B), and the reverse sequence (n=123, cohort C). RESULTS: The objective response rate (ORR) to first-line chemotherapy was higher in cohort C compared to cohort A (45.5% vs. 25.5%, respectively, p=0.002) and cohort B (45.5% vs. 21.3%, p=0.0001). The ORR to second-line therapy was 17%, 13.1% (p=0.349) and 7.3% (p=0.027) in cohorts A, B and C, respectively. Time to progression and the overall survival were comparable among the three cohorts in both first- and second line therapy. CONCLUSION: Platinum-based first-line chemotherapy improved response rate compared to non-platinum-based regimens; however, the overall survival was comparable, irrespective of the sequence administration of these regimens is the first- and second-line setting.

Phase III study comparing sequential versus alternate administration of cisplatin-etoposide and topotecan as first-line treatment in small cell lung cancer.

AIM: To compare the efficacy and tolerance of sequential versus alternate front-line administration of cisplatin-etoposide (PE) and topotecan (T) in patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive either 4 cycles PE (cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) i.v. day 1 and etoposide100 mg/m(2)/d i.v. days 1-3 every 21 days) followed by 4 cycles T (1.5 mg/m(2)/d i.v. days 1-5 every 21 days) (arm A, 183 patients) or the same regimens using an alternate sequence (arm B, 181 patients). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in terms of compliance with treatment, overall response rates (51.4% vs. 55.2%; p=0.458), median response duration (4.3 vs. 5.2 months; p=0.780), median time to tumour progression (5.7 vs. 6.4 months; p=0.494), median overall survival (10.9 vs. 9.8 months; p=0.186) and 1-year survival (43.8% vs. 36.5%) between the two arms. The incidence of severe grade 3-4 haematological and grade 2-4 non-haematological (asthenia, mucositis, diarrhoea and neurotoxicity) toxicity was comparable between the two arms. CONCLUSION: The comparison of sequential versus alternate administration of cisplatin-etoposide and topotecan as front-line treatment of patients with extensive stage SCLC revealed no clinically meaningful differences in terms of efficacy and tolerance.

Caveolin-1 regulates EGFR signaling in MCF-7 breast cancer cells and enhances gefitinib-induced tumor cell inhibition.

Caveolin-1, an essential protein constituent of caveolae, is involved in cell signaling through its association with various signaling molecules. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) interacts directly with caveolin-1 and this interaction functionally regulates EGFR tyrosine kinase activity. In this report we investigated the role of caveolin-1 overexpression on EGFR signaling in MCF-7 breast cancer cell line. We demonstrate here that although total EGFR expression levels are similar, EGFR phosphorylation is diminished in MCF-7/CAV1 cells compared to parental MCF-7 cells. In addition, MCF-7/CAV1 cells exhibit higher total and activated Akt levels. Moreover, MCF-7/CAV1 cells stimulated with EGF display higher EGFR and Akt phosphorylation associated with enhanced proliferative and motility rates, compared to MCF-7 cells. Pretreatment with gefitinib inhibits EGF-induced stimulation of both EGFR and downstream Akt and MAPK more efficiently in MCF-7/CAV1 than in MCF-7 cells. In accordance, EGF-induced proliferation and migration is more effectively suppressed with gefinitib in MCF-7/CAV1 compared to parental cells. In conclusion these results suggest that caveolin-1 overexpression in MCF-7 breast cancer cell line modulates EGFR activation levels and EGF-induced EGFR signalling. This is associated with enhanced antitumor effects of gefitinib suggesting a role for EGFR inhibition in caveolin-1 overexpressing breast cancers.

Pooled analysis of elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with front line docetaxel/gemcitabine regimen: the Hellenic Oncology Research Group experience.

INTRODUCTION: Thirty to 40% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are older than 70 years and rarely are enrolled in clinical trials. Moreover, in clinical practice, > 75% of patients older than 65 years with metastatic NSCLC never receive any kind of chemotherapy. PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate the impact of age on efficacy and toxicity of chemotherapy regimens in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with the docetaxel-gemcitabine combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Pooled data from six clinical trials of the Hellenic Oncology Research Group were analyzed. According to their age, patients were divided into two groups: those with age < 70 years and those with > or = 70 years. RESULTS: A total of 858 patients were included in this analysis. Six hundred sixty-six (77.6%) patients were younger than 70 years, whereas 192 (22.4%) patients where > or = 70-year-old. Overall response rate was 30.3% and 30.2% for patients < 70 years and > or = 70 years, respectively (p = 0.974). The median time to tumor progression was 4.1 and 4.5 months for patients < 70 years and > or = 70 years, respectively (p = 0.948). Median overall survival was 9.9 and 9.2 months for patients < 70 and > or = 70, respectively (p = 0.117). The multivariate analysis revealed performance status (PS) (p = 0.0001) and stage (p = 0.0001) as independent factors with significant impact on the hazard of death. Chemotherapy was well tolerated, but the incidence of grade III/IV mucositis was significantly higher in elderly patients (0.2% versus 1.5% for patients < 70 versus > or = 70 years, respectively; p = 0.011). CONCLUSION: The docetaxel/gemcitabine regimen has a comparable efficacy and tolerance in young (< 70 years) and elderly (> or = 70 years) patients.

A dose escalating study of oxaliplatin and high dose weekly leucovorin and 5-Fluorouracil in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: To determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the maximum tolerated doses (MTD) of L-OHP plus 5-FU and LV in patients with advanced solid malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received escalated doses of L-OHP (starting dose 50 mg/m2) as a 2-hour IV infusion on Days 1 and 15, and LV (500 mg/m2 as a 2-hour IV infusion) followed by escalated doses of 5FU (starting dose 1,800 mg/m2) as a 22-hour continuous IV infusion on Days 1, 8, 15, 21 every 6 weeks. DLTs were evaluated in the first cycle. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients [median age: 66 years; PS (ECOG) 0-1 in 90 percent] were treated on 12 dose-levels. Five (10 percent) patients had received 2 prior chemotherapy regimens, 24 (46 percent) one, and 23 (44 percent) were chemo-naïve. The DLT was reached at the dose of LOHP 100 mg/m2 and 5FU 2,200 mg/m2. Dose-limiting events were G3 diarrhea, G3 asthenia, G4 neutropenia, and G4 thrombocytopenia. Grade 3 diarrhea was observed in 6 (12 percent) patients and Grade 3 fatigue in 6 (12 percent). One (2 percent) patient developed Grade 4 neutropenia and another (2 percent) Grade 4 thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSION: The MTD were L-OHP 95 mg/m2 on d1 and d15 and 5FU 2,200 mg/m2/week for 4 consecutive weeks every 6 weeks.